{"id":90,"date":"2026-02-22T03:04:58","date_gmt":"2026-02-21T20:04:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/supreme-court-prenuptial-agreements-thailand\/"},"modified":"2026-09-05T19:37:45","modified_gmt":"2026-09-05T12:37:45","slug":"supreme-court-prenuptial-agreements-thailand","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-prenuptial-agreements-thailand\/","title":{"rendered":"D\u00e9cision de la Cour supr\u00eame sur les contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux en Tha\u00eflande\u00a0: Guide complet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>What Thai courts actually say about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/prenuptial\/\">contrats de mariage<\/a>, backed by over 30 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/supreme-court-dika\/\">Cour supr\u00eame<\/a> decisions spanning six decades<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"tlo-hublink wp-block-paragraph\">These decisions sit within the broader framework described in our overview of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-family-law\/\">droit de la famille en Tha\u00eflande<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Derni\u00e8re r\u00e9vision : 31 ao\u00fbt 2026.<\/strong> <strong>Every one of the fourteen Supreme Court decisions cited on this page was checked against our own copy of the judgment<\/strong>, and all fourteen are real, in full text, and described here as they were decided. Sections 1356, 1357, 1463, 1465, 1466, 1467, 1468, 1469, 1471, 1474, 1476, 1477 and 1485 of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/thai-civil-and-commercial-code\/\">Code civil et commercial<\/a> were read against the Thai text in our own annotated Code. <strong>One correction was made at this review:<\/strong> the section number in Dika 4268\/2562 is a provision of the FORMER Book V, which the judgment itself marks <em>(\u0e40\u0e14\u0e34\u0e21)<\/em>, and it is not the section that carries that number today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Prenuptial-Agreement-in-Thailand-768x429.png\" alt=\"Guide juridique sur les contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux en Tha\u00eflande\" class=\"wp-image-31134\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-rank-math-toc-block\" id=\"rank-math-toc\"><h2>Table des mati\u00e8res<\/h2><nav><ul><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#what-is-prenuptial-agreement-thailand\/\">Qu\u2019est-ce qu\u2019un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial en droit tha\u00eflandais\u00a0?<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#legal-requirements-section-1465-1466-1467\">Exigences l\u00e9gales : Articles 1465, 1466 et 1467 du Code civil canadien<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#do-you-need-lawyer-prenup-thailand\">Avez-vous besoin d&#039;un avocat pour signer un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial en Tha\u00eflande\u00a0?<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#supreme-court-decisions-prenuptial-agreement\">D\u00e9cisions de la Cour supr\u00eame concernant les contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux en Tha\u00eflande<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#summary-table-supreme-court-decisions\">Tableau r\u00e9capitulatif\u00a0: Principales d\u00e9cisions de la Cour supr\u00eame concernant les contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#common-reasons-prenup-void-thailand\">Raisons courantes pour lesquelles un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial est d\u00e9clar\u00e9 nul en Tha\u00eflande<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#prenup-vs-post-marriage-agreement\">Contrat pr\u00e9nuptial vs. Contrat de partage des biens apr\u00e8s le mariage<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#international-prenup-thailand\">Contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux internationaux et transfrontaliers<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#faq-prenuptial-agreement-thailand\/\">Questions fr\u00e9quentes sur les contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux en Tha\u00eflande<\/a><\/li><li class=\"\"><a href=\"#where-this-leaves-you\">O\u00f9 cela vous m\u00e8ne-t-il ?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"what-is-prenuptial-agreement-thailand\/\">Qu\u2019est-ce qu\u2019un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial en droit tha\u00eflandais\u00a0?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A\u00a0<strong>contrat pr\u00e9nuptial en Tha\u00eflande<\/strong>\u00a0(connu en tha\u00ef sous le nom de\u00a0<em>\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0d\u0e32\u0e01\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a<\/em>Un contrat de mariage est un contrat juridiquement contraignant entre deux personnes qui ont l&#039;intention de se marier. Certains l&#039;appellent aussi un mariage.\u00a0<strong>contrat pr\u00e9nuptial<\/strong>. Il r\u00e9git la mani\u00e8re dont les biens et les finances seront g\u00e9r\u00e9s pendant la p\u00e9riode de\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/marriage-in-thailand\/\">mariage<\/a>\u00a0et sur\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/divorce-in-thailand\/\">divorce<\/a>\u00a0ou la mort.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sous le\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/\">Code civil et commercial tha\u00eflandais<\/a>\u00a0(CCC), Book V, Family<\/strong>, Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial permet aux couples de d\u00e9roger au r\u00e9gime matrimonial par d\u00e9faut. Sans contrat pr\u00e9nuptial, tous les biens acquis pendant le mariage deviennent la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 de leurs \u00e9poux.\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/marital-property\/\">biens matrimoniaux<\/a> (\u0e2a\u0e34\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a)<\/strong>. Les deux \u00e9poux sont copropri\u00e9taires de ces biens \u00e0 parts \u00e9gales. Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial valide peut modifier ces r\u00e8gles. Par exemple, il peut pr\u00e9server certains biens.\u00a0<strong>propri\u00e9t\u00e9 s\u00e9par\u00e9e (\u0e2a\u0e34\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e48\u0e27\u0e19\u0e15\u0e31\u0e27)<\/strong>. Il peut \u00e9galement d\u00e9signer les biens acquis avant le mariage comme \u00e9tant communs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Les contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux ont pris une importance consid\u00e9rable en Tha\u00eflande. Cela est particuli\u00e8rement vrai pour les mariages internationaux entre un Tha\u00eflandais et un ressortissant \u00e9tranger.\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thailand-land-code\/\">Code foncier<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0restreint la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 fonci\u00e8re \u00e9trang\u00e8re. Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial correctement r\u00e9dig\u00e9 joue un r\u00f4le crucial dans\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/property-guide-for-foreigners-in-thailand\/\">prot\u00e9ger les int\u00e9r\u00eats financiers des deux parties<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"legal-requirements-section-1465-1466-1467\">Legal Requirements: Sections 1465, 1466 &#038; 1467 CCC<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La loi tha\u00eflandaise d\u00e9finit les exigences formelles relatives aux contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux dans trois dispositions cl\u00e9s.\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/book-5-family\/\">Code civil et commercial<\/a><\/strong>. Le non-respect de l&#039;accord le rend caduc.\u00a0<strong>vide (\u0e42\u0e21\u0e06\u0e30)<\/strong>. Le\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/\">Cour supr\u00eame<\/a>\u00a0l&#039;a confirm\u00e9 \u00e0 travers plusieurs d\u00e9cisions marquantes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Comprendre le <strong>D\u00e9cision de la Cour supr\u00eame sur les contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux<\/strong> Il est essentiel de respecter les obligations l\u00e9gales et de prot\u00e9ger vos int\u00e9r\u00eats. L&#039;importance de la d\u00e9cision de la Cour supr\u00eame relative aux contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux est capitale. Cette d\u00e9cision encadre l&#039;interpr\u00e9tation et l&#039;application de ces contrats en Tha\u00eflande.