{"id":245,"date":"2024-02-18T09:12:04","date_gmt":"2024-02-18T02:12:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/supreme-court-decisions-about-lease-in-thailand\/"},"modified":"2026-10-05T06:36:19","modified_gmt":"2026-10-04T23:36:19","slug":"supreme-court-decisions-about-lease-in-thailand","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions-about-lease-in-thailand\/","title":{"rendered":"R\u00e9sum\u00e9 des d\u00e9cisions de la Cour supr\u00eame concernant les baux en Tha\u00eflande"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Understanding how Thailand\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/supreme-court-dika\/\">Cour supr\u00eame<\/a> (often referred to as the Dika Court) interprets <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/lease-agreement-in-thailand\/\">contrats de bail<\/a> is crucial for anyone involved with property leasing in Thailand, whether as a lessor or lessee. These rulings clarify how courts address various situations, from the consequences of a tenant&#8217;s death and the inheritability of leases to the enforceability of promises to renew a lease. Importantly, these Supreme Court decisions about lease in Thailand reveal that while leases might seem like straightforward contracts, they involve legal nuances under the Thai <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/thai-civil-and-commercial-code\/\">Code civil et commercial<\/a> (CCC) that can lead to significant misunderstandings if not properly understood. This summary explains key principles derived from important Supreme Court decisions about lease in Thailand that shape Thailand\u2019s leasing landscape.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-rank-math-toc-block\" id=\"rank-math-toc\"><h2>Table des mati\u00e8res<\/h2><nav><ul><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#leases-are-primarily-personal-rights\">Les baux en tant que droits essentiellement personnels\u00a0: Interpr\u00e9tations cl\u00e9s<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#lease-inheritance-in-thailand-rules-and-exceptions\">Succession de bail en Tha\u00eflande\u00a0: r\u00e8gles et exceptions<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#when-leases-involve-more-contracts-for-consideration\">Quand les baux impliquent plus\u00a0: les contrats \u00e0 titre on\u00e9reux<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#promises-to-lease-or-renew-issues-of-enforceability\">Promesses de location ou de renouvellement : questions d&#039;applicabilit\u00e9<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#accepting-lease-promises-timing-validity-and-registration\">Acceptation des promesses de location\u00a0: d\u00e9lais, validit\u00e9 et enregistrement<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#the-30-year-limit-no-automatic-renewals\">The 30-year limit and lawful renewal<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#final-considerations-on-thai-lease-agreements\">Consid\u00e9rations finales sur les contrats de location tha\u00eflandais<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#official-sources-and-further-information\">Sources officielles et informations compl\u00e9mentaires\u00a0:<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#renewal-reciprocal-case-notes\">Case notes: renewal and special reciprocal agreements<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/supreme-court-decision-about-leases-in-thailand.jpg\" alt=\"D\u00e9cisions de la Cour supr\u00eame concernant les baux en Tha\u00eflande\" class=\"wp-image-11675 tlo-responsive-img\"\/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"leases-are-primarily-personal-rights\"><strong>Les baux en tant que droits essentiellement personnels\u00a0: Interpr\u00e9tations cl\u00e9s<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Un principe fondamental du droit tha\u00eflandais, renforc\u00e9 par de nombreuses d\u00e9cisions de justice, est qu&#039;un bail est g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement un&nbsp;<em>droit personnel<\/em>&nbsp;tied specifically to the lessee. Consequently, the lease typically ends when the lessee dies, unless the contract explicitly provides for transfer or succession in a legally valid manner (the result depends on the nature of the right and the agreement; section 569 concerns a transfer of ownership).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Plusieurs&nbsp;<strong>D\u00e9cisions de la Cour Dika<\/strong>&nbsp;fondatrices illustrent cela\u00a0:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>D\u00e9cision de la Cour supr\u00eame n\u00b0 540\/2517\u00a0:<\/strong>&nbsp;Il a \u00e9t\u00e9 soulign\u00e9 que m\u00eame si le conjoint d&#039;un locataire d\u00e9c\u00e9d\u00e9 continuait de payer le loyer accept\u00e9 par le bailleur, le bail initial (personnel au d\u00e9funt) \u00e9tait r\u00e9sili\u00e9. En l&#039;absence d&#039;un nouvel accord \u00e9crit, l&#039;expulsion \u00e9tait autoris\u00e9e. Cette affaire met en \u00e9vidence le caract\u00e8re personnel du bail, tel qu&#039;il est pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 dans&nbsp;<strong>Jurisprudence tha\u00eflandaise en mati\u00e8re de baux<\/strong>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>D\u00e9cision n\u00b0 119\/2509\u00a0:<\/strong>&nbsp;Il a \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tabli que le paiement continu du loyer apr\u00e8s le d\u00e9c\u00e8s du locataire ne constitue pas automatiquement un nouveau bail ; le contrat initial prend fin au d\u00e9c\u00e8s.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>D\u00e9cision n\u00b0 901\/2508\u00a0:<\/strong>&nbsp;The lessee was a limited partnership whose managing partner, liable without limit, died. No liquidation was in issue, so the partnership could not be treated as still existing for that purpose; it had ceased to be a juristic person, the lease ended with its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/dissolution-liquidation\/\">dissolution<\/a>, and those occupying under it had no right to remain.