มาตรา 32 — ละเมิดอำนาจศาลโดยหนังสือพิมพ์หรือสิ่งพิมพ์

คำแปลภาษาไทย

Whoever is the author, editor, or publisher of a newspaper or printed matter published to the public, whether or not those persons knew of the content or of the publication of such newspaper or printed matter, shall be deemed to have committed contempt of court in either one of the two following cases:
(1) at any time, if such newspaper or printed matter has stated or shown, by whatever means, any content or opinion disclosing the facts or other circumstances of a case, or any proceedings of a case, the publication of which the court has, for the sake of propriety or for the protection of the public interest, ordered to be prohibited, whether merely by ordering that the trial be conducted without disclosure or by expressly prohibiting publication;
(2) if the newspaper or printed matter has stated or shown, by whatever means, during the trial of a case up to the time judgment becomes final, any content or opinion intended to influence the feelings of the public, or the court, or a party, or a witness in the case, in such a way that it may be seen as likely to cause the trial to lose its justice, such as:
(a) misrepresenting the facts of the case; or
(b) being a report, summary, or commentary on the proceedings of the case in a manner that is not impartial and not accurate; or
(c) being an unfair commentary on the conduct of a party's case, or on the testimony or evidence, or on the character and behaviour of a party or witness, including making statements damaging to the reputation of a party or witness, even though those statements are true; or
(d) inducing the giving of false testimony.
For the purposes of this Section, all the definitions of terms in Section 4 of the Printing Act, B.E. 2476, shall apply.

⚠︎ คำแปลนี้ยังไม่เป็นที่ทราบจากสำนักงาน — กรุณาอ้างอิงตัวบทภาษาไทยเป็นหลัก