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"section-1465-general-rule-public-policy-limit\">Section 1465: General Rule &#038; Public Policy Limit<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0e21\u0e32\u0e15\u0e23\u0e32 \u0e51\u0e54\u0e56\u0e55 \u0e16\u0e49\u0e32\u0e04\u0e39\u0e48\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e34\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e17\u0e33\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0d\u0e32\u0e01\u0e31\u0e19\u0e44\u0e27\u0e49\u0e43\u0e19\u0e40\u0e23\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e17\u0e23\u0e31\u0e1e\u0e22\u0e4c\u0e2a\u0e34\u0e19\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e40\u0e28\u0e29\u0e01\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a \u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e21\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e19\u0e18\u0e4c\u0e23\u0e30\u0e2b\u0e27\u0e48\u0e32\u0e07\u0e04\u0e39\u0e48\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e43\u0e19\u0e40\u0e23\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e17\u0e23\u0e31\u0e1e\u0e22\u0e4c\u0e2a\u0e34\u0e19\u0e19\u0e31\u0e49\u0e19 \u0e43\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e1a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e31\u0e1a\u0e15\u0e32\u0e21\u0e1a\u0e17\u0e1a\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0d\u0e31\u0e15\u0e34\u0e43\u0e19\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e27\u0e14\u0e19\u0e35\u0e49 \u0e16\u0e49\u0e32\u0e02\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21\u0e43\u0e14\u0e43\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0d\u0e32\u0e01\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e02\u0e31\u0e14\u0e15\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21\u0e2a\u0e07\u0e1a\u0e40\u0e23\u0e35\u0e22\u0e1a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e22\u0e2b\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e28\u0e35\u0e25\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e2d\u0e31\u0e19\u0e14\u0e35\u0e02\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19 \u0e2b\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e23\u0e30\u0e1a\u0e38\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e43\u0e0a\u0e49\u0e01\u0e0e\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e32\u0e22\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e2d\u0e37\u0e48\u0e19\u0e1a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e31\u0e1a\u0e40\u0e23\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e17\u0e23\u0e31\u0e1e\u0e22\u0e4c\u0e2a\u0e34\u0e19\u0e19\u0e31\u0e49\u0e19 \u0e02\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21\u0e19\u0e31\u0e49\u0e19 \u0e46 \u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e42\u0e21\u0e06\u0e30<strong>Article 1465<\/strong>, If spouses have not made a special agreement regarding their property before marriage, the relationship between them concerning property shall be governed by the provisions of this Chapter. Any clause in a prenuptial agreement that is contrary to public order or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/good-morals\/\">bonnes m\u0153urs<\/a>, or that specifies the application of foreign law to govern property matters, shall be void.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cette section \u00e9tablit que les r\u00e8gles par d\u00e9faut relatives aux biens matrimoniaux s&#039;appliquent en l&#039;absence d&#039;un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial valide. Elle impose deux limites essentielles. Premi\u00e8rement, l&#039;accord\u00a0<strong>ne doit pas enfreindre l&#039;ordre public ni les bonnes m\u0153urs<\/strong>. Deuxi\u00e8mement, il\u00a0<strong>ne peut choisir une loi \u00e9trang\u00e8re en vigueur<\/strong>. Toute clause tentant l&#039;une ou l&#039;autre de ces actions est nulle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"section-1466-formal-requirements-for-validity\">Article 1466\u00a0: Exigences formelles de validit\u00e9<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0e21\u0e32\u0e15\u0e23\u0e32 \u0e51\u0e54\u0e56\u0e56 \u0e2a\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0d\u0e32\u0e01\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e42\u0e21\u0e06\u0e30 \u0e16\u0e49\u0e32\u0e21\u0e34\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e08\u0e14\u0e41\u0e08\u0e49\u0e07\u0e02\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e15\u0e01\u0e25\u0e07\u0e01\u0e31\u0e19\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0d\u0e32\u0e01\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e19\u0e31\u0e49\u0e19\u0e44\u0e27\u0e49\u0e43\u0e19\u0e17\u0e30\u0e40\u0e1a\u0e35\u0e22\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e1e\u0e23\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e21\u0e01\u0e31\u0e1a\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e08\u0e14\u0e17\u0e30\u0e40\u0e1a\u0e35\u0e22\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a \u0e2b\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e21\u0e34\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e17\u0e33\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e25\u0e07\u0e25\u0e32\u0e22\u0e21\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e0a\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e04\u0e39\u0e48\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e41\u0e25\u0e30\u0e1e\u0e22\u0e32\u0e19\u0e2d\u0e22\u0e48\u0e32\u0e07\u0e19\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e04\u0e19\u0e41\u0e19\u0e1a\u0e44\u0e27\u0e49\u0e17\u0e49\u0e32\u0e22\u0e17\u0e30\u0e40\u0e1a\u0e35\u0e22\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e41\u0e25\u0e30\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e08\u0e14\u0e44\u0e27\u0e49\u0e43\u0e19\u0e17\u0e30\u0e40\u0e1a\u0e35\u0e22\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e1e\u0e23\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e21\u0e01\u0e31\u0e1a\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e08\u0e14\u0e17\u0e30\u0e40\u0e1a\u0e35\u0e22\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e27\u0e48\u0e32\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e21\u0e35\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0d\u0e32\u0e19\u0e31\u0e49\u0e19\u0e41\u0e19\u0e1a\u0e44\u0e27\u0e49<strong>Article 1466<\/strong>, A prenuptial agreement shall be void unless: (1) the agreement is recorded in the Marriage Register at the time of marriage registration; or (2) the agreement is made in writing, signed by both spouses and at least two witnesses, annexed to the Marriage Register, and noted in the Register at the time of registration that such agreement is annexed thereto.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Les quatre exigences formelles\u00a0:<\/strong><br\/>1. L&#039;accord doit \u00eatre\u00a0<strong>par \u00e9crit<\/strong><br\/>2. Cela doit \u00eatre\u00a0<strong>sign\u00e9 par les deux \u00e9poux<\/strong><br\/>3. Cela doit \u00eatre\u00a0<strong>sign\u00e9 par au moins deux (2) t\u00e9moins<\/strong><br\/>4. Cela doit \u00eatre\u00a0<strong>inscrit au registre des mariages ou annex\u00e9 \u00e0 celui-ci au moment de l&#039;enregistrement du mariage<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">L&#039;article 1466 est la disposition pr\u00e9nuptiale la plus contest\u00e9e en\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/family-law-consultation\/\">droit de la famille tha\u00eflandais<\/a>. La Cour supr\u00eame a constamment statu\u00e9 que le d\u00e9faut de satisfaire\u00a0<em>n&#039;importe lequel<\/em>\u00a0Le respect de ces quatre conditions rend le contrat pr\u00e9nuptial\u00a0<strong>compl\u00e8tement vide<\/strong>. It is not merely <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/void-and-voidable\/\">annulable<\/a>, it is void from the outset (<em>ab initio<\/em>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"section-1467-no-modification-after-marriage-without-court-order\">Article 1467\u00a0: Aucune modification apr\u00e8s le mariage sans d\u00e9cision de justice<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0e21\u0e32\u0e15\u0e23\u0e32 \u0e51\u0e54\u0e56\u0e57 \u0e40\u0e21\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e41\u0e25\u0e49\u0e27\u0e08\u0e30\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e25\u0e35\u0e48\u0e22\u0e19\u0e41\u0e1b\u0e25\u0e07\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e01\u0e16\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0d\u0e32\u0e01\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e19\u0e31\u0e49\u0e19\u0e44\u0e21\u0e48\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49 \u0e19\u0e2d\u0e01\u0e08\u0e32\u0e01\u0e08\u0e30\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e23\u0e31\u0e1a\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e38\u0e0d\u0e32\u0e15\u0e08\u0e32\u0e01\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25 \u0e40\u0e21\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e21\u0e35\u0e04\u0e33\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e48\u0e07\u0e02\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e16\u0e36\u0e07\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48\u0e2a\u0e38\u0e14\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e25\u0e35\u0e48\u0e22\u0e19\u0e41\u0e1b\u0e25\u0e07\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e01\u0e16\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0d\u0e32\u0e01\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e41\u0e25\u0e49\u0e27 \u0e43\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e41\u0e08\u0e49\u0e07\u0e44\u0e1b\u0e22\u0e31\u0e07\u0e19\u0e32\u0e22\u0e17\u0e30\u0e40\u0e1a\u0e35\u0e22\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e08\u0e14\u0e41\u0e08\u0e49\u0e07\u0e44\u0e27\u0e49\u0e43\u0e19\u0e17\u0e30\u0e40\u0e1a\u0e35\u0e22\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a<strong>Article 1467<\/strong>, After the marriage has been effected, the prenuptial agreement cannot be altered or revoked except by order of the Court. When a final court order for alteration or revocation has been made, the Court shall notify the Marriage Registrar to record it in the Marriage Register.