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>D\u00e9cision n\u00b0 5859\/2530\u00a0:<\/strong>&nbsp;Il a \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 qu&#039;en cas de colocation, le d\u00e9c\u00e8s de l&#039;un d&#039;entre eux ne met fin au bail que pour la part de cette personne\u00a0; les colocataires survivants peuvent continuer.<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Comprendre ces interpr\u00e9tations est crucial pour anticiper les r\u00e9sultats en se basant sur des&nbsp;<strong>pr\u00e9c\u00e9dents juridiques en mati\u00e8re de baux tha\u00eflandais<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"lease-inheritance-in-thailand-rules-and-exceptions\"><strong>Succession de bail en Tha\u00eflande\u00a0: r\u00e8gles et exceptions<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">D\u00e9rivant du principe des droits personnels, les baux ne sont g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement&nbsp;<em>pas<\/em>&nbsp;h\u00e9r\u00e9ditaires. Cependant,&nbsp;<strong>Interpr\u00e9tations de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/strong>&nbsp;ont pr\u00e9vu d&#039;importantes exceptions en fonction des sp\u00e9cificit\u00e9s contractuelles\u00a0:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>D\u00e9cision de la formation pl\u00e9ni\u00e8re n\u00b0 11058\/2559<\/strong> is the authority, and it gives two independent reasons. The lease was for thirty years, in writing and registered, and the contract expressly allowed the lessee to sublet. That is an agreement contracting out of&nbsp;<strong>CCC Section 544 paragraph one<\/strong>, so the lease right was not a purely personal right but a property right capable of transfer and sublease. The Court then added the reason most summaries miss: the defendants were the&nbsp;<em>heirs<\/em>&nbsp;of the lessee and therefore <strong>not &#8220;third parties&#8221; within Section 544 at all<\/strong>, which restricts transfer to outsiders. The lease right did not end, the registered term had not run out, and the owners could not evict. Decided in Grand Bench session 9\/2559 on CCC Sections 538 and 544 paragraph one. So a lease&nbsp;<em>peut<\/em>&nbsp;\u00eatre h\u00e9rit\u00e9s pour la dur\u00e9e restante. Ces&nbsp;<strong>D\u00e9cisions de la Cour supr\u00eame concernant les baux en Tha\u00eflande<\/strong>&nbsp;montrent comment les clauses contractuelles peuvent pr\u00e9valoir sur la r\u00e8gle g\u00e9n\u00e9rale.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The landlord\u2019s death and a sale require separate analysis. Existing obligations passing to an estate should be examined under the inheritance provisions; section 569 addresses transfer of ownership.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>D\u00e9cision n\u00b0 6472\/2548<\/strong>&nbsp;decided this rather than touching on it. A 20-year shopping-centre lease charged 1,235 baht a month plus a lease-right fee of 2,790,550 baht. The Court held that a rent that low over that term showed the fee was in substance rent paid in advance, and that the contract forfeited it only for the tenant&#8217;s own default, not on death. The lessee having died, the lessor had to refund the unused part of the fee to the heir. The Court reached that under the lease provisions, not as unjust enrichment.<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong>Derni\u00e8re r\u00e9vision : 17 septembre 2026.<\/strong> This was a targeted review of the case citations on this page rather than of the page as a whole. Eleven decisions cited in prose above were read in Thai against the published judgments: 119\/2509, 316\/2530, 563\/2540, 876\/2537, 901\/2508, 1051\/2514, 3263\/2535, 5859\/2530, 6472\/2548, 11058\/2559 and 748\/2533. Eight stand as published. Three were corrected: the lessee in 901\/2508 was a limited partnership rather than a company, 6472\/2548 decided the refund of prepaid rent instead of merely raising it, and 748\/2533 supports compelling the further lease rather than an order to register. For 748\/2533 both of our sources carry the court&#8217;s summary attached to the text of a different judgment, so only its summary is relied on here. This review did not re-check the statutory sections, the fees, or the practice guidance elsewhere on this page. <strong>Added 20 September 2026:<\/strong> two further decisions, <strong>172\/2488<\/strong> ET <strong>801-802\/2492<\/strong>, were read in Thai against the published judgments. They had been outside every earlier citation check because the screen that finds case numbers on our pages matched only Buddhist-era years from 2500 onwards, and these are from 2488 and 2492; that screen was widened the same day. Both are correctly cited here for the rule that a lease carrying a reciprocal undertaking by the lessee passes to the heirs of the lessee, and the facts, the reasoning and the outcome of each are now on the page. Neither was sound as to what the lessee in each case had undertaken to do, which differed between them. Re-checked on 5 October 2026: four further decisions read in Thai against the published judgments, 540\/2517, 1062\/2539, 7386\/2548 and 6763\/2541; the first three stand as written, and the line on 6763\/2541 was corrected, because the Court held the renewal agreement bound only the original parties whether or not it had been accepted. The case notes further down and the statutory sections were not re-checked in this pass.