สามารถยกเลิกสิทธิการใช้ประโยชน์ในประเทศไทยได้หรือไม่? คู่มือฉบับสมบูรณ์

อัปเดตล่าสุดเมื่อวันที่ 11 เมษายน 2569

Usufruct (สิทธิใช้ประโยชน์) is a valuable property right in Thailand, but it must eventually end. Whether through death, mutual agreement, or court intervention, understanding the seven termination methods is essential. This guide explores each method, Supreme Court decisions, the Article 1469 debate, and practical strategies to protect your interests.

เขียนโดย เซบาสเตียน เอช. บรูสโซ และ วิชุดา อัตถเมธาคอน / ThaiLawOnline.com . Practicing usufruct law since 2006

The 7 Ways Usufruct Ends

Usufruct does not exist indefinitely. The Civil and Commercial Code recognizes multiple termination pathways. Some are automatic while others require court involvement. The table below summarizes the seven primary methods:

Termination Method	พื้นฐานทางกฎหมาย	Automatic?	Court Order Needed?
Death of usufructuary	Section 1418	ใช่	เลขที่
Expiry of fixed term	Section 1418	ใช่	เลขที่
Mutual agreement	General contract law	Yes (if both agree)	เลขที่
Merger (usufructuary becomes owner)	General principles	ใช่	เลขที่
Property destruction	Section 1419	ใช่	เลขที่
Court order for misuse	Section 1423	เลขที่	ใช่
Non-exercise. lapse	Section 1382 (prescription)	Debated	ใช่

Each method operates under distinct legal principles. Some occur automatically while others require formal action or judicial intervention. Understanding which applies to your situation is critical to avoiding costly disputes.

Death of the Usufructuary. The Automatic Rule

Section 1418. Non-Negotiable

The death of the usufructuary (ผู้ใช้ประโยชน์) is the most straightforward termination. Under Section 1418 of the Civil and Commercial Code, usufruct automatically ceases upon death. This rule is absolute. No court order is required, no notice to the Land Office is mandatory, and no conditions apply.

When a usufructuary dies, ownership of the property reverts entirely to the landowner. The usufructuary’s heirs have no claim to continue the usufruct. They cannot inherit this right. This is fundamentally different from ownership, which does pass to heirs. Usufruct is personal to the individual granted the right and cannot be transferred by will or intestate succession.

From a practical standpoint, termination is automatic. However, it is advisable to notify the Land Office (สำนักงานที่ดิน) and request cancellation of the usufruct registration. This prevents future disputes and facilitates any subsequent transfers or mortgaging by the landowner.

What Happens to Existing Leases. Lease Survives Death

A critical nuance arises if the deceased usufructuary had leased the property before death. Does the usufruct’s termination also terminate the tenancies?

Supreme Court Decision ฎีกา 2297/2541 (1998) clarifies this. Existing leases granted by the usufructuary survive the usufructuary’s death. The tenant’s rights continue even after the usufruct itself terminates. This is because a lease creates a separate, independent property right distinct from the usufruct.

The practical consequence is that the landowner, upon the usufructuary’s death, must honor any existing leases until their natural expiration. The landowner cannot cancel these leases because the usufructuary has died. This protects tenants from sudden displacement and ensures legal certainty in the rental market.

Can the Landowner Unilaterally Cancel Usufruct?

Short Answer. No

One of the most critical points in Thai usufruct law: a landowner cannot unilaterally cancel a registered usufruct without the usufructuary’s consent. This is a principle of property rights law. Once a usufruct is registered at the Land Office, the landowner’s ownership interest is subordinate to the usufructuary’s right to use and enjoy the property.

However, this rule has important exceptions. They depend on how the usufruct was created. The most significant exception involves usufruct created as part of a gift with encumbrance.

The Gift with Encumbrance Protection

When a landowner gifts property but retains usufruct as an encumbrance (ของขวัญที่มีค่าตอบแทน), a special legal regime applies. This occurs frequently in family property divisions. Aging parents gift land to children while retaining the right to use and enjoy the property for life.

Case Study 1. Decision 1516/2525 (1982)

ข้อเท็จจริง: A parent gifted land to a child but retained usufruct. The child received an annual payment of 30 bags of rice as consideration. The child later sought to revoke the gift on grounds of ingratitude.

Court’s Holding: The Court ruled that because the gift included an encumbrance, it was a gift with consideration. Under Section 535(2) of the Civil and Commercial Code, such gifts cannot be revoked even for ingratitude. The usufruct protection remained absolute.

Case Study 2. Decision 2651/2543 (2000)

ข้อเท็จจริง: A plaintiff gifted land to a defendant and registered usufruct in the plaintiff’s name. The defendant later became estranged. The plaintiff claimed grounds for revocation based on ingratitude.

