{"id":3914,"date":"2026-08-07T11:08:16","date_gmt":"2026-08-07T04:08:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/recovering-marital-assets-given-away-thailand-dika-139-2569\/"},"modified":"2026-08-07T23:13:50","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T16:13:50","slug":"recovering-marital-assets-given-away-thailand-dika-139-2569","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/recovering-marital-assets-given-away-thailand-dika-139-2569\/","title":{"rendered":"Can You Get Back Marital Assets Your Spouse Gave Away? Supreme Court Decision 139\/2569"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"tlo-lede wp-block-paragraph\">A husband moved THB 1,431,731 of marital money to another woman. His wife got every\nbaht of it back \u2014 and still lost, because of when she filed. Thailand&#8217;s Supreme Court explained why in\nDecision 139\/2569, and the lesson is about timing rather than entitlement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e14\u0e47\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e33\u0e04\u0e31\u0e0d<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n  <li>Gifts of marital property made without your consent can be revoked under <strong>CCC section\n  1480<\/strong>, and the property itself recovered from the recipient.<\/li>\n  <li>A gift recipient <strong>\u0e44\u0e21\u0e48\u0e2a\u0e32\u0e21\u0e32\u0e23\u0e16<\/strong> use the &#8220;good faith and for value&#8221; defence \u2014 a gift has\n  no consideration, so the defence fails on its own terms.<\/li>\n  <li>You have <strong>one year from discovery<\/strong>, and ten years from the transaction, to bring\n  the claim.<\/li>\n  <li>Interest runs only from the <strong>date of the revoking judgment<\/strong>, not from the date of\n  the transfer. Delay is expensive even when you win.<\/li>\n  <li>Settling a compensation claim against the third party does <strong>\u0e44\u0e21\u0e48<\/strong> bar a later\n  revocation claim. The two rest on different grounds.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What happened in Decision 139\/2569<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The case came before the Supreme Court&#8217;s Juvenile and Family Division as black case\n\u0e22\u0e0a.(\u0e1e) 12\/2568. During the marriage, the husband transferred THB 1,431,731 of marital funds\n(<em>\u0e0b\u0e34\u0e19 \u0e0b\u0e2d\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2d\u0e2a<\/em>) to a third party as a gratuitous gift. His wife did not consent and, on the\nfindings, did not know at the time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">She had already brought and settled a separate claim for compensation under CCC section 1523\nparagraph 2 arising from the same relationship. She then filed this second action to revoke the gifts\nthemselves and recover the money.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The case moved through three different answers:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table>\n  <thead>\n    <tr>\n      <th>\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25<\/th>\n      <th>Amount revoked<\/th>\n      <th>Interest running from<\/th>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/thead>\n  <tbody>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Court of First Instance<\/td>\n      <td>THB 267,000 (partial)<\/td>\n      <td>Day after the complaint was filed<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e2d\u0e38\u0e17\u0e18\u0e23\u0e13\u0e4c<\/td>\n      <td>THB 1,431,731 (full)<\/td>\n      <td>Dates of the transfers<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td><strong>\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e0e\u0e35\u0e01\u0e32<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td><strong>THB 1,431,731 (full)<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td><strong>16 February 2566 \u2014 the first-instance judgment date<\/strong><\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Interest was fixed at 5% per annum, adjustable by royal decree under CCC section 7 plus 2%, capped\nat 5%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why the gift was revocable<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>CCC section 1476<\/strong> sets out the eight dealings with marital property that spouses must\nmanage jointly or with the other&#8217;s consent. Subsection (5) covers gratuitous gifts:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>(\u0e55) \u0e43\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e42\u0e14\u0e22\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e19\u0e48\u0e2b\u0e32 \u0e40\u0e27\u0e49\u0e19\u0e41\u0e15\u0e48\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48\u0e1e\u0e2d\u0e04\u0e27\u0e23\u0e41\u0e01\u0e48\u0e10\u0e32\u0e19\u0e32\u0e19\u0e38\u0e23\u0e39\u0e1b\u0e02\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e04\u0e23\u0e2d\u0e1a\u0e04\u0e23\u0e31\u0e27\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e01\u0e38\u0e28\u0e25 \u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21\n\u0e2b\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e15\u0e32\u0e21\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e49\u0e32\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e08\u0e23\u0e23\u0e22\u0e32<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The exception is routinely misdescribed \u2014 including by other English-language sources \u2014 as four\nalternatives. It is not. A gift escapes the consent requirement only if it is <strong>both<\/strong> for\ncharitable purposes, for social purposes, or in accordance with moral obligation, <strong>\u0e41\u0e25\u0e30<\/strong>\nproportionate to the family&#8217;s station in life. Both limbs, not either.