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cela signifie qu&#039;une fois mari\u00e9s, aucun des \u00e9poux ne peut modifier ou annuler unilat\u00e9ralement le contrat pr\u00e9nuptial. Seul un\u00a0<strong>ordonnance du tribunal<\/strong>\u00a0Il est possible de le modifier ou de le r\u00e9voquer. Cela souligne l&#039;importance de bien r\u00e9diger un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial.\u00a0<em>avant<\/em>\u00a0le mariage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"do-you-need-lawyer-prenup-thailand\">Avez-vous besoin d&#039;un avocat pour signer un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial en Tha\u00eflande\u00a0?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Voici l&#039;une des questions les plus fr\u00e9quentes que nous recevons chez ThaiLawOnline de la part de ressortissants \u00e9trangers souhaitant se marier en Tha\u00eflande. La r\u00e9ponse courte est\u00a0:\u00a0<strong>Non, la loi tha\u00eflandaise n&#039;exige pas la pr\u00e9sence d&#039;un avocat.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Comme \u00e9tabli par\u00a0<strong>Article 1466 du Code civil canadien<\/strong>, les seules personnes qui doivent signer l&#039;accord sont :<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Signataires requis par la loi tha\u00eflandaise\u00a0:<\/strong><br\/>\u2022 Les deux conjoints (\u0e04\u0e39\u0e48\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a)<br\/>\u2022 Au moins deux t\u00e9moins (\u0e1e\u0e22\u0e32\u0e19\u0e2d\u0e22\u0e48\u0e32\u0e07\u0e19\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e04\u0e19)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Non requis par la loi\u00a0:<\/strong><br\/>\u2022 Un avocat (\u0e17\u0e19\u0e32\u0e22\u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21)<br\/>\u2022 Un notaire public<br\/>\u2022 Tout fonctionnaire du gouvernement (autre que l&#039;officier d&#039;\u00e9tat civil charg\u00e9 de l&#039;enregistrement des mariages)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court has never required a lawyer for validity. In every decision involving prenups, the Court focused exclusively on the four formal requirements of Section 1466. These are: (1) writing, (2) both spouses\u2019 signatures, (3) two witnesses, (4) proper Marriage Register recording.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Recommandation pratique :<\/strong>\u00a0Bien que le recours \u00e0 un avocat ne soit pas obligatoire, nous vous recommandons vivement de consulter un conseiller juridique exp\u00e9riment\u00e9. Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial mal r\u00e9dig\u00e9 peut \u00eatre contest\u00e9 devant les tribunaux. Certaines clauses peuvent \u00eatre d\u00e9clar\u00e9es nulles en vertu de l&#039;article 1465 si elles contreviennent \u00e0 l&#039;ordre public ou aux bonnes m\u0153urs. Un avocat exp\u00e9riment\u00e9\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/how-to-choose-a-lawyer-in-thailand\/\">avocat de famille tha\u00eflandais<\/a>\u00a0Ils veillent \u00e0 la validit\u00e9 de votre contrat. Ils v\u00e9rifient le formatage correct pour l&#039;enregistrement et prot\u00e8gent vos int\u00e9r\u00eats en vertu du droit tha\u00eflandais et international.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"supreme-court-decisions-prenuptial-agreement\">D\u00e9cisions de la Cour supr\u00eame concernant les contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux en Tha\u00eflande<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ce qui suit est une analyse compl\u00e8te des plus importants\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/supreme-court-decisions\/\">D\u00e9cisions de la Cour supr\u00eame (\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e0e\u0e35\u0e01\u0e32)<\/a>\u00a0Ces d\u00e9cisions relatives aux contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux couvrent six d\u00e9cennies et portent sur leur validit\u00e9 formelle, leur ex\u00e9cution, leur modification et leur reconnaissance transfrontali\u00e8re. Elles sont extraites de la base de donn\u00e9es de jurisprudence officielle de Tha\u00eflande.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"1-deka-no-574-2508-1965-admissibility-of-prenuptial-agreement-evidence\">1. Dika No. 574\/2508 (1965), Admissibility of Prenuptial Agreement Evidence<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0e04\u0e33\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e01\u0e29\u0e32\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e0e\u0e35\u0e01\u0e32\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48 574\/2508<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dans cette premi\u00e8re d\u00e9cision, la Cour supr\u00eame a abord\u00e9 la question suivante\u00a0:\u00a0<strong>exigences en mati\u00e8re de preuve<\/strong>\u00a0pour prouver l&#039;existence d&#039;un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial. La plaignante a soumis un\u00a0<em>copie<\/em>\u00a0de l&#039;accord pr\u00e9nuptial. L&#039;original avait \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9 dans une autre affaire pendante devant un autre tribunal. Le d\u00e9fendeur a fait valoir que la copie \u00e9tait irrecevable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La Cour supr\u00eame a statu\u00e9 que lorsque le\u00a0<strong>Les signataires originaux t\u00e9moignent sous serment<\/strong>\u00a0Apr\u00e8s v\u00e9rification de l&#039;exactitude de la copie, celle-ci est admissible comme preuve. La Cour s&#039;est concentr\u00e9e sur le fond et l&#039;authentification par les parties. Elle n&#039;a pas exig\u00e9 l&#039;intervention d&#039;un avocat ou d&#039;un notaire.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Points cl\u00e9s \u00e0 retenir\u00a0:<\/strong>\u00a0Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial peut \u00eatre prouv\u00e9 par une copie certifi\u00e9e conforme si elle est authentifi\u00e9e par les t\u00e9moignages des signataires. Ceci confirme que la loi n&#039;impose pas de formalit\u00e9s suppl\u00e9mentaires \u00e0 celles pr\u00e9vues \u00e0 l&#039;article 1466.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"2-deka-no-1082-2504-1961-prenup-cannot-override-third-party-good-faith\">2. Dika No. 1082\/2504 (1961), Prenup Cannot Override Third-Party Good Faith<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0e04\u0e33\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e01\u0e29\u0e32\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e0e\u0e35\u0e01\u0e32\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48 1082\/2504<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">L&#039;\u00e9pouse poss\u00e9dait des terres avant le mariage et le couple a conclu un accord.\u00a0<strong>Contrat pr\u00e9nuptial<\/strong>\u00a0stipulating that the husband would have no rights over her property. However, the wife allowed the husband to register the land in his own name. The husband subsequently mortgaged it to a third party who acted in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/good-faith\/\">bonne foi<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La Cour supr\u00eame a statu\u00e9 que m\u00eame si un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial existait, le\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/mortgage\/\">hypoth\u00e8que<\/a> was valid and binding on the wife<\/strong>. Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial, bien que valable entre \u00e9poux,\u00a0<strong>ne peut pas faire obstacle aux droits d&#039;un tiers de bonne foi<\/strong>. Le cr\u00e9ancier hypoth\u00e9caire s&#039;\u00e9tait fi\u00e9 de bonne foi au titre de propri\u00e9t\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Points cl\u00e9s \u00e0 retenir\u00a0:<\/strong>\u00a0Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial n&#039;est valable qu&#039;entre \u00e9poux. Ses dispositions ne peuvent \u00eatre opposables aux tiers de bonne foi qui se sont fond\u00e9s sur des documents publics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"3-deka-no-2553-2526-1983-behavioral-clauses-in-a-prenuptial-agreement\">3. Behavioural (Fidelity) Clauses: What the Law Actually Supports<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A prenuptial agreement under Section 1465 governs <strong>property relations<\/strong> between the spouses. A promise about personal conduct, such as fidelity, is not a property term, so it does not gain force from being written into the prenup itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Thai law protects conduct promises through a different instrument: a written <strong>bond of good behaviour (\u0e17\u0e31\u0e13\u0e11\u0e4c\u0e1a\u0e19\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e37\u0e2d)<\/strong>. Sous <strong>Section 1516(8)<\/strong> of the Civil and Commercial Code, breach of such a written bond is itself a statutory ground for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/divorce-in-thailand\/\">divorce<\/a>. The Supreme Court examines these bonds strictly on their facts: in <strong>Dika No. 5161\/2538 (1995)<\/strong> the Court analysed an alleged breach of a written bond and held that the conduct proven did not amount to a breach serious enough to ground divorce. Any monetary penalty attached to such a bond remains subject to the court\u2019s power to reduce excessive penalties (Section 383).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Note (August 2026): an earlier version of this section cited a 1983 decision said to uphold a 50,000-baht fidelity penalty. That citation could not be verified against the Supreme Court database and has been removed. The position above rests on the statutory text of Sections 1465 and 1516(8).<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Points cl\u00e9s \u00e0 retenir\u00a0:<\/strong>\u00a0Keep the prenup for property. If a couple wants consequences for conduct, use a separate written bond of good behaviour, whose breach can serve as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/ground\/\">Motifs de divorce<\/a> under Section 1516(8).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"4-deka-no-3838-2528-1985-prenuptial-agreement-upon-remarriage\">4. Dika No. 3838\/2528 (1985), Prenuptial Agreement Upon Remarriage<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0e04\u0e33\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e01\u0e29\u0e32\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e0e\u0e35\u0e01\u0e32\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48 3838\/2528<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Un couple a divorc\u00e9, puis s&#039;est r\u00e9concili\u00e9 et remari\u00e9 avec un nouveau contrat pr\u00e9nuptial. Le mari y a inclus un\u00a0<strong>lien comportemental (\u0e17\u0e31\u0e13\u0e11\u0e4c\u0e1a\u0e19)<\/strong>\u00a0Il avait promis de ne plus fr\u00e9quenter son ancienne amante. Il a rompu cet engagement, et son \u00e9pouse a demand\u00e9 le divorce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La Cour supr\u00eame a confirm\u00e9 que\u00a0<strong>Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial est pleinement valable en cas de remariage.<\/strong>. Elle doit satisfaire aux exigences de l&#039;article 1466. L&#039;engagement comportemental \u00e9tait ex\u00e9cutoire comme motif de divorce. La Cour a \u00e9galement statu\u00e9 qu&#039;un conjoint qui refuse de proc\u00e9der \u00e0 un divorce par consentement \u00e9crit peut y \u00eatre contraint par une ordonnance du tribunal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Points cl\u00e9s \u00e0 retenir\u00a0:<\/strong>\u00a0Les couples qui divorcent et se remarient peuvent conclure un nouveau contrat pr\u00e9nuptial. Les engagements comportementaux restent valides et applicables.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"5-deka-no-3346-2532-1989-prenup-void-for-failure-to-register\">5. Dika No. 3346\/2532 (1989), Prenup Void for Failure to Register<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0e04\u0e33\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e01\u0e29\u0e32\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e0e\u0e35\u0e01\u0e32\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48 3346\/2532\u00a0VOID<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Il s&#039;agit de l&#039;une des d\u00e9cisions les plus cit\u00e9es concernant les contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux en Tha\u00eflande. Le couple avait conclu un accord stipulant que les biens acquis avant le mariage deviendraient des biens communs. Cependant, ils\u00a0<strong>L&#039;accord n&#039;a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 enregistr\u00e9 dans le registre des mariages.<\/strong>. Ils ne l&#039;ont pas annex\u00e9 avec les signatures requises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La Cour supr\u00eame a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 le contrat pr\u00e9nuptial\u00a0<strong>nul en vertu de l&#039;article 1466 du Code civil canadien<\/strong>. L\u2019\u00e9pouse ne pouvait pr\u00e9tendre \u00e0 aucune part des biens propres de son mari, saisis par les cr\u00e9anciers. La Cour a clairement statu\u00e9\u00a0:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le contrat pr\u00e9nuptial n&#039;a \u00e9t\u00e9 ni inscrit au registre des mariages lors de l&#039;enregistrement de celui-ci, ni \u00e9tabli par \u00e9crit avec les signatures des deux \u00e9poux et d&#039;au moins deux t\u00e9moins, et annex\u00e9 au registre. Par cons\u00e9quent, il est nul en vertu de l&#039;article 1466.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Points cl\u00e9s \u00e0 retenir\u00a0:<\/strong>\u00a0Il s&#039;agit du principal cas confirmant que\u00a0<strong>Le strict respect de l&#039;article 1466 est obligatoire.<\/strong>. M\u00eame un accord authentique entre les parties est nul si les formalit\u00e9s d&#039;enregistrement ne sont pas respect\u00e9es.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"6-deka-no-6711-2537-1994-prenup-recorded-at-registration-is-valid\">6. Dika No. 6711\/2537 (1994), Prenup Recorded at Registration Is Valid<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0e04\u0e33\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e01\u0e29\u0e32\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e0e\u0e35\u0e01\u0e32\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48 6711\/2537\u00a0VALID<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lors de l&#039;enregistrement du mariage, le mari a consenti \u00e0 ce que sa maison et son terrain (qui \u00e9taient sa propri\u00e9t\u00e9 propre) deviennent des biens matrimoniaux.\u00a0<strong>inscrit directement dans le registre des mariages<\/strong>\u00a0au moment de l&#039;inscription.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La Cour supr\u00eame a confirm\u00e9 cela comme un\u00a0<strong>contrat pr\u00e9nuptial valide en vertu de l&#039;article 1466<\/strong>. Recording the agreement in the Marriage Register at the time of registration is sufficient. The clause did not violate public order or good morals under\u00a0Section 1465, paragraph 2. Therefore it was enforceable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Points cl\u00e9s \u00e0 retenir\u00a0:<\/strong>\u00a0Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial n&#039;a pas besoin d&#039;\u00eatre un document \u00e9crit distinct. Il peut \u00eatre valablement \u00e9tabli par\u00a0<strong>l&#039;inscription directe des termes dans le registre des mariages<\/strong>. Il s&#039;agit de la plus simple des deux m\u00e9thodes autoris\u00e9es par l&#039;article 1466.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"7-deka-no-2497-2552-2009-post-registration-agreement-is-not-a-prenup\">7. Dika No. 2497\/2552 (2009), Post-Registration Agreement Is Not a Prenup<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0e04\u0e33\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e01\u0e29\u0e32\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e0e\u0e35\u0e01\u0e32\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48 2497\/2552<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le couple avait initialement indiqu\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#039;officier d&#039;\u00e9tat civil qu&#039;il ne souhaitait pas faire enregistrer d&#039;accord sur les biens. Plus tard\u00a0<em>le m\u00eame jour<\/em>, Ils revinrent et demand\u00e8rent au conservateur des hypoth\u00e8ques d&#039;ajouter une mention. Cette mention stipulait que le mari transf\u00e9rerait le terrain \u00e0 son \u00e9pouse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La Cour supr\u00eame a statu\u00e9 que c&#039;\u00e9tait\u00a0<strong>ne constitue pas un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial au sens de l&#039;article 1466<\/strong>. It was not recorded \u201cat the time of marriage registration\u201d but added later. Instead, the Court classified it as a\u00a0<strong>accord sur les biens du conjoint en vertu de l&#039;article 1469<\/strong>. Chacun des \u00e9poux peut r\u00e9voquer ce contrat pendant le mariage ou dans l&#039;ann\u00e9e suivant sa dissolution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Points cl\u00e9s \u00e0 retenir\u00a0:<\/strong>\u00a0Le timing est crucial. Un accord immobilier enregistr\u00e9\u00a0<strong>apr\u00e8s<\/strong>\u00a0L&#039;enregistrement du mariage n&#039;est pas un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial. Il est soumis \u00e0 des r\u00e8gles diff\u00e9rentes, notamment la possibilit\u00e9 d&#039;\u00eatre r\u00e9vocable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"8-deka-no-1523-2565-2022-cross-border-prenup-thailand-sweden\">8. Dika No. 1523\/2565 (2022), Cross-Border Prenup (Thailand-Sweden)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0e04\u0e33\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e01\u0e29\u0e32\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e0e\u0e35\u0e01\u0e32\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48 1523\/2565<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A Thai woman and a Swedish man lived together and ran a restaurant business in Sweden. <strong>The order of events decides this case.