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"when-leases-involve-more-contracts-for-consideration\"><strong>Quand les baux impliquent plus\u00a0: les contrats \u00e0 titre on\u00e9reux<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Quelques<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/lease-agreement-in-thailand\/\"> contrats de location en Tha\u00eflande<\/a> vont au-del\u00e0 du simple loyer. Si un locataire effectue un investissement important et convenu (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/superficies-in-thailand\/\">comme la construction de b\u00e2timents qui profitent au bailleur \u00e0 long terme<\/a>), les tribunaux tha\u00eflandais peuvent le qualifier de \u201c\u00a0contrat \u00e0 titre on\u00e9reux\u00a0\u201d (\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0d\u0e32\u0e15\u0e48\u0e32\u0e07\u0e15\u0e2d\u0e1a\u0e41\u0e17\u0e19\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e40\u0e28\u0e29\u0e22\u0e34\u0e48\u0e07\u0e01\u0e27\u0e48\u0e32\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e40\u0e0a\u0e48\u0e32\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e14\u0e32), accordant des droits au-del\u00e0 d\u2019un bail standard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>D\u00e9cisions n\u00b0 172\/2488<\/strong>&nbsp;ET&nbsp;<strong>801-802\/2492:<\/strong>&nbsp;In both the lessee had undertaken to do something beyond paying rent, and in both the heirs won. In <strong>172\/2488<\/strong> the lessee had agreed to pay for improving a building belonging to the lessor, in exchange for a further 15 years at the same rent. The Court held that bargain a reciprocal contract concerning property, so it passed to his heirs, and the administrator of his estate could compel the lessor to grant the remaining 15 years. In <strong>801-802\/2492<\/strong> the lease was of land for an orchard, 12 years, registered at the Land Office, and the lessee had to find and plant the fruit trees himself; when he died the lessor sued his widow and his child to evict them, and the first court agreed that the lease had been personal to him. The Supreme Court did not: this was no ordinary lease of land to gather fruit, as the planting obligation in clauses 1 and 2 showed, the rent was low, and nothing could be harvested for five years. The appeal by the lessor was dismissed, the family kept the land to the end of the term, and the 4,150 THB raised by selling the orange crop during the case went to them as fruits of the land they leased. That judgment cites 172\/2488 by number, so the two are one line of authority, and note that it is a combined judgment numbered 801-802\/2492. &nbsp;<strong>What makes the difference is the undertaking the lessee gives in exchange, not the size of the sum spent.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cette distinction se retrouve \u00e9galement dans les contrats de location-vente (articles 572 \u00e0 574 du CCC).&nbsp;<strong>D\u00e9cisions n\u00b0 2578-2579\/2515<\/strong>&nbsp;hold that a hire-purchase contract is not an ordinary lease: it carries a promise to sell (<span lang=\"th\">&#3588;&#3635;&#3617;&#3633;&#3656;&#3609;&#3623;&#3656;&#3634;&#3592;&#3632;&#3586;&#3634;&#3618;<\/span>) conditional on the instalments being paid, and the right to become owner on completing them is&nbsp;<em>pas<\/em>&nbsp;a personal right. The contract can therefore be succeeded to, and when the hire-purchaser died the heirs took over the rights. The lesson for drafting is that what makes the arrangement inheritable is the promise to sell, not the label on the document.<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"promises-to-lease-or-renew-issues-of-enforceability\"><strong>Promesses de location ou de renouvellement : questions d&#039;applicabilit\u00e9<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Les clauses promettant des baux futurs ou des renouvellements n\u00e9cessitent un examen attentif, car&nbsp;<strong>analyses judiciaires<\/strong>&nbsp;montrent qu&#039;elles ne sont pas toujours contraignantes\u00a0:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>Decision No. 3263\/2535<\/strong>&nbsp;is the one to know. The lease said that if the lessee had not breached, the lessor&nbsp;<em>&#8220;will consider extending the term for a further period&#8221;<\/em>. The Court held that this expresses an intention that the lessor will exercise its&nbsp;<strong>discretion<\/strong>&nbsp;at the end of the term, and that even where the lessee has not breached, whether to renew remains the lessor&#8217;s discretion. The clause was therefore&nbsp;<strong>not a promise to lease<\/strong>&nbsp;(<span lang=\"th\">&#3588;&#3635;&#3617;&#3633;&#3656;&#3609;&#3592;&#3632;&#3651;&#3627;&#3657;&#3648;&#3594;&#3656;&#3634;<\/span>) at all, and the tenant was evicted despite having asked to renew.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The practical rule that follows: a renewal clause that leaves the rent, the term or the decision itself to be settled later is an agreement to negotiate, not an enforceable promise. If a renewal is meant to bind, the rent and the term have to be fixed in the clause, and the lessor must not be left a discretion to decline.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Une promesse v\u00e9ritablement ex\u00e9cutoire requiert g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement des conditions pr\u00e9cises et une acceptation en bonne et due forme.<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"accepting-lease-promises-timing-validity-and-registration\"><strong>Acceptation des promesses de location\u00a0: d\u00e9lais, validit\u00e9 et enregistrement<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La validit\u00e9 de l&#039;acceptation d&#039;une promesse de renouvellement d\u00e9pend de plusieurs facteurs, comme l&#039;ont pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 les&nbsp;<strong>d\u00e9cisions judiciaires tha\u00eflandaises<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n\n<li><strong>Timing:<\/strong>&nbsp;L&#039;acceptation doit g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement intervenir dans un d\u00e9lai stipul\u00e9 (<strong>D\u00e9cision n\u00b0 316\/2530<\/strong>) ou, si aucune pr\u00e9cision n&#039;est apport\u00e9e, avant l&#039;expiration du bail initial (<strong>D\u00e9cision n\u00b0 1051\/2514<\/strong>).