Section 269/1: Forging an electronic card
Statutory text (Thai original)
ผู้ใดทำบัตรอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ปลอมขึ้นทั้งฉบับหรือแต่ส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใด เติมหรือตัดทอนข้อความ หรือแก้ไขด้วยประการใด ๆ ในบัตรอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ที่แท้จริง โดยประการที่น่าจะเกิดความเสียหายแก่ผู้อื่นหรือประชาชน ถ้าได้กระทำเพื่อให้ผู้หนึ่งผู้ใดหลงเชื่อว่าเป็นบัตรอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ที่แท้จริงหรือเพื่อใช้ประโยชน์อย่างหนึ่งอย่างใด ผู้นั้นกระทำความผิดฐานปลอมบัตรอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ ต้องระวางโทษจำคุกตั้งแต่หนึ่งปีถึงห้าปี และปรับตั้งแต่สองหมื่นบาทถึงหนึ่งแสนบาท
English translation
Whoever makes a false electronic card in whole or in part, adds to or removes text, or alters by any means a genuine electronic card, in a manner likely to cause damage to another person or to the public, if the act is done in order to make any person believe that it is a genuine electronic card or in order to obtain any benefit, commits the offence of forging an electronic card and shall be liable to imprisonment from one year to five years and a fine from twenty thousand baht to one hundred thousand baht.
ThaiLawOnline translation, written from the Thai original and verified
Firm annotation
Section 269/1 is the base offence of the Chapter on Offences Relating to Electronic Cards and the card analogue of document forgery under Section 264. The term electronic card is not defined in this Section but in Section 1(14) of the General Part, and the definition is deliberately wide: it covers a physical card and the data recorded on it, intangible data, codes, account numbers, and electronic serial numbers issued without any card, and anything else used with electronic data to identify the holder. The elements are: (1) making a false electronic card wholly or partly, or adding to, removing from, or altering a genuine card; (2) a manner likely to cause damage to another person or to the public; and (3) intent either to make a person believe the card is genuine or to obtain any benefit. That second intent limb is wider than Section 264, which requires only intent to deceive as to genuineness. The penalty is cumulative, imprisonment and a fine. Sections 269/2 to 269/4 reach the forging tools, cross-border movement, and use or sale of cards forged under this Section, and Section 269/7 increases every penalty in the Chapter by one half where the card is a payment or cash withdrawal card.
Why this matters in practice
The one year minimum term and the mandatory fine make this materially heavier than ordinary document forgery under Section 264, and a fine only outcome is not available. Card cloning prosecutions are almost always multi count: the forging under this Section, the skimming or encoding equipment under Section 269/2, the use or sale under Section 269/4, and theft under Section 334 for the money taken. Because a credit, debit, or ATM card is the usual subject matter, Section 269/7 will normally apply and increase the penalty by one half, so real exposure on a single forged payment card is imprisonment from one year and six months to seven years and six months. Where several cards are made with the intent that each be used separately, courts have treated each card as a separate count.
Supreme Court decisions interpreting this section
-
Supreme Court Judgment No. 1517/2564 (2021)
A card used to pay for goods, services, or debts in lieu of cash, or to withdraw cash from a bank account, is evidence of the creation, change, transfer, reservation, or extinction of a right, and so qualifies as a document and a right document under Section 1(7) and (9) of the Penal Code.
In a prosecution spanning document forgery and electronic card offences under Sections 264, 265, 266, 269/1, 269/2, 269/4, 269/7, and 334, the court characterised the payment card as both a document and a right document, and the defendant was convicted on multiple counts.
Curated decisions with case numbers verified against the Supreme Court database. English renderings are the firm's editorial translation for study.
Cited in 5 Supreme Court decisions (2009 to 2021)
Selected citing decisions
- Decision 2490/2558 (2015)
- Decision 16000/2553 (2010)
- Decision 1517/2564 (2021)
- Decision 11227/2555 (2012)
- Decision 3499/2552 (2009)
This list is selected automatically, weighted towards judgments that turn on this section rather than ones that merely recite it when passing sentence. It has not yet been reviewed by the firm.
Most often cited alongside
- Section 91 5
- Section 269/4 5
- Section 269/7 5
- Section 33 4
- Section 78 4
- Section 32 3
Sections that appear in the same judgments as this one most often. The figure is the number of decisions.
Counted across the firm's corpus of 83,652 Supreme Court decisions, 1921 to 2026. The count is complete; the stated year range trims rare outliers so it describes where the citations actually sit. These figures are computed by us and are not official court statistics. How we count these, and what we measured
Frequently asked questions
Does electronic card cover more than a physical card?
Yes. Section 269/1 covers both physical cards such as credit and ATM cards and intangible data, codes, or account numbers usable in an electronic system to obtain money, goods, or services.
Is a credit card also a legal document?
Courts have held that a credit or ATM card used to pay for goods and services or to withdraw cash is also a document and a right document under Section 1 of the Penal Code, so card offences often overlap with document forgery charges.
Related guides on ThaiLawOnline
Cite this section
-
Plain citation
Penal Code, s. 269/1 (Thailand) -
Academic citation
Penal Code (Thailand), s. 269/1. ThaiLawOnline, https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-269-1/ (accessed 17 August 2026). -
Thai citation
ป.อ. มาตรา 269/1 -
Permalink
https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-269-1/ -
Embed on your site
<blockquote cite="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-269-1/"><p>Whoever makes a false electronic card in whole or in part, adds to or removes text, or alters by any means a genuine electronic card, in a manner likely to cause damage to another person or to the public, if the act is done in…</p><footer>Penal Code, s. 269/1 (Thailand) — <a href="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-269-1/">ThaiLawOnline</a></footer></blockquote>
The Thai text is authoritative. The English is an unofficial translation by ThaiLawOnline, free to reuse with attribution.