<\/strong> The land and house in Thailand were bought on <strong>14 March 2011<\/strong>, using funds the couple had earned together while cohabiting. They registered their marriage in Sweden only afterwards, on <strong>7 December 2014<\/strong>, et\u00a0<strong>ont conclu un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial conform\u00e9ment au droit su\u00e9dois<\/strong> at that point, stipulating that the restaurant business was the husband\u2019s separate property. Because the purchase came first, the property was never marital property acquired during a marriage, so the marital property regime did not reach it and ordinary co-ownership did. The husband, being a foreigner, could not hold Thai land title. Therefore he placed it in the wife\u2019s name.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La Cour supr\u00eame a examin\u00e9 le fond des accords financiers. Elle a analys\u00e9 les flux de fonds et les intentions r\u00e9elles des parties. Malgr\u00e9 le contrat pr\u00e9nuptial d\u00e9signant l&#039;entreprise comme bien propre, la Cour a constat\u00e9 que les fonds utilis\u00e9s pour acqu\u00e9rir le bien immobilier tha\u00eflandais provenaient de\u00a0<strong>revenus per\u00e7us conjointement pendant la cohabitation<\/strong>. This made the wife a co-owner of one half under\u00a0Sections 1356 and 1357 CCC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The outcome: the Swedish partner lost at every level and recovered nothing.<\/strong> Le <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/loan-agreement\/\">contrat de pr\u00eat<\/a> he had her sign, which he sued on to recover the purchase money, was held to be a sham and void under Section 155 paragraph 1 of the Civil and Commercial Code. This decision is often cited the other way round, as authority that a foreign funder can reclaim the money, and it is not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Points cl\u00e9s \u00e0 retenir\u00a0:<\/strong>\u00a0Les tribunaux tha\u00eflandais examineront l&#039;affaire.\u00a0<strong>substance des accords financiers<\/strong>\u00a0M\u00eame en pr\u00e9sence d&#039;un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial \u00e9tranger, un tel contrat ne d\u00e9termine pas automatiquement les droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 sur les biens situ\u00e9s en Tha\u00eflande. Les tribunaux tha\u00eflandais appliquent les principes du droit immobilier tha\u00eflandais et accordent une attention particuli\u00e8re \u00e0 la provenance des fonds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"9-deka-no-416-2538-1995-joint-management-without-a-prenup\">9. Dika No. 416\/2538 (1995), Joint Management Without a Prenup<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0e04\u0e33\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e01\u0e29\u0e32\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e0e\u0e35\u0e01\u0e32\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48 416\/2538<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La Cour a confirm\u00e9 le principe g\u00e9n\u00e9ral dans le Livre V r\u00e9vis\u00e9 du Code civil (1976) : sauf si\u00a0<strong>le contrat pr\u00e9nuptial pr\u00e9voit le contraire<\/strong>, both spouses must jointly manage marital property. This applies under\u00a0Sections 1476 and 1477. This includes the power to dispose of marital property. A sale of marital property by one spouse without the other\u2019s consent is not automatically void. However, it requires ratification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Points cl\u00e9s \u00e0 retenir\u00a0:<\/strong>\u00a0En l&#039;absence de contrat pr\u00e9nuptial, la loi tha\u00eflandaise exige\u00a0<strong>gestion conjointe des biens matrimoniaux<\/strong>. Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial peut d\u00e9signer un conjoint comme gestionnaire exclusif de certains biens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"10-deka-no-101-2510-1967-prenup-required-for-sole-management-rights\">10. Dika No. 101\/2510 (1967), Prenup Required for Sole Management Rights<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0e04\u0e33\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e01\u0e29\u0e32\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e0e\u0e35\u0e01\u0e32\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48 101\/2510<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le mari a saisi le tribunal afin d&#039;\u00eatre officiellement nomm\u00e9 administrateur unique du patrimoine matrimonial. Il affirmait que son \u00e9pouse s&#039;ing\u00e9rait dans ses affaires. Le tribunal a statu\u00e9 qu&#039;en l&#039;absence de contrat pr\u00e9nuptial conf\u00e9rant \u00e0 l&#039;\u00e9pouse des pouvoirs d&#039;administration, le mari ne pouvait \u00eatre nomm\u00e9 administrateur unique du patrimoine matrimonial.\u00a0<strong>Le mari (en vertu de l&#039;ancienne loi) avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 le droit l\u00e9gal de g\u00e9rer<\/strong>. Sa p\u00e9tition \u00e9tait donc inutile.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Points cl\u00e9s \u00e0 retenir\u00a0:<\/strong>\u00a0En vertu de la loi ant\u00e9rieure \u00e0 1976, le mari \u00e9tait d\u00e9sign\u00e9 comme gestionnaire par d\u00e9faut du bien. En vertu de la loi actuelle (post\u00e9rieure \u00e0 1976), la gestion est partag\u00e9e, sauf si\u2026\u00a0<strong>Contrat pr\u00e9nuptial<\/strong>\u00a0pr\u00e9voit le contraire.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"additional-significant-decisions\">Autres d\u00e9cisions importantes<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"deka-no-3445-2524-1981\">Dika n\u00b0 3445\/2524 (1981)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La Cour a confirm\u00e9 que, selon le Code civil r\u00e9vis\u00e9, le principe g\u00e9n\u00e9ral est\u00a0<strong>gestion conjointe par les deux \u00e9poux<\/strong>. Cela s&#039;applique sauf en cas de contrat pr\u00e9nuptial ou\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/postnuptial-agreement-in-thailand\/\">accord post-mariage<\/a>\u00a0provides otherwise. Either spouse may petition the court under\u00a0Section 1485. This is for sole management of specific valuable assets, regardless of what the prenup says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"deka-no-3092-2530-1987\">Dika n\u00b0 3092\/2530 (1987)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">En vertu de l&#039;ancien article 1468, le mari avait le pouvoir exclusif de g\u00e9rer le patrimoine matrimonial, sauf si\u00a0<strong>contrat pr\u00e9nuptial pr\u00e9vu autrement<\/strong>. La Cour a jug\u00e9 qu&#039;une hypoth\u00e8que consentie par le mari seul sur un bien matrimonial \u00e9tait valable et opposable \u00e0 l&#039;\u00e9pouse. En effet, aucun contrat pr\u00e9nuptial n&#039;avait modifi\u00e9 le pouvoir de gestion par d\u00e9faut de ce bien.