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Inscription:<\/strong>&nbsp;Pour une applicabilit\u00e9 \u00e0 long terme (plus de 3 ans), l&#039;enregistrement est essentiel (article 538 du CCC).&nbsp;<strong>D\u00e9cision n\u00b0 563\/2540<\/strong>&nbsp;Il a d\u00e9montr\u00e9 qu&#039;un bail \u00e0 long terme non enregistr\u00e9 (et potentiellement sa promesse de renouvellement) n&#039;est ex\u00e9cutoire que pendant 3 ans.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Maintien dans les lieux :<\/strong>&nbsp;Le simple fait de rester et de payer le loyer apr\u00e8s l&#039;expiration ne r\u00e9active pas une promesse caduque ; il cr\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement un bail \u00e0 dur\u00e9e ind\u00e9termin\u00e9e (article 570 du CCC,&nbsp;<strong>D\u00e9cision n\u00b0 876\/2537<\/strong>).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Landlord\u2019s death before acceptance:<\/strong> Examine sections 169(2) and 360, including whether the tenant knew of the death before accepting. Compare <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions-about-lease-in-thailand\/#dika-1213-2517\">1213\/2517<\/a> ET <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions-about-lease-in-thailand\/#dika-4872-2539\">4872\/2539<\/a>; death alone does not explain both outcomes.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Preuves \u00e9crites\u00a0:<\/strong>&nbsp;Les promesses verbales ne sont g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement pas ex\u00e9cutoires ; une preuve \u00e9crite sign\u00e9e par la partie responsable (bailleur) est requise (article 538 du CCC,&nbsp;<strong>D\u00e9cisions n\u00b0 1062\/2539 et 7386\/2548<\/strong>).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Vente immobili\u00e8re :<\/strong>&nbsp;A new owner is&nbsp;<em>pas<\/em>&nbsp;bound by the previous owner&#8217;s agreement to renew, unless the new owner agreed to take it on (<strong>D\u00e9cision n\u00b0 6763\/2541<\/strong>). That held even though the original contract was more than an ordinary lease (the buildings were to pass to the lessor): the renewal agreement was a separate personal right binding only the parties who made it.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>L&#039;acceptation en temps opportun d&#039;une&nbsp;<em>valide<\/em>&nbsp;promesse cr\u00e9e une nouvelle obligation (<strong>D\u00e9cision n\u00b0 1925\/2517<\/strong>). Where the promise fixes the further term and the rent, the lessor is a debtor of that obligation and cannot refuse once the lessee has given notice in time (<strong>D\u00e9cision n\u00b0 748\/2533<\/strong>, a promise of ten further years at 800 baht a month with no additional lump sum).<\/li>\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"the-30-year-limit-no-automatic-renewals\">The 30-year limit and lawful renewal<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-540\/\">section 540<\/a> permits renewal for a further term up to 30 years. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/4655-2566-lease-term-limit\/\">4655\/2566<\/a>, same-day promises for two more 30-year terms, with advance payment covering the entire arrangement, were treated as an evasion of the statutory limit. The decision concerns the substance of the transaction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Comparer <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions-about-lease-in-thailand\/#dika-1925-2517\">1925\/2517<\/a> ET <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions-about-lease-in-thailand\/#dika-4872-2539\">4872\/2539<\/a>, where acceptance supported a further short-term lease. A blanket statement that every advance renewal promise is invalid would overlook those authorities. The construction cases also support enforcement of agreed occupation rights, but do not establish an exemption allowing a prepaid 60-year or 90-year residential lease.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the combined analysis, read <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">reciprocal agreements, construction investment and lease renewal<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"final-considerations-on-thai-lease-agreements\"><strong>Consid\u00e9rations finales sur les contrats de location tha\u00eflandais<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Draft the occupation period, construction obligations and renewal process clearly. Under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-171\/\">article 171<\/a>, true intention matters when interpreting declarations; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-538\/\">article 538<\/a> ET <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-540\/\">section 540<\/a> address different questions of form and duration. Register a lawful long-term lease where required, preserve evidence of performance and deliver any acceptance notice through the agreed method within the agreed deadline.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"official-sources-and-further-information\"><strong>Sources officielles et informations compl\u00e9mentaires\u00a0:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>La Cour supr\u00eame de Tha\u00eflande (\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e0e\u0e35\u0e01\u0e32)\u00a0:<\/strong>&nbsp;L&#039;acc\u00e8s aux d\u00e9cisions de cas sp\u00e9cifiques (\u0e04\u0e33\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e01\u0e29\u0e32\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e0e\u0e35\u0e01\u0e32) n\u00e9cessite g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement l&#039;utilisation de la base de donn\u00e9es en langue tha\u00eflandaise.