Court’s Holding: The Supreme Court affirmed that a gift with an encumbered usufruct cannot be revoked. This applies regardless of subsequent ingratitude or family discord. The registration of usufruct was determinative.

Case Study 3. Decision 10344/2551 (2008)

ข้อเท็จจริง: Parents verbally agreed to divide land among their children while retaining usufruct rights. No formal written agreement existed. After family tensions arose, the parents sought to cancel the usufruct arrangement.

Court’s Holding: The Court recognized the arrangement as a gift with encumbrance. This barred revocation under Section 535(2). The oral agreement was sufficient to establish the protected status. Written formality was not determinative.

Legal Principle: These three landmark decisions establish a consistent doctrine. Once usufruct is registered as part of a gift with encumbrance, the landowner loses the ability to revoke or cancel it unilaterally. This protection applies even if the relationship deteriorates.

Section 1423. Court Intervention for Misuse

While a landowner cannot revoke usufruct, the owner retains limited protections. Section 1423 provides that if a usufructuary materially misuses the property in violation of the usufruct agreement or applicable law, the landowner may petition a court.

Available remedies under Section 1423 include:

• Demand for security: The court may require the usufructuary to post a bond to ensure proper maintenance and use of the property.
• Appointment of a custodian: In severe cases, the court may appoint a third-party custodian to manage the property and ensure compliance with usufruct terms.
• Judicial termination: In egregious cases involving willful destruction or complete abandonment, a court may order termination. This remedy is rare and requires clear evidence of breach.

The burden of proof is on the landowner to demonstrate that the usufructuary’s conduct is sufficiently serious to warrant judicial intervention. Mere disputes over property maintenance or minor violations are insufficient. The misuse must be material and demonstrable.

Can a Spouse Cancel Usufruct. Article 1469 Debate

The Legal Question. Article 1469 and Spousal Rights

One of the most contested areas of Thai usufruct law concerns whether a spouse can cancel or void a usufruct registered by their partner without spousal consent. This question arises under Article 1469 of the Civil and Commercial Code. It grants spouses broad powers to challenge property transactions executed without mutual consent.

Article 1469 states that a spouse may seek cancellation of property dispositions made without the other spouse’s consent. This includes sales, gifts, and mortgages. The article was designed to protect marital assets and prevent one spouse from secretly transferring valuable property rights without the other’s knowledge.

The question is whether registering a usufruct constitutes a “disposition” subject to Article 1469 scrutiny. If so, a spouse could theoretically challenge a usufruct registered during marriage without their explicit consent.

The Critical Fact. NO Thai Court Has EVER Cancelled a Registered Usufruct Under Article 1469

Despite decades of usufruct litigation in Thailand, no Thai court has ever cancelled a registered usufruct based on Article 1469. This absence is significant. While Thai courts have addressed Article 1469 in other contexts, they have consistently declined to extend the provision to registered usufruct rights.

The courts’ reasoning appears to rest on the following logic:

• Registration as constructive notice: Usufruct is registered and publicly visible at the Land Office. A spouse has constructive notice of all registered encumbrances on property held by the other spouse.
• Distinction between registration and disposition: Registering a usufruct that was previously agreed upon is not itself a “disposition” requiring spousal consent. Rather, it is an administrative action implementing an earlier agreement.
• Formality of registration: The formality and public nature of Land Office registration suggests legislative intent to protect registered rights from post hoc spousal challenges.

However, this legal principle is not entirely settled. A determined spouse could technically file suit under Article 1469. Success would be highly uncertain.

How to Protect Against This Risk

To minimize the risk of spousal challenge, consider the following protective measures:

• Register before marriage: If possible, register the usufruct before entering into marriage. A spouse’s Article 1469 rights typically do not extend to property transactions completed before the marriage began.
• Obtain written spousal consent: At the time of registration, secure a written acknowledgment from your spouse consenting to the usufruct registration. Present this document to the Land Office. It creates strong evidence that the spouse was not surprised.
• Prenuptial or postnuptial agreement: Execute a formal prenuptial agreement before marriage or a postnuptial agreement after marriage. Explicitly authorize the registration of usufruct and waive any right to challenge it under Article 1469.
• Land Office notification: Provide the Land Office with documentary evidence of spousal consent at the time of registration. Many Land Offices will make a notation indicating that the spouse was aware and consented.

Non-Exercise and Lapse

How Long Before It Lapses?

A common concern among property owners is whether a usufruct can lapse or expire due to non-use. If a usufructuary fails to exercise the right for many years, can the property owner reclaim unobstructed ownership?

Thai law provides an answer. Usufruct does not automatically expire merely because it is unused. However, a lengthy failure to exercise the right may trigger prescription or abandonment doctrines under limited circumstances. A property owner might seek court intervention.

