Section 184: Destroying evidence to help an offender
Statutory text (Thai original)
ผู้ใดเพื่อจะช่วยผู้อื่นมิให้ต้องรับโทษ หรือให้รับโทษน้อยลง ทำให้เสียหาย ทำลาย ซ่อนเร้น เอาไปเสีย หรือทำให้สูญหายหรือไร้ประโยชน์ ซึ่งพยานหลักฐานในการกระทำความผิด ต้องระวางโทษจำคุกไม่เกินห้าปี หรือปรับไม่เกินหนึ่งแสนบาท หรือทั้งจำทั้งปรับ หมายเหตุ: [อัตราโทษ แก้ไขเพิ่มเติมโดยมาตรา ๔ แห่งพระราชบัญญัติแก้ไขเพิ่มเติมประมวลกฎหมายอาญา (ฉบับที่ ๒๖) พ.ศ. ๒๕๖๐]
English translation
Whoever, in order to help another person to escape punishment or to receive a lighter punishment, damages, destroys, conceals, takes away, or renders lost or useless any evidence of the commission of an offence, shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding five years or a fine not exceeding one hundred thousand Baht, or both.
This English translation is provided for reference only and has not yet been firm-verified. Always rely on the Thai original.
Firm annotation
Section 184 criminalizes tampering with evidence of another person's offence. Its elements are an act of damaging, destroying, concealing, taking away, or rendering lost or useless evidence of the commission of an offence, coupled with the specific purpose of helping the offender escape punishment or receive a lighter one. That purpose is an essential element: a charge that fails to allege it is defective. The section protects the integrity of criminal investigation and prosecution by targeting those who suppress proof of a crime, whether or not they committed the underlying offence. It works alongside the false-evidence offences and is distinct from concealing property ordered forfeited (Section 186) or seized or attached property (Section 187).
Why this matters in practice
This section reaches anyone who hides or destroys proof of someone else's crime, for example moving or concealing an object used in an offence to keep it from the police, and the penalty runs up to 5 years. The decisive element is purpose: the act must be done to help the offender escape or reduce punishment, and a complaint that does not spell out that purpose can be dismissed as defective. Because liability turns on that specific intent, both complainants and those accused should focus on what the conduct was actually meant to achieve. If you are involved in a case where evidence may have been tampered with, take advice on the intent and pleading requirements; you can consult a Thai criminal lawyer.
Supreme Court decisions interpreting this section
-
Supreme Court Judgment No. 4195/2558 (2015)
A charge under Section 184 must allege that the accused acted in order to help another person escape punishment or receive a lighter one; omitting this element makes the charge incomplete and defective.
The Court held the indictment defective because it did not allege that the defendants acted to help another person escape or reduce punishment, an essential element of Section 184; without it the charge did not comply with the pleading requirement.
-
Supreme Court Judgment No. 5811/2550 (2007)
Concealing an object that is evidence of another person's crime, such as a vehicle used in a killing, to prevent police from seizing it, is an offence under Section 184.
The defendant hid a motorcycle used by others as the vehicle in a premeditated killing, to keep police from seizing it as evidence. The trial court convicted under Section 184 with one year's imprisonment, later reduced on appeal.
Curated decisions with case numbers verified against the Supreme Court database. English renderings are the firm's editorial translation for study.
Cited in 18 Supreme Court decisions (1963 to 2015)
Selected citing decisions
- Decision 5811/2550 (2007)
- Decision 3964/2532 (1989)
- Decision 786/2522 (1979)
- Decision 168/2507 (1964)
- Decision 4195/2558 (2015)
- Decision 20377/2555 (2012)
- Decision 760/2511 (1968)
- Decision 665/2517 (1974)
This list is selected automatically, weighted towards judgments that turn on this section rather than ones that merely recite it when passing sentence. It has not yet been reviewed by the firm.
Most often cited alongside
- Section 83 16
- Section 91 9
- Section 157 7
- Section 78 5
- Section 200 5
- Thai CrPC s. 225 4
Sections that appear in the same judgments as this one most often. The figure is the number of decisions.
Counted across the firm's corpus of 83,652 Supreme Court decisions, 1921 to 2026. The count is complete; the stated year range trims rare outliers so it describes where the citations actually sit. These figures are computed by us and are not official court statistics. How we count these, and what we measured
Frequently asked questions
What must a Section 184 charge allege?
It must allege both the tampering with evidence and the purpose of helping another person escape punishment or receive a lighter one. Omitting that purpose makes the charge defective.
Does hiding an object used in a crime count?
Yes. Courts have convicted under Section 184 where a person concealed an object that was evidence of another's crime, such as a vehicle used in the offence, to keep it from the police.
Related guides on ThaiLawOnline
Cite this section
-
Plain citation
Penal Code, s. 184 (Thailand) -
Academic citation
Penal Code (Thailand), s. 184. ThaiLawOnline, https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-184/ (accessed 17 August 2026). -
Thai citation
ป.อ. มาตรา 184 -
Permalink
https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-184/ -
Embed on your site
<blockquote cite="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-184/"><p>Whoever, in order to help another person to escape punishment or to receive a lighter punishment, damages, destroys, conceals, takes away, or renders lost or useless any evidence of the commission of an offence, shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding five years or a…</p><footer>Penal Code, s. 184 (Thailand) — <a href="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-184/">ThaiLawOnline</a></footer></blockquote>
The Thai text is authoritative. The English is an unofficial translation by ThaiLawOnline, free to reuse with attribution.