\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Portail principal de la Cour de justice\u00a0:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.coj.go.th\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/www.coj.go.th\/<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>ThaiDeka judgment reproductions (independent database):&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/deka.in.th\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/deka.in.th\/<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Portail des annonces judiciaires (avis \u00e9lectronique)\u00a0:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/enotice.coj.go.th\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/enotice.coj.go.th\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Code civil et commercial (CCC) :<\/strong>&nbsp;Les dispositions relatives au bail (\u201c Location de biens \u201d) se trouvent principalement dans les articles 537 \u00e0 571. Les versions officielles peuvent \u00eatre obtenues aupr\u00e8s des sources gouvernementales.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Trouver des traductions anglaises compl\u00e8tes et \u00e0 jour de&nbsp;<strong>d\u00e9cisions de la Cour Dika<\/strong>&nbsp;peut s&#039;av\u00e9rer difficile. Les professionnels du droit locaux restent la meilleure source d&#039;interpr\u00e9tations actuelles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<section id=\"renewal-reciprocal-case-notes\"><h2>Case notes: renewal and special reciprocal agreements<\/h2>\n<p>These summaries distinguish each court ruling from its practical implications. Source links lead to ThaiDeka reproductions of judgments or published digests. Case years use the Buddhist Era. Read the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">full reciprocal-agreements analysis<\/a> et le <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/contracts-leases\/\">curated contracts-and-leases collection<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The collection already includes <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/4655-2566-lease-term-limit\/\">4655\/2566: prepaid lease extensions<\/a>. The additional decisions follow.<\/p>\n<article id=\"dika-1627-2505\"><h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/1627-2505-construction-contribution-fourteen-year-lease\/\">1627\/2505<\/a>: Construction contributions and a 14-year occupation bargain<\/h3><p>The tenant contributed towards construction. The bargain contemplated successive three-year documents but a total occupation period of 14 years and registration. The published digest records enforcement of the complete reciprocal arrangement despite the absence of later renewal documents. This supports completion of the agreed original term.<\/p><p><strong>Scope:<\/strong> Application du d\u00e9lai total convenu ; pas de prolongation au-del\u00e0 de 30 ans.<\/p><p><strong>Related Code provisions:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-369\/\">article 369<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-538\/\">article 538<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-540\/\">section 540<\/a>. These links include related provisions for comparison and do not mean every provision was applied in the judgment.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/deka.in.th\/deka\/2505-1627\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Thai judgment digest<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">Reciprocal agreements and renewal<\/a><\/p><\/article>\n<article id=\"dika-1925-2517\"><h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/1925-2517-written-acceptance-lease-renewal\/\">1925\/2517<\/a>: Written acceptance creates a new three-year lease<\/h3><p>Le bail initial de trois ans promettait trois ann\u00e9es suppl\u00e9mentaires si le locataire donnait un pr\u00e9avis \u00e9crit dans le mois suivant l'expiration. Le locataire s'est conform\u00e9 \u00e0 cette exigence. La Cour a jug\u00e9 que l'acceptation a cr\u00e9\u00e9 un nouveau bail aux conditions stipul\u00e9es sans exiger un autre document contractuel. L'affaire concernait des termes courts, et non une structure d\u00e9passant la limite de 30 ans.<\/p><p><strong>Scope:<\/strong> Support direct pour le renouvellement par acceptation ; le cas concernait des contrats \u00e0 court terme.<\/p><p><strong>Related Code provisions:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-537\/\">section 537<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-538\/\">article 538<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-168\/\">article 168<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-169\/\">article 169<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-361\/\">article 361<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-540\/\">section 540<\/a>. These links include related provisions for comparison and do not mean every provision was applied in the judgment.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/deka.in.th\/deka\/2517-1925\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Thai judgment<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">Reciprocal agreements and renewal<\/a><\/p><\/article>\n<article id=\"dika-4872-2539\"><h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/4872-2539-lease-renewal-heir-acceptance\/\">4872\/2539<\/a>: Renewal against an heir: knowledge of death and acceptance<\/h3><p>Apr\u00e8s un bail de 15 ans, le preneur a invoqu\u00e9 une promesse pour une nouvelle p\u00e9riode de trois ans en se fondant sur un loyer de r\u00e9f\u00e9rence convenu et des frais de renouvellement. La connaissance du d\u00e9c\u00e8s du bailleur avant l'acceptation n'a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tablie. En appliquant l'article 169, alin\u00e9a 2, combin\u00e9 avec l'article 360, la Cour a confirm\u00e9 l'obligation \u00e0 l'encontre de l'h\u00e9ritier et a rejet\u00e9 l'exception d'ordre public sur ces faits.<\/p><p><strong>Scope:<\/strong> La Cour a rejet\u00e9 l'exception d'ordre public sur ces faits, et non une structure pr\u00e9pay\u00e9e de 90 ans.