Decision 1548/2503 (1960). Non-Exercise Over 7 to 8 Years

ข้อเท็จจริง: A usufructuary had registered a usufruct but had never exercised the right for 7 to 8 years. The property owner sought to reclaim full ownership.

Court’s Holding: The Supreme Court held that the usufructuary could STILL enforce the usufruct right despite prolonged non-exercise. The Court noted that the applicable limitation period was 10 years under Section 164. NOT the 1-year period specified in Section 1428.

Significance: This decision firmly established that mere non-use does not extinguish a registered usufruct. The usufructuary retains the right indefinitely unless a court explicitly orders termination or the usufruct is cancelled by mutual agreement.

The implication is clear. Registering a usufruct at the Land Office creates a durable property right that survives years of non-use. A property owner cannot assume that an unused usufruct has disappeared or can be ignored.

Practical Termination Strategies

For parties seeking to actually end a usufruct relationship, several practical pathways exist. The most effective strategies are outlined below.

Mutual Agreement (Safest Method)

The simplest and safest way to terminate usufruct is through mutual agreement of the property owner and usufructuary. When both parties agree to end the relationship, no court order is required. The process is straightforward.

Procedure:

1. Prepare a termination agreement: Draft a simple written agreement signed by both parties. It should state that the usufruct is terminated by mutual consent effective immediately.
2. Attend the Land Office together: Both the property owner and usufructuary should visit the Land Office (สำนักงานที่ดิน) in person with:
   • Original Land Certificate (โฉนดที่ดิน)
   • Original Usufruct Certificate (ใบรับรองสิทธิใช้ประโยชน์)
   • Termination agreement signed by both parties
   • Personal identification documents
3. Complete cancellation registration: The Land Office will process the cancellation and issue updated certificates showing that the usufruct has been terminated.
4. ค่าใช้จ่าย: Cancellation typically costs 100 to 500 baht, depending on the specific Land Office and any additional documentation required.

Mutual agreement is preferred because it avoids litigation. It preserves the relationship between the parties. It ensures a clean title for the property owner.

Fixed-Term Expiry. Automatic, No Action Needed

If the usufruct was created with a fixed term (e.g., “usufruct for 10 years from the date of registration”), the right automatically expires when the term elapses. No court action or formal notice is required.

Best practice: Even though termination is automatic, notify the Land Office and request cancellation of the registration. This clears the property title and avoids confusion in future transactions.

Court Order Under Section 1423. For Misuse Cases

If the usufructuary has materially violated the terms of the usufruct or misused the property, the property owner may petition a court under Section 1423. The property owner must prove:

• Specific acts of misuse or breach of usufruct terms
• Material harm or risk of harm to the property
• That lesser remedies such as a security deposit or custodian are insufficient

Court orders terminating usufruct for misuse are rare but possible. The court has discretion to fashion appropriate relief, including termination, appointment of a custodian, or required security deposits.

Property Destruction. Usufruct Ends if Property Destroyed

ภายใต้ Section 1419, if the property subject to usufruct is destroyed and cannot be restored to use, the usufruct automatically terminates. For example, if a building burns down and is a total loss, the usufruct over the building ceases.

However, if the property can be restored, the usufruct does not terminate. It continues and applies to the restored property.

คำถามที่พบบ่อย

คู่มือที่เกี่ยวข้อง

• สัญญาสิทธิการใช้ประโยชน์ในประเทศไทย . Comprehensive overview of usufruct creation, terms, and enforcement mechanisms.
• วิธีการจดทะเบียนสิทธิการใช้ประโยชน์ในประเทศไทย . Step-by-step guide to registration, from initial agreement through termination.
• Usufruct and Married Couples in Thailand . Analysis of spousal rights, Article 1469, and protections for usufruct in family contexts.
• Usufruct Upon Death and Inheritance in Thailand . Guide to what happens when a usufructuary dies and how heirs are affected.
• 64 Supreme Court Decisions on Usufruct . Full database of all landmark Thai Supreme Court cases involving usufruct.

ต้องการความช่วยเหลือเกี่ยวกับสิทธิการใช้ประโยชน์ของคุณหรือไม่?

ThaiLawOnline ได้จดทะเบียนสัญญาสิทธิการใช้ประโยชน์ที่ดินหลายร้อยฉบับตั้งแต่ปี 2549 เรามีความรู้ความเข้าใจในกฎหมาย กระบวนการของกรมที่ดิน และคำตัดสินของศาลฎีกาที่คุ้มครองสิทธิของคุณ

โทรหาเราวันนี้: +66 (0) 87 225 1340 หรืออีเมล info.thailaw@gmail.com

จองคิวปรึกษา