Section 267: Causing a false statement to be recorded in an official document
Statutory text (Thai original)
ผู้ใดแจ้งให้เจ้าพนักงานผู้กระทำการตามหน้าที่จดข้อความอันเป็นเท็จลงในเอกสารมหาชนหรือเอกสารราชการ ซึ่งมีวัตถุประสงค์สำหรับใช้เป็นพยานหลักฐาน โดยประการที่น่าจะเกิดความเสียหายแก่ผู้อื่นหรือประชาชน ต้องระวางโทษจำคุกไม่เกินสามปี หรือปรับไม่เกินหกหมื่นบาท หรือทั้งจำทั้งปรับ หมายเหตุ: [อัตราโทษ แก้ไขเพิ่มเติมโดยมาตรา ๔ แห่งพระราชบัญญัติแก้ไขเพิ่มเติมประมวลกฎหมายอาญา (ฉบับที่ ๒๖) พ.ศ. ๒๕๖๐]
English translation
Whoever gives information to an official acting in the course of duty, causing the official to record a false statement in a public document or an official document intended to serve as evidence, in a manner likely to cause damage to another person or to the public, shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding three years, or a fine not exceeding sixty thousand baht, or both.
ThaiLawOnline translation, written from the Thai original and verified
Firm annotation
Section 267 is a form of indirect forgery: rather than falsifying a document himself, the offender causes a genuine document to contain a false statement by lying to the recording official. Its elements are: (1) informing an official acting in the course of duty; (2) causing a false statement to be recorded in a public or official document intended as evidence; and (3) a manner likely to cause damage to another or the public. It differs from the direct forgery of Sections 264 to 266 because the document itself is authentic; the falsity lies in its content. It is frequently charged with Section 137 (giving false information to an official) and, where the false record is later used, with Section 268.
Why this matters in practice
This offence commonly arises in land registry transactions, company registrations, and civil status records, where a party induces the officer to enter false particulars. Penalty exposure is up to three years, but suspended sentences with a fine are common for first offenders, as illustrated by dika practice. Where the false record is then used, prosecutors add Section 268; a single act violating both is punished under the heavier applicable provision. A frequent defence is that the statement was in fact true, or that the recorded matter was not one the official had a duty to accept as evidence. The likelihood of damage, not actual damage, is enough for the offence.
Supreme Court decisions interpreting this section
-
Supreme Court Judgment No. 2630/2567 (2024)
Causing a land official to record a false statement in an official title document, in a manner likely to cause damage, supports conviction under Section 267 together with Section 137.
In connected proceedings the defendant was found guilty under Sections 137 and 267 and sentenced to six months imprisonment and a 3,000 baht fine, the prison term suspended for two years, arising from false particulars in a land title matter.
-
Supreme Court Judgment No. 2086/2567 (2024)
Merely giving false information to a registrar so that the registrar records it in the register is not using the resulting document. Where the complaint alleges no more than that, there is no offence of using a document produced by causing an official to record a false statement under Section 268 paragraph one read with Section 267.
The defendant authorised an agent to apply to register a change of the company's directors, bringing one in and removing the two plaintiffs. The Supreme Court held the complaint alleged only that he gave false information to the registrar to be entered in the register at the Samut Songkhram partnership and company registration office, not that he took the resulting registry document and used it. The dismissal of the Section 268 charge was therefore correct, and the conviction rested on Sections 137 and 267.
Curated decisions with case numbers verified against the Supreme Court database. English renderings are the firm's editorial translation for study.
Cited in 229 Supreme Court decisions (1962 to 2026)
Selected citing decisions
- Decision 914/2569 (2026)
- Decision 2558/2567 (2024)
- Decision 2086/2567 (2024)
- Decision 4109/2565 (2022)
- Decision 1518/2565 (2022)
- Decision 2805/2564 (2021)
- Decision 2361/2564 (2021)
- Decision 4017/2560 (2017)
This list is selected automatically, weighted towards judgments that turn on this section rather than ones that merely recite it when passing sentence. It has not yet been reviewed by the firm.
Most often cited alongside
- Section 137 148
- Section 91 135
- Section 83 133
- Section 268 124
- Section 90 118
- Section 264 73
Sections that appear in the same judgments as this one most often. The figure is the number of decisions.
Counted across the firm's corpus of 83,652 Supreme Court decisions, 1921 to 2026. The count is complete; the stated year range trims rare outliers so it describes where the citations actually sit. These figures are computed by us and are not official court statistics. How we count these, and what we measured
Frequently asked questions
How is Section 267 different from ordinary forgery?
In Section 267 the document is genuine but its content is false because someone lied to the recording official. Ordinary forgery under Sections 264 to 266 involves faking or altering the document itself.
Is it a crime to give false information for a land title record?
Yes. Inducing a land officer to record false particulars in an official document intended as evidence can be an offence under Section 267, often charged together with Section 137, with exposure of up to three years imprisonment.
Related guides on ThaiLawOnline
Cite this section
-
Plain citation
Penal Code, s. 267 (Thailand) -
Academic citation
Penal Code (Thailand), s. 267. ThaiLawOnline, https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-267/ (accessed 21 August 2026). -
Thai citation
ป.อ. มาตรา 267 -
Permalink
https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-267/ -
Embed on your site
<blockquote cite="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-267/"><p>Whoever gives information to an official acting in the course of duty, causing the official to record a false statement in a public document or an official document intended to serve as evidence, in a manner likely to cause damage to another person or to…</p><footer>Penal Code, s. 267 (Thailand) — <a href="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-267/">ThaiLawOnline</a></footer></blockquote>
The Thai text is authoritative. The English is an unofficial translation by ThaiLawOnline, free to reuse with attribution.