<\/p><p><strong>Related Code provisions:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-169\/\">article 169<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-360\/\">article 360<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-540\/\">section 540<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-569\/\">article 569<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-1600\/\">article 1600<\/a>. These links include related provisions for comparison and do not mean every provision was applied in the judgment.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/deka.in.th\/deka\/2539-4872\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Thai judgment<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">Reciprocal agreements and renewal<\/a><\/p><\/article>\n<article id=\"dika-8534-2542\"><h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/8534-2542-construction-twenty-year-lease\/\">8534\/2542<\/a>: Construction bargain protects the agreed 20-year term<\/h3><p>La construction et le transfert d'un b\u00e2timent au propri\u00e9taire constituaient la contreprestation convenue pour 20 ans d'occupation. Le litige est survenu apr\u00e8s l'\u00e9coulement d'une partie de la p\u00e9riode. Un traitement r\u00e9ciproque sp\u00e9cial a justifi\u00e9 la p\u00e9riode convenue restante malgr\u00e9 l'absence d'\u00e9crit et d'enregistrement. Les ann\u00e9es restantes faisaient partie de l'\u00e9change initial, et non d'une p\u00e9riode suppl\u00e9mentaire au-del\u00e0 de 30 ans.<\/p><p><strong>Scope:<\/strong> La p\u00e9riode restante faisait partie de l'\u00e9change initial.<\/p><p><strong>Related Code provisions:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-538\/\">article 538<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-369\/\">article 369<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-540\/\">section 540<\/a>. These links include related provisions for comparison and do not mean every provision was applied in the judgment.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/deka.in.th\/deka\/2542-8534\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Thai judgment<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">Reciprocal agreements and renewal<\/a><\/p><\/article>\n<article id=\"dika-3279-2524\"><h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/3279-2524-construction-lease-binds-estate\/\">3279\/2524<\/a>: A 30-year construction agreement binds the landlord\u2019s estate<\/h3><p>The tenants agreed to build on the land, paid the agreed compensation, and were entitled to occupy for 30 years. The buildings would pass to the owner at expiry. The Supreme Court treated the exchange as more than an ordinary lease and upheld dismissal of the estate\u2019s eviction action before the agreed period ended.<\/p><p><strong>Scope:<\/strong> La Cour a confirm\u00e9 la protection pour la p\u00e9riode convenue de 30 ans.<\/p><p><strong>Related Code provisions:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-369\/\">article 369<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-537\/\">section 537<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-1599\/\">article 1599<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-538\/\">article 538<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-1600\/\">article 1600<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-540\/\">section 540<\/a>. These links include related provisions for comparison and do not mean every provision was applied in the judgment.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/deka.in.th\/deka\/2524-3279-101376\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Thai judgment<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">Reciprocal agreements and renewal<\/a><\/p><\/article>\n<article id=\"dika-2526-2531\"><h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/2526-2531-construction-lease-heirs-limitation\/\">2526\/2531<\/a>: Estate bound by construction lease; registration claim time-barred<\/h3><p>The tenant contributed 110,000 baht towards construction in exchange for a 20-year term and permission to sublet. The Court held that the special reciprocal obligations passed to heirs and rejected eviction. However, the separate counterclaim seeking registration was brought more than one year after knowledge of the landlord\u2019s death and failed under section 1754(3).<\/p><p><strong>Scope:<\/strong> La demande reconventionnelle distincte en enregistrement a \u00e9chou\u00e9 en raison du d\u00e9lai de prescription successorale.<\/p><p><strong>Related Code provisions:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-369\/\">article 369<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-537\/\">section 537<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-538\/\">article 538<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-1599\/\">article 1599<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-1600\/\">article 1600<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-1754\/\">section 1754<\/a>. These links include related provisions for comparison and do not mean every provision was applied in the judgment.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/deka.in.th\/deka\/2531-2526\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Thai judgment<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">Reciprocal agreements and renewal<\/a><\/p><\/article>\n<article id=\"dika-379-2511\"><h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/379-2511-special-lease-status-after-expiry\/\">379\/2511<\/a>: Special reciprocal status does not carry forward automatically<\/h3><p>A construction contribution supported the original six-year arrangement. After expiry, the later tenancy was classified as an ordinary lease despite a further lump-sum payment. The decision supports examining the exchange for the later term separately. A prior construction investment does not automatically confer special reciprocal status on every subsequent tenancy.<\/p><p><strong>Scope:<\/strong> Le statut de r\u00e9ciprocit\u00e9 sp\u00e9ciale ne se prolonge pas automatiquement pour une p\u00e9riode ult\u00e9rieure.