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"deka-no-4268-2562-2019\">Dika n\u00b0 4268\/2562 (2019)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court held that when a couple cohabited before marriage without a prenuptial agreement, and then married, the property they had acquired together beforehand was already theirs in co-ownership, and on marriage it became\u00a0<strong>\u0e2a\u0e34\u0e19\u0e40\u0e14\u0e34\u0e21 (actifs ant\u00e9rieurs)<\/strong>\u00a0sous\u00a0<strong>Section 1463(1) of the FORMER Book V<\/strong>, which the judgment cites as <em>(\u0e40\u0e14\u0e34\u0e21)<\/em>. It is not marital property. <strong>Do not look that number up in the Code as it stands today:<\/strong> the couple married in 1974 and the case is decided on the pre-1976 provisions, and the present section 1463 is about guardianship of a spouse adjudged incompetent. The equivalent idea in the current Code is <em>p\u00e9ch\u00e9 suan tua<\/em> under section 1471(1), property belonging to either spouse before marriage. The absence of a prenuptial agreement was noted as a factual finding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"deka-no-1704-2527-1984\">Dika n\u00b0 1704\/2527 (1984)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">En l&#039;absence de contrat pr\u00e9nuptial relatif \u00e0 la gestion des biens, le mari (en vertu des dispositions transitoires) conservait l&#039;autorit\u00e9 exclusive. Il pouvait g\u00e9rer et disposer des biens matrimoniaux, y compris vendre les terrains. Ceci \u00e9tait valable m\u00eame si le nom de l&#039;\u00e9pouse figurait sur le titre de propri\u00e9t\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"summary-table-supreme-court-decisions\">Tableau r\u00e9capitulatif\u00a0: Principales d\u00e9cisions de la Cour supr\u00eame concernant les contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\">D\u00e9cision<\/th><th class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\">Ann\u00e9e<\/th><th class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\">Probl\u00e8me central<\/th><th class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\">R\u00e9sultat<\/th><th class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\">Sections cl\u00e9s<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>574\/2508<\/strong><\/td><td>1965<\/td><td>Recevabilit\u00e9 de la copie du contrat pr\u00e9nuptial comme preuve<\/td><td>Copie admissible avec t\u00e9moignage de la partie<\/td><td>, <\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>1082\/2504<\/strong><\/td><td>1961<\/td><td>Contrat pr\u00e9nuptial contre tiers de bonne foi<\/td><td>L&#039;hypoth\u00e8que d&#039;un tiers a \u00e9t\u00e9 maintenue malgr\u00e9 le contrat pr\u00e9nuptial.<\/td><td>, <\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>101\/2510<\/strong><\/td><td>1967<\/td><td>Gestion exclusive sans contrat pr\u00e9nuptial<\/td><td>Le mari disposait d\u00e9j\u00e0 de droits de gestion par d\u00e9faut<\/td><td>art. 1468 (ancien)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>5161\/2538<\/strong><\/td><td>1995<\/td><td>Alleged breach of written good-behaviour bond<\/td><td>Bond recognized; breach not established on the facts<\/td><td>art. 1516(8)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>3838\/2528<\/strong><\/td><td>1985<\/td><td>Contrat pr\u00e9nuptial sur le remariage avec engagement comportemental<\/td><td>VALID, fully enforceable<\/td><td>art. 1466, art. 1514<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>3346\/2532<\/strong><\/td><td>1989<\/td><td>Contrat pr\u00e9nuptial non enregistr\u00e9 au registre des mariages<\/td><td>VOID, failed Section 1466<\/td><td>art. 1466<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>6711\/2537<\/strong><\/td><td>1994<\/td><td>Contrat enregistr\u00e9 directement au registre des mariages<\/td><td>VALID, Section 1466 satisfied<\/td><td>art. 1465, art. 1466<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>416\/2538<\/strong><\/td><td>1995<\/td><td>Principe de gestion conjointe sans contrat pr\u00e9nuptial<\/td><td>Les deux \u00e9poux doivent g\u00e9rer conjointement<\/td><td>art. 1476, art. 1477<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>2497\/2552<\/strong><\/td><td>2009<\/td><td>Accord ajout\u00e9 apr\u00e8s l&#039;inscription (le m\u00eame jour)<\/td><td>Not a prenup, classified as s.1469 agreement<\/td><td>art. 1466, art. 1469<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>1523\/2565<\/strong><\/td><td>2022<\/td><td>Contrat pr\u00e9nuptial transfrontalier (Su\u00e8de) ; propri\u00e9t\u00e9 en Tha\u00eflande<\/td><td>Les tribunaux tha\u00eflandais ont appliqu\u00e9 le droit de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 tha\u00eflandais et examin\u00e9 la provenance des fonds.<\/td><td>art. 1356, art. 1357<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>3445\/2524<\/strong><\/td><td>1981<\/td><td>La gestion conjointe est la r\u00e8gle par d\u00e9faut<\/td><td>Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial peut modifier les droits de gestion<\/td><td>art. 1476, art. 1485<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>3092\/2530<\/strong><\/td><td>1987<\/td><td>Gestion exclusive par le mari en vertu de l&#039;ancienne loi<\/td><td>Pas de contrat pr\u00e9nuptial = le mari se d\u00e9brouille seul (avant 1976)<\/td><td>art. 1468 (ancien)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>4268\/2562<\/strong><\/td><td>2019<\/td><td>Absence de contrat pr\u00e9nuptial ; classification des biens pr\u00e9nuptiaux<\/td><td>Biens acquis conjointement avant le mariage = copropri\u00e9t\u00e9<\/td><td>s.1463(1) (former), now s.1471(1)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>1704\/2527<\/strong><\/td><td>1984<\/td><td>Disposition des biens matrimoniaux sans contrat pr\u00e9nuptial<\/td><td>En vertu de l&#039;ancienne loi, le mari pouvait vendre seul le terrain.<\/td><td>art. 1476, art. 1477<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"common-reasons-prenup-void-thailand\">Raisons courantes pour lesquelles un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial est d\u00e9clar\u00e9 nul en Tha\u00eflande<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">D\u2019apr\u00e8s les d\u00e9cisions de la Cour supr\u00eame analys\u00e9es ci-dessus, il existe quatre raisons principales pour lesquelles les tribunaux tha\u00eflandais d\u00e9clarent un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial nul\u00a0:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"1-failure-to-register-at-the-time-of-marriage-registration\">1. D\u00e9faut d&#039;inscription au moment de l&#039;enregistrement du mariage<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Il s&#039;agit de la cause la plus fr\u00e9quente d&#039;invalidit\u00e9. Comme \u00e9tabli dans\u00a0<strong>Dika 3346\/2532<\/strong>, if the agreement is not recorded in the Marriage Register, it is void. There is no \u201cgrace period.\u201d As confirmed by\u00a0<strong>Dika 2497\/2552<\/strong>, m\u00eame en revenant plus tard dans la m\u00eame journ\u00e9e, il est trop tard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"2-missing-signatures-spouses-or-witnesses\">2. Signatures manquantes (conjoints ou t\u00e9moins)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">L&#039;article 1466 exige la signature des deux \u00e9poux et d&#039;au moins deux t\u00e9moins sur l&#039;accord \u00e9crit. Si le document annex\u00e9 ne comporte pas l&#039;une de ces signatures, l&#039;accord est nul.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"3-clauses-violating-public-order-or-good-morals\">3. Clauses portant atteinte \u00e0 l&#039;ordre public ou aux bonnes m\u0153urs<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">En vertu de l&#039;article 1465, toute clause qui enfreint\u00a0<em>\u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21\u0e2a\u0e07\u0e1a\u0e40\u0e23\u0e35\u0e22\u0e1a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e22\u0e2b\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e28\u0e35\u0e25\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e2d\u0e31\u0e19\u0e14\u0e35\u0e02\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19<\/em>\u00a0(public order or good morals) is void. The safest course is to keep conduct promises out of the property prenup entirely and record them, if wanted, in a separate written bond of good behaviour recognized by Section 1516(8).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"4-attempting-to-apply-foreign-law\">4. Tentative d&#039;application du droit \u00e9tranger<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">L&#039;article 1465 stipule clairement qu&#039;une clause visant \u00e0 appliquer une loi \u00e9trang\u00e8re au r\u00e9gime matrimonial en Tha\u00eflande est nulle. Ceci est particuli\u00e8rement pertinent pour les couples internationaux ayant sign\u00e9 un contrat de mariage dans leur pays d&#039;origine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"prenup-vs-post-marriage-agreement\">Contrat pr\u00e9nuptial vs. Contrat de partage des biens apr\u00e8s le mariage<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le droit tha\u00eflandais reconna\u00eet deux types distincts d&#039;accords patrimoniaux entre \u00e9poux. La Cour supr\u00eame a pris soin de les distinguer\u00a0:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\">Fonctionnalit\u00e9<\/th><th class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\">Contrat pr\u00e9nuptial (art. 1465-1467)<\/th><th class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\">Contrat post-mariage (art. 1469)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Timing<\/strong><\/td><td>Doit \u00eatre fait au moment de l&#039;enregistrement du mariage ou avant.