Section 330 — Finality of sharing orders
Statutory text (Thai original)
คำสั่งของศาลตามมาตรา ๓๒๗ วรรคสามและวรรคสี่ และมาตรา ๓๒๙ ให้เป็นที่สุด
English translation
An order of the court under Section 327 paragraphs three and four and under Section 329 shall be final.
This English translation is provided for reference only and has not yet been firm-verified — always rely on the Thai original.
Firm annotation
Section 330 is a short finality clause in Part 7. It declares that court orders under Section 327 paragraphs three and four (on continuing an execution after withdrawal) and under Section 329 (on late sharing and substitution) are final. The purpose is to prevent execution proceedings from being stalled by appeals over who may share in or carry on the enforcement, keeping the distribution process moving. It should be read together with Sections 327 and 329, which set out the substantive rights it renders final.
Why this matters in practice
If the court rules on a request under Section 327 (para three or four) or Section 329, that decision is the end of the road: there is no appeal. Practically, a creditor should put its strongest case before the court the first time, because there is no second chance to challenge the outcome on those points.
Frequently asked questions
Can I appeal a court order about sharing in execution proceeds?
No. Section 330 makes orders under Section 327 paragraphs three and four and under Section 329 final, so those decisions cannot be appealed.
Which orders does Section 330 make final?
Orders under Section 327 paragraphs three and four (continuing an execution after withdrawal) and under Section 329 (late sharing and substitution) are final.