<\/p><p><strong>Related Code provisions:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-538\/\">article 538<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-369\/\">article 369<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-540\/\">section 540<\/a>. These links include related provisions for comparison and do not mean every provision was applied in the judgment.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/deka.in.th\/deka\/2511-379\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Thai judgment<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">Reciprocal agreements and renewal<\/a><\/p><\/article>\n<article id=\"dika-412-2511\"><h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/412-2511-special-reciprocal-lease-unpaid-rent\/\">412\/2511<\/a>: Special reciprocal lease remains subject to rent obligations<\/h3><p>The construction bargain supported an 11-year occupation term outside the ordinary section 538 registration requirement. Recognition of special reciprocal status did not remove the tenant\u2019s duty to pay rent. The Court accepted termination for non-payment under the applicable lease rules. The construction obligation and continuing rental duties must both be considered.<\/p><p><strong>Scope:<\/strong> Le statut sp\u00e9cial ne remet pas en cause les obligations de location du locataire.<\/p><p><strong>Related Code provisions:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-538\/\">article 538<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-560\/\">article 560<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-369\/\">article 369<\/a>. These links include related provisions for comparison and do not mean every provision was applied in the judgment.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/deka.in.th\/deka\/2511-412-68422\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Thai judgment<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">Reciprocal agreements and renewal<\/a><\/p><\/article>\n<article id=\"dika-2759-2534\"><h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/2759-2534-car-park-lease-duration-renewal\/\">2759\/2534<\/a>: Car-park construction does not determine the lease duration<\/h3><p>The tenant\u2019s car-park works supported special reciprocal treatment, but the car park\u2019s own lease terms determined its duration. A separate building arrangement did not extend the car-park occupation period. An invitation to contact the owner about further renting was not an offer whose acceptance created a renewal.<\/p><p><strong>Scope:<\/strong> L'investissement et un bail de b\u00e2timent s\u00e9par\u00e9 n'ont pas \u00e9tabli une dur\u00e9e de parking plus longue.<\/p><p><strong>Related Code provisions:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-538\/\">article 538<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-369\/\">article 369<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-361\/\">article 361<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-540\/\">section 540<\/a>. These links include related provisions for comparison and do not mean every provision was applied in the judgment.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/deka.in.th\/deka\/2534-2759\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Thai judgment<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">Reciprocal agreements and renewal<\/a><\/p><\/article>\n<article id=\"dika-3801-2555\"><h3>3801\/2555: Uncertain rent and duration defeat a renewal claim<\/h3><p>Wording referring to fair adjustments of rent or duration did not settle the essential terms needed for an enforceable renewal commitment. The tenant later proposed terms, but the owner did not accept them. The Court did not treat the clause and unilateral proposal as a completed further lease.<\/p><p><strong>Scope:<\/strong> Une proposition ult\u00e9rieure non accept\u00e9e ne pouvait pas combler le vide.<\/p><p><strong>Related Code provisions:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-537\/\">section 537<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-538\/\">article 538<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-361\/\">article 361<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-366\/\">section 366<\/a>. These links include related provisions for comparison and do not mean every provision was applied in the judgment.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/deka.in.th\/deka\/2555-3801\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Thai judgment<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">Reciprocal agreements and renewal<\/a><\/p><\/article>\n<article id=\"dika-1213-2517\"><h3>1213\/2517\u00a0: D\u00e9c\u00e8s du bailleur connu avant l'acceptation d'une promesse de renouvellement<\/h3><p>The Grand Bench distinguished the original lease from the promise of a later term. Acceptance before the landlord\u2019s death had not been established, and the tenant knew of the death before acceptance. The promise did not bind the heirs. The judgment used the Code numbering then in force; modern section 168 should not be presented as a provision applied by that judgment.<\/p><p><strong>Scope:<\/strong> Distinguer une obligation contractuelle existante d'une promesse attendant encore son acceptation.<\/p><p><strong>Related Code provisions:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-360\/\">article 360<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-169\/\">article 169<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-538\/\">article 538<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-569\/\">article 569<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-1599\/\">article 1599<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-1600\/\">article 1600<\/a>. These links include related provisions for comparison and do not mean every provision was applied in the judgment.