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That reading matters here. A contribution to a family wedding clears both. A temple donation of\nsensible size clears both. A transfer of THB 1.4 million to a romantic partner clears neither.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Since the Marriage Equality Act (CCC Amendment Act No. 24, B.E. 2567, in force 22 January 2025),\nsection 1476 refers to <em>\u0e04\u0e39\u0e48\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a<\/em> \u2014 spouses \u2014 and applies identically to same-sex marriages\nregistered in Thailand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Where section 1476 is breached, <strong>section 1480<\/strong> supplies the remedy:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e08\u0e31\u0e14\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e34\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e0b\u0e36\u0e48\u0e07\u0e15\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e08\u0e31\u0e14\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e23\u0e48\u0e27\u0e21\u0e01\u0e31\u0e19\u0e2b\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e15\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e23\u0e31\u0e1a\u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21\u0e22\u0e34\u0e19\u0e22\u0e2d\u0e21\u0e08\u0e32\u0e01\u0e2d\u0e35\u0e01\u0e1d\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e36\u0e48\u0e07\u0e15\u0e32\u0e21\u0e21\u0e32\u0e15\u0e23\u0e32 \u0e51\u0e54\u0e57\u0e56\n\u0e16\u0e49\u0e32\u0e04\u0e39\u0e48\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e1d\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e36\u0e48\u0e07\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e17\u0e33\u0e19\u0e34\u0e15\u0e34\u0e01\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e44\u0e1b\u0e41\u0e15\u0e48\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e35\u0e22\u0e07\u0e1d\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e40\u0e14\u0e35\u0e22\u0e27 \u0e2b\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e42\u0e14\u0e22\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e32\u0e28\u0e08\u0e32\u0e01\u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21\u0e22\u0e34\u0e19\u0e22\u0e2d\u0e21\u0e02\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e04\u0e39\u0e48\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e2d\u0e35\u0e01\u0e1d\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e36\u0e48\u0e07\n\u0e04\u0e39\u0e48\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e2d\u0e35\u0e01\u0e1d\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e36\u0e48\u0e07\u0e2d\u0e32\u0e08\u0e1f\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e01\u0e16\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e19\u0e34\u0e15\u0e34\u0e01\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e19\u0e31\u0e49\u0e19\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\n\u0e40\u0e27\u0e49\u0e19\u0e41\u0e15\u0e48\u0e04\u0e39\u0e48\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e23\u0e2a\u0e2d\u0e35\u0e01\u0e1d\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e36\u0e48\u0e07\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e15\u0e22\u0e32\u0e1a\u0e31\u0e19\u0e41\u0e01\u0e48\u0e19\u0e34\u0e15\u0e34\u0e01\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e19\u0e31\u0e49\u0e19\u0e41\u0e25\u0e49\u0e27\n\u0e2b\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e43\u0e19\u0e02\u0e13\u0e30\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48\u0e17\u0e33\u0e19\u0e34\u0e15\u0e34\u0e01\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e19\u0e31\u0e49\u0e19\u0e1a\u0e38\u0e04\u0e04\u0e25\u0e20\u0e32\u0e22\u0e19\u0e2d\u0e01\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e01\u0e23\u0e30\u0e17\u0e33\u0e42\u0e14\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e38\u0e08\u0e23\u0e34\u0e15\u0e41\u0e25\u0e30\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e35\u0e22\u0e04\u0e48\u0e32\u0e15\u0e2d\u0e1a\u0e41\u0e17\u0e19<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The final clause is the third party&#8217;s shield: it protects someone who acted <strong>in good faith\n<em>\u0e41\u0e25\u0e30<\/em> for value<\/strong>. Both limbs are required, and a gift cannot satisfy the second. This is\nwhy claims against a gift recipient are structurally stronger than claims against a buyer \u2014 the\nrecipient&#8217;s innocence is legally irrelevant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The interest holding \u2014 and why it is the practical story<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court of Appeal&#8217;s instinct was the intuitive one: the money left on a certain date, so interest\nshould run from that date. The Supreme Court disagreed, and the reasoning is worth following because it\ngoverns how these claims should be timed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A gratuitous transfer of marital property is <strong>not void<\/strong>. It is\n<strong>voidable<\/strong>. It remains fully effective until a court revokes it. Until that moment the\nrecipient holds the money lawfully, owes nothing, and therefore cannot be in default\n(<em>phit nat<\/em> \/ \u0e1c\u0e34\u0e14\u0e19\u0e31\u0e14). Since CCC section 224 default interest presupposes default, there is\nnothing for interest to attach to before judgment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The consequence is uncomfortable. Every month between the transfer and the judgment is a month in\nwhich the recipient has the use of your money for free. In this case the transfers and the\nfirst-instance judgment were separated by roughly two years \u2014 two years of interest on THB 1.4 million\nthat the wife was never going to recover, no matter how completely she won.