126 — การชี้ขาดข้อโต้แย้งความแท้จริงของเอกสาร

คำแปลภาษาไทย

Subject to the provisions of the following sections, if a party against whom the other party cites a document as evidence denies the authenticity of that document or the correctness of the copy, and the citing party still affirms its authenticity or the correctness of the copy, the court may, if it thinks fit, decide the dispute at once where it considers that no further taking of evidence is necessary; otherwise it shall decide after taking evidence by all or any of the following methods, namely:
(1) examining the documents that have not been objected to and recording the existence or contents of the document objected to;
(2) questioning witnesses who know of the existence or contents of the document objected to, or witnesses who are able to testify to the true contents of the document or the correctness of the copy;
(3) having an expert examine the document objected to.
While the case has not yet been decided, the court shall impound a document suspected of being forged or incorrect, but this does not apply to an official document that the authorities have recalled.

⚠︎ คำแปลนี้ยังไม่เป็นที่ทราบจากสำนักงาน — กรุณาอ้างอิงตัวบทภาษาไทยเป็นหลัก