<\/td><td>Fabriqu\u00e9 apr\u00e8s le mariage<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Inscription<\/strong><\/td><td>Doit \u00eatre inscrit au registre des mariages au moment de l&#039;enregistrement<\/td><td>Aucune inscription requise<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>R\u00e9vocabilit\u00e9<\/strong><\/td><td>Ne peut \u00eatre modifi\u00e9 sans ordonnance du tribunal (art. 1467)<\/td><td>Chacun des \u00e9poux peut r\u00e9voquer \u00e0 tout moment pendant le mariage ou dans l&#039;ann\u00e9e qui suit (art. 1469).<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>force de liaison<\/strong><\/td><td>Irr\u00e9vocable entre \u00e9poux<\/td><td>R\u00e9vocable ; faible force ex\u00e9cutoire<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>\u00c9tui cl\u00e9<\/strong><\/td><td>Dika 3346\/2532, 6711\/2537<\/td><td>Dika 2497\/2552<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Comme\u00a0<strong>Dika 2497\/2552<\/strong>\u00a0Comme le d\u00e9montre la jurisprudence de la Cour supr\u00eame, le d\u00e9lai est interpr\u00e9t\u00e9 de mani\u00e8re stricte. Un accord conclu m\u00eame quelques heures apr\u00e8s l&#039;enregistrement du mariage est\u00a0<em>pas<\/em>\u00a0un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial. Il est donc r\u00e9vocable en vertu de l&#039;article 1469.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"international-prenup-thailand\">International &#038; Cross-Border Prenuptial Agreements<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pour les ressortissants \u00e9trangers qui \u00e9pousent un citoyen tha\u00eflandais, la validit\u00e9 d&#039;un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial conclu \u00e0 l&#039;\u00e9tranger est un enjeu crucial. Selon la jurisprudence de la Cour supr\u00eame\u00a0:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial \u00e9tranger peut \u00eatre reconnu en Tha\u00eflande.<\/strong>, mais les tribunaux tha\u00eflandais appliqueront le droit tha\u00eflandais pour d\u00e9terminer les droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 sur les biens situ\u00e9s en Tha\u00eflande. Cela a \u00e9t\u00e9 clairement indiqu\u00e9 dans\u00a0<strong>Dika 1523\/2565<\/strong>. La Cour a reconnu l&#039;existence d&#039;un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial \u00e9tabli selon le droit su\u00e9dois. Cependant, elle a finalement appliqu\u00e9 les principes du droit de la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 tha\u00eflandais (analyse de la provenance des fonds) pour d\u00e9terminer la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 du terrain situ\u00e9 en Tha\u00eflande.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">De plus, sous\u00a0<strong>Article 1465<\/strong>, Toute clause stipulant l&#039;application d&#039;une loi \u00e9trang\u00e8re en mati\u00e8re de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 est nulle. M\u00eame si votre contrat pr\u00e9nuptial a \u00e9t\u00e9 valablement \u00e9tabli dans un autre pays, les tribunaux tha\u00eflandais n&#039;appliqueront pas une clause de choix de loi. Ceci s&#039;applique aux questions de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 en Tha\u00eflande.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Conseils pratiques pour les couples internationaux\u00a0:<\/strong>\u00a0Si vous poss\u00e9dez ou envisagez d&#039;acqu\u00e9rir un bien immobilier en Tha\u00eflande, nous vous recommandons de faire appel \u00e0 un conseiller.\u00a0<strong>contrat pr\u00e9nuptial tha\u00eflandais s\u00e9par\u00e9<\/strong>. Cet accord doit \u00eatre conforme \u00e0 l&#039;article 1466. Signez-le en compl\u00e9ment de tout contrat pr\u00e9nuptial de votre pays d&#039;origine. Cette approche par un double accord offre la protection la plus solide possible devant les deux syst\u00e8mes juridiques. Elle peut \u00e9galement aborder des questions cl\u00e9s comme\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/buying-a-condominium-in-thailand\/\">l&#039;achat d&#039;un condominium<\/a>\u00a0ou de prot\u00e9ger les int\u00e9r\u00eats d&#039;un \u00e9tranger sur le territoire tha\u00eflandais.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"faq-prenuptial-agreement-thailand\/\">Questions fr\u00e9quentes sur les contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux en Tha\u00eflande<\/h2>\n\n\n<div id=\"rank-math-faq\" class=\"rank-math-block\">\n<div class=\"rank-math-list\">\n<div id=\"faq-question-1771703822640\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question\">Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial est-il juridiquement contraignant en Tha\u00eflande\u00a0?<\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer\">\n\n<p>Oui. Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial est pleinement ex\u00e9cutoire en Tha\u00eflande \u00e0 condition qu&#039;il respecte les exigences formelles de l&#039;article 1466 de la loi.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thai-civil-code\/\">Code civil et commercial<\/a>. L\u2019accord doit \u00eatre \u00e9tabli par \u00e9crit, sign\u00e9 par les deux \u00e9poux et au moins deux t\u00e9moins, et enregistr\u00e9 au registre des mariages ou y \u00eatre annex\u00e9 lors de la c\u00e9l\u00e9bration du mariage. De plus, ses termes ne doivent pas contrevenir \u00e0 l\u2019ordre public ni aux bonnes m\u0153urs, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 1465.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1771703834554\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question\">Ai-je besoin d&#039;un avocat pour signer un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial en Tha\u00eflande\u00a0?<\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer\">\n\n<p>Non. La loi tha\u00eflandaise exige uniquement les signatures des deux \u00e9poux et d&#039;au moins deux t\u00e9moins. Aucun avocat, notaire ou fonctionnaire (hormis l&#039;officier d&#039;\u00e9tat civil) n&#039;est requis. Toutefois, il est fortement recommand\u00e9 de faire appel \u00e0 un avocat sp\u00e9cialis\u00e9 en droit de la famille afin de garantir la validit\u00e9 de l&#039;accord devant les tribunaux. Pour obtenir de l&#039;aide, consultez un avocat sp\u00e9cialis\u00e9.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/legal-services-in-bangkok\/\">services juridiques<\/a>\u00a0ou organiser un\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/online-consultation-with-a-thai-lawyer\/\">consultation en ligne avec un avocat tha\u00eflandais<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1771703835640\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question\">Puis-je modifier mon contrat pr\u00e9nuptial apr\u00e8s le mariage\u00a0?<\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer\">\n\n<p>Uniquement sur ordonnance du tribunal. Conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l&#039;article 1467 du Code civil, une fois mari\u00e9s, le contrat pr\u00e9nuptial ne peut \u00eatre modifi\u00e9 ni r\u00e9voqu\u00e9 sans autorisation du tribunal. Le tribunal en informera alors l&#039;officier d&#039;\u00e9tat civil afin que ce dernier mette \u00e0 jour le registre. En savoir plus\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/what-to-know-before-you-go-to-court-in-thailand\/\">compara\u00eetre devant un tribunal en Tha\u00eflande<\/a>\u00a0si vous devez modifier votre accord.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1771703853654\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question\">Que se passe-t-il si mon contrat pr\u00e9nuptial n&#039;est pas enregistr\u00e9 au moment du mariage\u00a0?<\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer\">\n\n<p>Il est nul. La Cour supr\u00eame a confirm\u00e9 dans l&#039;arr\u00eat Dika 3346\/2532 qu&#039;un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial non inscrit au registre des mariages lors de l&#039;enregistrement de ce dernier est automatiquement nul en vertu de l&#039;article 1466. Aucun d\u00e9lai de gr\u00e2ce n&#039;est accord\u00e9. M\u00eame le fait de revenir plus tard dans la journ\u00e9e pour ajouter le contrat est insuffisant, comme l&#039;a \u00e9tabli l&#039;arr\u00eat Dika 2497\/2552.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1771703907794\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question\">Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial conclu \u00e0 l&#039;\u00e9tranger est-il valable en Tha\u00eflande\u00a0?<\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer\">\n\n<p>Cela d\u00e9pend. Les tribunaux tha\u00eflandais peuvent reconna\u00eetre un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial \u00e9tranger, mais ils appliqueront le droit tha\u00eflandais pour d\u00e9terminer les droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 sur les biens situ\u00e9s en Tha\u00eflande. Toute clause visant \u00e0 appliquer le droit \u00e9tranger aux questions de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 tha\u00eflandaises est nulle en vertu de l&#039;article 1465. Pour une protection maximale, les couples internationaux devraient conclure un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial s\u00e9par\u00e9.