Section 50 — Victim treated as judgment creditor
Statutory text (Thai original)
ในกรณีที่ศาลสั่งให้คืนหรือใช้ราคาทรัพย์สิน
หรือค่าสินไหมทดแทนแก่ผู้เสียหายตามมาตรา ๔๓ มาตรา ๔๔ หรือมาตรา ๔๔/๑
ให้ถือว่าผู้เสียหายนั้นเป็นเจ้าหนี้ตามคำพิพากษา
English translation
In a case where the court orders the return or payment of the value of property, or of compensation, to the injured person under section 43, section 44 or section 44/1, the injured person shall be deemed a judgment creditor.
This English translation is provided for reference only and has not yet been firm-verified — always rely on the Thai original.
Firm annotation
Section 50 gives the victim's restitution or compensation award real teeth: once the court orders return of property, payment of its value, or compensation under sections 43, 44 or 44/1, the injured person is deemed a judgment creditor. That status lets the victim enforce the order through civil execution, like any judgment debt, without a fresh lawsuit. The provision is confined to those three sections, so an order of a different kind, for example a demolition order under a special statute, does not make the beneficiary a section 50 judgment creditor. It also identifies who qualifies: the actual injured person, not, for instance, an insurer whose claim arises from an insurance contract rather than the offence.
Why this matters in practice
The practical value here is enforcement: because the victim is a judgment creditor, you can move straight to civil execution, seizing or attaching assets, if the defendant does not pay, without starting a separate case. Be aware of the limits: the section covers only orders under sections 43, 44 and 44/1, and an insurer who paid out under a policy is not treated as the injured person for this purpose. If a defendant will not pay a restitution order, enforcing it is often the real battle, and a guide to going to court in Thailand plus tailored advice can help you plan execution.
Supreme Court decisions interpreting this section
-
Supreme Court Judgment No. 880/2555 (2012)
Section 50 makes only the actual injured person a judgment creditor; an insurer, whose claim arises from the insurance contract rather than the offence, is not in that position.
Quoting Section 50 in full, the Court held that an insurer's loss arose from its liability under the insurance contract, not from the theft, so its claim was not a tort claim like that of the true victims. The two vehicle owners, not the insurer, were the injured persons entitled to judgment-creditor status.
-
Supreme Court Judgment No. 3132/2556 (2013)
Section 50 deems the injured person a judgment creditor for return of the principal, but does not by itself entitle the victim to interest beyond what the underlying law allows.
In a public-fraud lending case, the provisions on civil actions connected with criminal cases applied mutatis mutandis, and Section 50 deemed the injured persons judgment creditors for the principal. The Court held, however, that the benefit the victims could claim had to be a lawful entitlement, and did not automatically extend to 15 percent annual interest merely by virtue of judgment-creditor status.
-
Supreme Court Judgment No. 14804/2556 (2013)
Sections 43, 44 and 50 apply to reclaiming property or its value for a victim; an order of a different kind, such as demolition under a special statute, is not such a restitution and can be enforced separately by the responsible agency.
Where the court ordered the defendant to demolish structures under the Royal Irrigation Act, the Court held this was not a case of the prosecutor claiming property or value for a victim under Sections 43, 44 and 50. The Irrigation Department, responsible for the area, therefore had power to seek appointment of an execution officer to enforce the judgment, in addition to the plaintiff's own remedies.
Curated decisions with case numbers verified against the Supreme Court database. English renderings are the firm's editorial translation for study.
Frequently asked questions
Can a victim enforce a restitution order like a civil judgment?
Yes. Under Section 50, a victim awarded return, value or compensation under Sections 43, 44 or 44/1 is deemed a judgment creditor and may enforce it through civil execution.
Is an insurer that paid a claim treated as the injured person under Section 50?
No. An insurer's right arises from the insurance contract, not from the offence, so it is not the injured person for Section 50 purposes.