Penal Code

Section 148: Extortion by an official (abuse of power)

Amended by Act No. 26 B.E. 2560, in force 21 March 2017

Statutory text (Thai original)

ผู้ใดเป็นเจ้าพนักงาน ใช้อำนาจในตำแหน่งโดยมิชอบ ข่มขืนใจหรือจูงใจเพื่อให้บุคคลใดมอบให้หรือหามาให้ซึ่งทรัพย์สินหรือประโยชน์อื่นใดแก่ตนเองหรือผู้อื่น ต้องระวางโทษจำคุกตั้งแต่ห้าปีถึงยี่สิบปี หรือจำคุกตลอดชีวิต และปรับตั้งแต่หนึ่งแสนบาทถึงสี่แสนบาท หรือประหารชีวิต หมายเหตุ: [อัตราโทษ แก้ไขเพิ่มเติมโดยมาตรา ๗ แห่งพระราชบัญญัติแก้ไขเพิ่มเติมประมวลกฎหมายอาญา (ฉบับที่ ๒๖) พ.ศ. ๒๕๖๐]

English translation

Whoever, being an official, wrongfully exercises the power of his office to coerce or induce any person to deliver or procure property or any other benefit for himself or for another, shall be punished with imprisonment from five to twenty years or imprisonment for life, and a fine from one hundred thousand to four hundred thousand baht, or death.

This English translation is provided for reference only and has not yet been firm-verified. Always rely on the Thai original.

Firm annotation

Section 148 is the official-extortion offence. Its elements are (1) being an official, (2) wrongfully exercising the power of the office, (3) to coerce or induce a person, (4) to deliver or procure property or any other benefit for the official or another. It differs from bribery under Section 149: Section 149 punishes demanding or accepting a benefit in exchange for an act of office, while Section 148 punishes the abuse of official power to compel a benefit, typically where the demand is backed by the threat of official action. The person coerced must be someone other than a co-offender; pressure applied to a fellow participant in the scheme does not satisfy the element of coercing another person. This is among the few Penal Code offences carrying a possible death penalty.

Why this matters in practice

This carries the heaviest exposure in the Chapter, up to death, and is non-compoundable and prosecuted by the State through the anti-corruption process. Two defences recur in the case law: first, that the offence was never charged, so a court cannot convict on Section 148 if the prosecution pleaded only bribery or Section 157; second, that the person who paid was a co-offender rather than a coerced outsider, which negates the coercion element. Because the difference between Section 148, Section 149 and the general offence in Section 157 often decides the sentence, precise charge analysis is essential.

Supreme Court decisions interpreting this section

  1. Supreme Court Judgment No. 4789/2565 (2022)

    Where officials make an unlawful arrest and then extract money, the conduct is not bribery under Section 149 but abuse of official power to coerce a benefit under Section 148; however, a court cannot convict under Section 148 when the prosecution did not charge that offence.

    Because the arrest was unlawful, the later demand for money could not be bribery under Section 149. The Supreme Court held the conduct fell under Section 148 as abuse of office to coerce a benefit, but since the prosecution had not charged Section 148, no conviction on that count was possible.

  2. Supreme Court Judgment No. 4594/2565 (2022)

    The person coerced or induced under Section 148 must be someone other than a co-offender; where the payer had joined in committing the offence with the defendant, there is no coercion of another person and the conduct lacks an element of Section 148.

    The Supreme Court held that because the person who provided the benefit was a participant in the offence, the defendant had not coerced or induced another person, so an element of Section 148 was missing. The defendant was instead dealt with under the general malfeasance provision.

Curated decisions with case numbers verified against the Supreme Court database. English renderings are the firm's editorial translation for study.

Cited in 96 Supreme Court decisions (1958 to 2022)

Selected citing decisions

  • Decision 4789/2565 (2022)
  • Decision 4594/2565 (2022)
  • Decision 3299/2564 (2021)
  • Decision 9955/2558 (2015)
  • Decision 10616/2553 (2010)
  • Decision 2389/2547 (2004)
  • Decision 3470/2543 (2000)
  • Decision 1170/2542 (1999)

This list is selected automatically, weighted towards judgments that turn on this section rather than ones that merely recite it when passing sentence. It has not yet been reviewed by the firm.

Most often cited alongside

Sections that appear in the same judgments as this one most often. The figure is the number of decisions.

Counted across the firm's corpus of 83,652 Supreme Court decisions, 1921 to 2026. The count is complete; the stated year range trims rare outliers so it describes where the citations actually sit. These figures are computed by us and are not official court statistics. How we count these, and what we measured

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Section 148 and bribery under Section 149?

Section 148 punishes an official who abuses his power to coerce a benefit; Section 149 punishes an official who demands or accepts a benefit in exchange for an act of office.

Can an official be convicted under Section 148 if only bribery was charged?

No. If the prosecution did not plead Section 148, the court cannot convict on it even where the facts fit, because a court cannot punish for an uncharged offence.

Does Section 148 apply if the payer was part of the scheme?

No. The person coerced must be someone other than a co-offender; pressure on a fellow participant does not meet the coercion element.

Related guides on ThaiLawOnline

Cite this section

  • Plain citation Penal Code, s. 148 (Thailand)
  • Academic citation Penal Code (Thailand), s. 148. ThaiLawOnline, https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-148/ (accessed 21 August 2026).
  • Thai citation ป.อ. มาตรา 148
  • Permalink https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-148/
  • Embed on your site <blockquote cite="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-148/"><p>Whoever, being an official, wrongfully exercises the power of his office to coerce or induce any person to deliver or procure property or any other benefit for himself or for another, shall be punished with imprisonment from five to twenty years or imprisonment for life,…</p><footer>Penal Code, s. 148 (Thailand) — <a href="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-148/">ThaiLawOnline</a></footer></blockquote>

The Thai text is authoritative. The English is an unofficial translation by ThaiLawOnline, free to reuse with attribution.

This is educational reference, not legal advice. Consult a qualified Thai lawyer before relying on any provision.

Scroll to Top
WhatsApp LINE Call Book