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/prenuptial-agreement-thailand\/\">contrat pr\u00e9nuptial conforme \u00e0 la r\u00e9glementation tha\u00eflandaise<\/a>\u00a0en plus de leur accord avec leur pays d&#039;origine.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1771703908657\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question\">Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial peut-il inclure des clauses relatives au comportement ou \u00e0 la fid\u00e9lit\u00e9\u00a0?<\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer\">\n\n<p>Not in the prenup itself: a Thai prenup governs property relations only (Section 1465). If a couple wants consequences for conduct such as adultery, Thai law recognizes a separate written bond of good behaviour, whose breach is a statutory ground for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/divorce-in-thailand\/\">divorce<\/a> under Section 1516(8) CCC. Courts examine such bonds strictly (Dika 5161\/2538) and can reduce excessive monetary penalties (Section 383).<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1772038279868\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question\">Quelle est la diff\u00e9rence entre un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial et un contrat post-nuptial\u00a0?<\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer\">\n\n<p>Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial (articles 1465 \u00e0 1467) doit \u00eatre enregistr\u00e9 au moment du mariage et ne peut \u00eatre modifi\u00e9 que par d\u00e9cision de justice.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/postnuptial-agreement-in-thailand\/\">accord de partage des biens apr\u00e8s le mariage<\/a>\u00a0Le contrat de mariage (article 1469) est conclu apr\u00e8s le mariage et peut \u00eatre r\u00e9voqu\u00e9 par l&#039;un ou l&#039;autre des \u00e9poux \u00e0 tout moment pendant le mariage ou dans l&#039;ann\u00e9e suivant sa dissolution. Les contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux offrent une protection bien plus solide car ils sont irr\u00e9vocables sans l&#039;approbation d&#039;un tribunal.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1772038281587\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question\">Combien de t\u00e9moins sont requis pour un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial tha\u00eflandais\u00a0?<\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer\">\n\n<p>Conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l&#039;article 1466 du Code civil canadien, au moins deux t\u00e9moins doivent signer le contrat pr\u00e9nuptial. Il n&#039;est pas n\u00e9cessaire que les t\u00e9moins soient avocats, parents ou fonctionnaires. Toute personne majeure et capable peut servir de t\u00e9moin. Pour les documents importants,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/notary-services-thailand\/\">services notariaux<\/a>\u00a0peut aider \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier l&#039;authenticit\u00e9 des t\u00e9moins, mais la pr\u00e9sence d&#039;un notaire n&#039;est pas obligatoire en vertu de la loi tha\u00eflandaise.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1772038323734\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question\">Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial peut-il prot\u00e9ger l&#039;investissement d&#039;un \u00e9tranger dans l&#039;immobilier tha\u00eflandais\u00a0?<\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer\">\n\n<p>Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial peut contribuer \u00e0 prot\u00e9ger les int\u00e9r\u00eats financiers d&#039;un \u00e9tranger, mais il ne peut d\u00e9roger aux restrictions du Code foncier relatives \u00e0 la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 fonci\u00e8re \u00e9trang\u00e8re. Comme l&#039;indique l&#039;arr\u00eat Dika 1523\/2565, les tribunaux tha\u00eflandais examinent la provenance r\u00e9elle des fonds utilis\u00e9s pour l&#039;acquisition d&#039;un bien immobilier. Ceci est valable ind\u00e9pendamment des stipulations du contrat pr\u00e9nuptial. Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial bien r\u00e9dig\u00e9 peut d\u00e9finir clairement les modalit\u00e9s de transmission du bien immobilier.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/divorce-in-thailand\/\">divorce<\/a>. Cependant, un \u00e9tranger ne peut toujours pas poss\u00e9der directement de terres en Tha\u00eflande. En savoir plus\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/property-guide-for-foreigners-in-thailand\/\">droit de la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 en Tha\u00eflande<\/a>\u00a0ET\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/buying-a-house-in-thailand\/\">acheter une maison<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"faq-question-1772038351434\" class=\"rank-math-list-item\">\n<h3 class=\"rank-math-question\">Un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial doit-il \u00eatre r\u00e9dig\u00e9 en tha\u00ef ?<\/h3>\n<div class=\"rank-math-answer\">\n\n<p>While there is no statutory requirement that the agreement be in Thai, the Marriage Register at the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/glossary\/amphoe-or-amphur-district-office\/\">Amphur<\/a> (district office) is maintained in Thai. For practical purposes, the agreement should be in Thai or bilingual Thai-English. This ensures the Marriage Registrar can verify and record it. If only an English version exists, it may need to be translated by a certified translator before it can be annexed to the Register.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"where-this-leaves-you\">O\u00f9 cela vous m\u00e8ne-t-il ?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Thailand\u2019s Supreme Court has built a detailed, practical body of law around prenuptial agreements. The decisions in our database cover topics from registration requirements to international property disputes to same-sex partnerships. Taken together, they offer a clear picture of what Thai courts expect, what they enforce, and what they reject.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le point essentiel de ces d\u00e9cisions est le suivant\u00a0: les tribunaux tha\u00eflandais respectent les contrats pr\u00e9nuptiaux, \u00e0 condition que les formalit\u00e9s requises soient accomplies. Le contrat doit porter exclusivement sur les biens. Les deux \u00e9poux doivent s\u2019y conformer. Les tribunaux ne pourront pas valider un contrat mal r\u00e9dig\u00e9 ni faire appliquer un contrat que les parties elles-m\u00eames ont ignor\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you are considering a prenuptial agreement in Thailand, you may need legal guidance. With 20 years of experience in Thai family law, ThaiLawOnline has helped hundreds of international and Thai couples draft, review, and register legally bulletproof prenuptial agreements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Our bilingual legal team ensures your prenup complies with Sections 1465-1467 CCC, is properly registered at the Amphur, and protects your assets under both Thai and international law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/start-your-case\/\">Contactez-nous d\u00e8s maintenant pour un contrat pr\u00e9nuptial en Tha\u00eflande<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mfa.go.th\/en\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Minist\u00e8re des Affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res de Tha\u00eflande (anglais)<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What Thai courts actually say about prenups, backed by over 30 Supreme Court decisions spanning six decades These decisions sit [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":481,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":"","rank_math_focus_keyword":"prenuptial thailand","rank_math_title":"Supreme Court Prenup Decisions Thailand - ThaiLawOnline","rank_math_description":"Thai Supreme Court decisions on prenuptial agreements: the CCC sections 1465 to 1467 requirements, registration timing, and how clauses were treated.","rank_math_breadcrumb_title":"Prenuptial Thailand","rank_math_canonical_url":""},"class_list":["post-90","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","pmpro-has-access"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/90","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/90\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6904,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/90\/revisions\/6904"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/481"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}