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is the argument for filing immediately rather than waiting for the divorce proceedings to take\nshape.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Two claims, not one<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Where the transfer went to a romantic partner, Thai law offers two separate routes, and clients\nroutinely assume they must choose:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table>\n  <thead>\n    <tr>\n      <th><\/th>\n      <th>Revocation<\/th>\n      <th>\u0e04\u0e48\u0e32\u0e15\u0e2d\u0e1a\u0e41\u0e17\u0e19<\/th>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/thead>\n  <tbody>\n    <tr>\n      <td><strong>\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e08\u0e31\u0e14\u0e2b\u0e32<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>CCC s.1480 with s.1476<\/td>\n      <td>CCC s.1523 para 2<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td><strong>Recovers<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>The asset or money itself<\/td>\n      <td>Damages for the marital wrong<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td><strong>Limitation<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>1 year from discovery \/ 10 years from the act<\/td>\n      <td>Separate regime<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Decision 139\/2569 resolved the procedural question directly. The defendants argued that the settled\nsection 1523 claim made this action a repeat proceeding barred by CPC section 144. The Court rejected\nthat: the two claims <strong>\u0e2d\u0e32\u0e28\u0e31\u0e22\u0e02\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e2b\u0e32\u0e15\u0e48\u0e32\u0e07\u0e01\u0e31\u0e19<\/strong> \u2014 they rest on different grounds. Compensation\nconcerns the marital wrong; revocation concerns unauthorised management of marital property. Both are\navailable, and they can be run in sequence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court also disposed of a ratification argument. Section 1480 removes the right to revoke where\nthe innocent spouse has ratified the transaction. Here, the wife&#8217;s earlier conduct amounted to\n<strong>\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e1a\u0e2d\u0e01\u0e25\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07<\/strong> \u2014 avoiding the transaction, which brings it to an end \u2014 and not to\n<strong>\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e15\u0e22\u0e32\u0e1a\u0e31\u0e19<\/strong>, ratification. The distinction saved the claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The deadline most people miss<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The second paragraph of section 1480 is short and unforgiving:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e1f\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e28\u0e32\u0e25\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e01\u0e16\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e19\u0e34\u0e15\u0e34\u0e01\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e15\u0e32\u0e21\u0e27\u0e23\u0e23\u0e04\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e36\u0e48\u0e07\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e32\u0e21\u0e21\u0e34\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e1f\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e40\u0e21\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e1e\u0e49\u0e19\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e36\u0e48\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e35\n\u0e19\u0e31\u0e1a\u0e41\u0e15\u0e48\u0e27\u0e31\u0e19\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e23\u0e39\u0e49\u0e40\u0e2b\u0e15\u0e38\u0e2d\u0e31\u0e19\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e21\u0e39\u0e25\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e49\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e01\u0e16\u0e2d\u0e19 \u0e2b\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e40\u0e21\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e1e\u0e49\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e34\u0e1a\u0e1b\u0e35\u0e19\u0e31\u0e1a\u0e41\u0e15\u0e48\u0e27\u0e31\u0e19\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e17\u0e33\u0e19\u0e34\u0e15\u0e34\u0e01\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e19\u0e31\u0e49\u0e19<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One year from the day you learn of the grounds. Ten years from the transaction, absolutely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The one-year clock starts on <strong>discovery<\/strong> \u2014 not on separation, not on filing for\ndivorce, not on instructing a lawyer. In practice this is where these claims are lost. Someone finds a\nbank statement in March, spends the year deciding whether the marriage is over, and instructs a lawyer\nthe following April. The remedy has already expired.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Read alongside the interest holding, the two rules point the same way. Waiting can extinguish the\nclaim; waiting less can still cost you the interest. There is no version of this in which delay helps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What to do if you have just found a transfer<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n  <li><strong>Record the date and manner of discovery.<\/strong> This is the fact the limitation period\n  turns on and you may have to prove it.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Secure the evidence now.<\/strong> Bank statements, transfer records, Land Department\n  records, messages. Access tends to disappear once the dispute is open.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Avoid anything resembling ratification.