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/deka.in.th\/deka\/2517-1213\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Thai judgment<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">Reciprocal agreements and renewal<\/a><\/p><\/article>\n<article id=\"dika-4208-2567\"><h3>4208\/2567: Remand concerning an unresolved counterclaim, not final lease enforcement<\/h3><p>The appeal court had treated the arrangement as a special reciprocal contract supporting a ten-year term. The Supreme Court set aside that judgment and remitted because the counterclaim concerning alleged breach had not been fully decided. The appeal court\u2019s view should not be represented as a final Supreme Court holding enforcing occupation against the estate.<\/p><p><strong>Scope:<\/strong> La d\u00e9cision de la cour d\u2019appel concernant le contrat sp\u00e9cial n\u2019\u00e9tait pas une d\u00e9cision d\u00e9finitive de la Cour supr\u00eame quant au fond.<\/p><p><strong>Related Code provisions:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-538\/\">article 538<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-369\/\">article 369<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-1599\/\">article 1599<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/section-1600\/\">article 1600<\/a>. These links include related provisions for comparison and do not mean every provision was applied in the judgment.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/deka.in.th\/deka\/2567-4208\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Thai judgment<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/reciprocal-agreement-under-thai-law\/\">Reciprocal agreements and renewal<\/a><\/p><\/article>\n<\/section>\n\n\n<div class='tlo-scanner-promo-block' style='background:#faf8f3;border:1px solid #dfd6bf;border-left:4px solid #b3261e;border-radius:4px;padding:1.1rem 1.3rem;margin:1.75rem 0;font-family:inherit;'><p style='margin:0 0 .5rem;font-weight:600;font-size:1.05rem;'>\ud83d\udea9 Outil membre : V\u00e9rifiez votre contrat de location tha\u00eflandais \u00e0 la recherche de clauses abusives<\/p><p style='margin:0 0 .5rem;'>Avant de signer, collez votre bail dans notre scanner de baux par IA. Il v\u00e9rifie les conditions de d\u00e9p\u00f4t de garantie, les clauses de r\u00e9siliation, les obligations de r\u00e9paration, les promesses de renouvellement et l'enregistrement par rapport au Code civil et commercial en vigueur, et vous indique de quelle section de la loi provient chaque probl\u00e8me.<\/p><p style='margin:0 0 .5rem;'><strong>Inclus dans l'abonnement Silver, 1 490 THB par an<\/strong>, moins que le co\u00fbt d'une consultation d'avocat, et cela couvre \u00e9galement la biblioth\u00e8que de mod\u00e8les et les guides r\u00e9serv\u00e9s aux membres. Gold (5 800 THB) ajoute une r\u00e9vision par un avocat de vos documents r\u00e9els.<\/p><p style='margin:0;'>\u0e01\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e40\u0e0b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0d\u0e32\u0e40\u0e0a\u0e48\u0e32 \u0e43\u0e0a\u0e49\u0e40\u0e04\u0e23\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e21\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e15\u0e23\u0e27\u0e08\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0d\u0e32\u0e40\u0e0a\u0e48\u0e32\u0e14\u0e49\u0e27\u0e22 AI \u0e02\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e40\u0e23\u0e32 \u0e15\u0e23\u0e27\u0e08\u0e2a\u0e2d\u0e1a\u0e40\u0e07\u0e34\u0e19\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e01\u0e31\u0e19 \u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e1a\u0e2d\u0e01\u0e40\u0e25\u0e34\u0e01\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0d\u0e32 \u0e04\u0e48\u0e32\u0e0b\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e21\u0e41\u0e0b\u0e21 \u0e41\u0e25\u0e30\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e08\u0e14\u0e17\u0e30\u0e40\u0e1a\u0e35\u0e22\u0e19 \u0e40\u0e17\u0e35\u0e22\u0e1a\u0e01\u0e31\u0e1a\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e21\u0e27\u0e25\u0e01\u0e0e\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e32\u0e22\u0e41\u0e1e\u0e48\u0e07\u0e41\u0e25\u0e30\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e13\u0e34\u0e0a\u0e22\u0e4c \u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e2d\u0e22\u0e39\u0e48\u0e43\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e34\u0e01 Silver \u0e1b\u0e35\u0e25\u0e30 1,490 \u0e1a\u0e32\u0e17<\/p><p style='margin:.6rem 0 0;'><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-lease-scanner\/\" style=\"font-weight:600;\">V\u00e9rifiez votre contrat de location<\/a> &nbsp;\u00b7&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/explaining-our-membership\/\" style=\"font-weight:600;\">Ce que Silver inclut \u2192<\/a><\/p><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Understanding how Thailand\u2019s Supreme Court (often referred to as the Dika Court) interprets lease agreements is crucial for anyone involved [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":629,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":"","rank_math_focus_keyword":"supreme court of thailand","rank_math_title":"Supreme Court Lease Decisions in Thailand - ThaiLawOnline","rank_math_description":"Thai Supreme Court rulings on leases summarised: leases as personal rights, what happens on death, renewal promises, and the thirty year limit.","rank_math_breadcrumb_title":"Supreme Court of Thailand","rank_math_canonical_url":""},"class_list":["post-245","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","pmpro-has-access"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/245","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=245"}],"version-history":[{"count":22,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/245\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9422,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/245\/revisions\/9422"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/629"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=245"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}