{"id":3129,"date":"2026-08-01T02:54:19","date_gmt":"2026-07-31T19:54:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/?p=3129"},"modified":"2026-08-06T18:41:33","modified_gmt":"2026-08-06T11:41:33","slug":"thailand-visa-changes-2026-dtv","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/fr\/thailand-visa-changes-2026-dtv\/","title":{"rendered":"Thailand’s 2026 Visa Shake-Up: The 30-Day Rule and Why the DTV Now Matters"},"content":{"rendered":"

What Cabinet actually approved<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thailand introduced a 60-day visa exemption in July 2024 covering 93 countries. It was generous by regional standards, and predictably it was used for purposes the scheme was never designed to serve. People strung entries together to live in Thailand more or less permanently without ever holding a visa.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"30-Day
30-Day Rule Thailand Rule<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Cabinet has now approved a rebuild. The replacement framework applies a stated principle of one country, one entry category, and it sorts 65 countries and territories into three tiers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fonctionnalit\u00e9<\/th>Now (still in force)<\/th>After gazettal (approved)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Visa-free stay<\/td>60 jours<\/strong><\/td>30 jours<\/strong> for most<\/td><\/tr>
Countries covered<\/td>93<\/td>65 countries and territories<\/td><\/tr>
30-day exemption tier<\/td>Non applicable<\/td>59 countries, including all 27 EU states and India<\/td><\/tr>
15-day exemption tier<\/td>Non applicable<\/td>2 countries (Mauritius, Seychelles)<\/td><\/tr>
Visa on arrival tier<\/td>Separate arrangements<\/td>3 countries (Azerbaijan, Belarus, Serbia)<\/td><\/tr>
Legal status<\/td>In force<\/strong><\/td>Awaiting Royal Gazette<\/strong>, then 15 days<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Reporting indicates that people already in Thailand under an existing entitlement will be allowed to complete the stay they were granted. That is the normal approach, but confirm it against the gazetted text when it appears rather than relying on it now.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why the country counts moved<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

If you followed this story in May, the numbers were different. The May Cabinet decision was reported as 54 countries at 30 days and three at 15 days. The July decision settled on 59, two, and three. Both reports were accurate when written. The framework was revised between the two meetings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is exactly why an approved measure is not a reliable planning basis. The detail moves until gazettal fixes it. Our page on the latest updates by Thai immigration<\/a> tracks these shifts as they land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Approved is not in force<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This distinction decides whether you can board a plane. A Cabinet resolution directs officials to act. It does not itself change the conditions of entry an immigration officer applies at the desk. Ministry of Interior announcements do that, and only once published in the Gazette royale<\/strong>. Here the announcements also carry a fifteen-day delay after publication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So there are two dates to watch, not one. The gazettal date, and the date fifteen days later when officers begin applying the new rule. Until the first happens, the 60-day exemption governs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where the DTV fits<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Destination Thailand Visa launched in July 2024, in the same wave of policy as the 60-day exemption. As the exemption narrows, the DTV becomes the obvious route for the people the change hits hardest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Its core terms are a five-year multiple-entry visa, up to 180 days per entry, extendable once inside Thailand by a further 180 days. The government fee is 10,000 baht per issuance. Applicants qualify under a workcation category, a Thai soft-power activity category, or as a dependent. The financial requirement is 500,000 baht.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our detailed page on Destination Thailand Visa requirements<\/a> covers the documents category by category.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How DTV practice has hardened since launch<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The published terms have not changed much. How embassies apply them has changed a great deal. These points reflect consistent practitioner experience rather than any published instrument, so treat them as practice rather than law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n