Criminal Procedure Code

Section 258: Civil Procedure Rules on Litigation Costs

Statutory text (Thai original)

ให้นำบทบัญญัติแห่งประมวลกฎหมายวิธีพิจารณาความแพ่งว่าด้วยค่าฤชาธรรมเนียมมาใช้บังคับโดยอนุโลม

English translation

The provisions of the Civil Procedure Code on litigation costs shall apply mutatis mutandis.

This English translation is provided for reference only and has not yet been firm-verified. Always rely on the Thai original.

Firm annotation

Section 258 closes the Chapter on fees with a gap-filling reference: the Civil Procedure Code provisions on litigation costs (ค่าฤชาธรรมเนียม) apply mutatis mutandis. Crucially, this imports the CPC's distinction between a fee (ค่าธรรมเนียม), which section 252 bars in criminal cases, and litigation costs including attorney's fees, which the court may still address. It thus works together with sections 253, 254, and 255 to complete the fee regime for the civil components of criminal proceedings.

Why this matters in practice

The practical upshot is the fee-versus-cost distinction: even though a criminal case charges no fee, the court can still deal with litigation costs such as attorney's fees under the Civil Procedure Code through this section. When arguing about who pays attorney's fees in the civil part of a criminal case, this is the provision that supplies the applicable rules.

Supreme Court decisions interpreting this section

  1. Supreme Court Judgment No. 7571/2560 (2017)

    Section 258 applies the Civil Procedure Code rules on litigation costs to criminal cases mutatis mutandis. Under CPC section 149 paragraph 1 an attorney's fee is a litigation cost and not a court fee, and CPC section 167 paragraph 1 requires the court to deal with litigation costs in its judgment. The bar in section 253 paragraph 1 on charging a fee, in a case where the public prosecutor is plaintiff and the victim has applied for compensation, therefore does not prevent the trial court from ordering the defendant to pay the victim's attorney's fee. The point concerns public order, so the Supreme Court may decide it of its own motion under section 195 paragraph 2 read with section 225.

    The victim applied in the criminal case for 100,000 baht in compensation for injury. The trial court awarded compensation and ordered the first defendant to pay her 4,000 baht in attorney's fees. The Court of Appeal Region 8 set that part aside, reasoning that section 253 paragraph 1 forbids charging a fee in a case where the public prosecutor is plaintiff and the victim has applied for compensation. The Supreme Court disagreed. Section 258 brings in the Civil Procedure Code rules on litigation costs, CPC section 149 paragraph 1 classes an attorney's fee as a litigation cost rather than a court fee, and CPC section 167 paragraph 1 requires the court to rule on litigation costs in its judgment. Since the victim had instructed counsel who conducted the civil part of the proceedings, the trial court had power to fix the attorney's fee. Being a question of public order the Supreme Court decided the point although no party had raised it on final appeal, and it restored the trial court's order.

Curated decisions with case numbers verified against the Supreme Court database. English renderings are the firm's editorial translation for study.

Cited in 2 Supreme Court decisions (1950 to 2017)

Selected citing decisions

  • Decision 7571/2560 (2017)
  • Decision 793/2493 (1950)

This list is selected automatically, weighted towards judgments that turn on this section rather than ones that merely recite it when passing sentence. It has not yet been reviewed by the firm.

Counted across the firm's corpus of 83,652 Supreme Court decisions, 1921 to 2026. The count is complete; the stated year range trims rare outliers so it describes where the citations actually sit. These figures are computed by us and are not official court statistics. How we count these, and what we measured

Frequently asked questions

Are attorney's fees available in a criminal case?

Yes, in the fee-bearing civil parts. Section 258 applies the Civil Procedure Code rules on litigation costs mutatis mutandis, and attorney's fees are litigation costs, not a barred fee.

What is the difference between a fee and litigation costs here?

A fee (ค่าธรรมเนียม) is barred in criminal cases by section 252, while litigation costs (ค่าฤชาธรรมเนียม), which include attorney's fees, are governed by the Civil Procedure Code through section 258.

Cite this section

  • Plain citation Criminal Procedure Code, s. 258 (Thailand)
  • Academic citation Criminal Procedure Code (Thailand), s. 258. ThaiLawOnline, https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-criminal-procedure-code/section-258/ (accessed 1 September 2026).
  • Thai citation ป.วิ.อ. มาตรา 258
  • Permalink https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-criminal-procedure-code/section-258/
  • Embed on your site <blockquote cite="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-criminal-procedure-code/section-258/"><p>The provisions of the Civil Procedure Code on litigation costs shall apply mutatis mutandis.</p><footer>Criminal Procedure Code, s. 258 (Thailand): <a href="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-criminal-procedure-code/section-258/">ThaiLawOnline</a></footer></blockquote>

The Thai text is authoritative. The English is an unofficial translation by ThaiLawOnline, free to reuse with attribution.

This is educational reference, not legal advice. Consult a qualified Thai lawyer before relying on any provision.

Scroll to Top
WhatsApp LINE Call Book