<\/strong> Do not sign consent documents, accept a\n  share of proceeds, or give written acknowledgement of the transfer.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Ask about provisional measures<\/strong> if further dissipation looks likely.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>File the section 1480 claim promptly<\/strong> \u2014 before, or alongside, any compensation\n  claim, not after it settles.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Preventing the problem instead<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Section 1476\/1<\/strong> lets spouses vary the consent regime, in whole or in part, but only\nthrough a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/prenuptial-agreement-thailand\/\">prenuptial\nagreement<\/a> made under sections 1465 and 1466 \u2014 and in Thailand that must be registered at the\ndistrict office at the same time as the marriage. It cannot be added later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A properly drafted agreement can set a baht threshold above which any transfer requires written\nconsent, schedule pre-marital assets so that classification is never in dispute, and define what\n&#8220;proportionate to the family&#8217;s station in life&#8221; means for that couple. All three are cheaper than a\nrevocation action through three courts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">ThaiLawOnline \u0e2a\u0e32\u0e21\u0e32\u0e23\u0e16\u0e0a\u0e48\u0e27\u0e22\u0e40\u0e2b\u0e25\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e04\u0e38\u0e13\u0e44\u0e14\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e22\u0e48\u0e32\u0e07\u0e44\u0e23<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Our family law team has advised expatriates and mixed-nationality couples in Thailand for over 30\nyears, including on marital property disputes involving cross-border assets. If you have discovered a\ntransfer, the first question is not whether you have a claim \u2014 it is how much of the one-year period is\nleft.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"tlo-cta wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/family-law-consultation\/\">Book a family law\nconsultation<\/a> or read our full guide to\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/separation-of-assets-for-a-divorce-in-thailand\/\">separation of\nassets in a Thai divorce<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Related reading<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n  <li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/supreme-court-decisions\/\">Full case note: Supreme Court Decision 139\/2569<\/a><\/li>\n  <li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/supreme-court-decisions\/337-2530-interspousal-gift\/\">Decision 337\/2530 \u2014 Interspousal Gifts and Property Conversion<\/a><\/li>\n  <li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/divorce-in-thailand\/\">\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e2b\u0e22\u0e48\u0e32\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e43\u0e19\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22: \u0e02\u0e31\u0e49\u0e19\u0e15\u0e2d\u0e19 \u0e04\u0e48\u0e32\u0e43\u0e0a\u0e49\u0e08\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22 \u0e41\u0e25\u0e30\u0e40\u0e2d\u0e01\u0e2a\u0e32\u0e23\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48\u0e15\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e40\u0e15\u0e23\u0e35\u0e22\u0e21<\/a><\/li>\n  <li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/contested-divorce-in-thailand\/\">\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e2b\u0e22\u0e48\u0e32\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48\u0e21\u0e35\u0e02\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e1e\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e17\u0e43\u0e19\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22<\/a><\/li>\n  <li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/consequences-of-marriage-in-thailand\/\">\u0e1c\u0e25\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48\u0e15\u0e32\u0e21\u0e21\u0e32\u0e02\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e01\u0e32\u0e23\u0e41\u0e15\u0e48\u0e07\u0e07\u0e32\u0e19\u0e43\u0e19\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"tlo-disclaimer wp-block-paragraph\"><em>This article discusses Thai law as stated in Supreme Court Decision\n139\/2569 and the Civil and Commercial Code. It is general information, not legal advice on your\nsituation. Limitation periods are strict and fact-dependent \u2014 take advice on your own facts\npromptly.<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thai law lets you revoke gifts of marital property made without your consent \u2014 but you have one year from discovery. Supreme Court Decision 139\/2569 explained.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4224,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3914","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-family-law","pmpro-has-access"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3914","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3914"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3914\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4225,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3914\/revisions\/4225"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4224"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3914"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thailawonline.com\/th\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3914"}],"curies":[{"name":"\u0e14\u0e31\u0e1a\u0e40\u0e1a\u0e34\u0e25\u0e22\u0e39\u0e1e\u0e35","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}