Book 3: Specific Contracts

Section 582: Termination of open-ended employment: notice requirements

Statutory text (Thai original)

ถ้าคู่สัญญาไม่ได้กำหนดลงไว้ในสัญญาว่าจะจ้างกันนานเท่าไร ท่านว่าฝ่ายใดฝ่ายหนึ่งจะเลิกสัญญาด้วยการบอกกล่าวล่วงหน้าในเมื่อถึงหรือก่อนจะถึงกำหนดจ่ายสินจ้างคราวใดคราวหนึ่ง เพื่อให้เป็นผลเลิกสัญญากันเมื่อถึงกำหนดจ่ายสินจ้างคราวถัดไปข้างหน้าก็อาจทำได้ แต่ไม่จำต้องบอกกล่าวล่วงหน้ากว่าสามเดือนอนึ่ง ในเมื่อบอกกล่าวดังว่านี้ นายจ้างจะจ่ายสินจ้างแก่ลูกจ้างเสียให้ครบจำนวนที่จะต้องจ่ายจนถึงเวลาเลิกสัญญาตามกำหนดที่บอกกล่าวนั้นทีเดียว แล้วปล่อยลูกจ้างจากงานเสียในทันทีก็อาจทำได้

Verbatim from the Royal Gazette / Office of the Council of State

English translation

If the parties have not fixed the duration of the contract, either party can terminate it by giving notice at or before any time of payment to take effect at the following time of payment. But no more than three-month notice need be given. The employer can, on giving such notice, immediately dispense with the services of the employee by paying him his remuneration up to the expiration of the notice.

This English translation is provided for reference only and has not yet been firm-verified. Always rely on the Thai original.

Firm annotation

Section 582 is part of Book 3 (Specific Contracts) of the Thai Civil and Commercial Code. This entry is awaiting firm-authored commentary; the statutory text above is verbatim from the Office of the Council of State (OCS Krisdika) Thai source, with the English translation from the FAO/UN FAOLEX repository. Always rely on the Thai original for legal proceedings.

High importance

Why this matters in practice

For lawyers: Section 582 sets the civil-law baseline; the Labour Protection Act may impose additional or longer notice obligations. For laypersons: if you have no fixed-term contract, the most notice either side needs to give is three months, timed to coincide with a pay date.

Legislative history

Part of the original Civil and Commercial Code codification; no major subsequent amendment.

  • employment termination
  • notice
  • open-ended contract
  • wage period
  • three months maximum

Supreme Court decisions interpreting this section

  1. Supreme Court Judgment No. 9778/2544 (2001)

    Section 582 fixes the timing of notice to terminate a hire of services by reference to the date on which wages actually fall due, and that date can be varied by the parties' conduct. Where the written work rules fix payment on the last day of the month but the employer has consistently paid one day earlier, that is an implied agreement between employer and employee varying the term of employment as to the payment date, which they may lawfully make. Notice must then be given at or before that actual payment date to take effect at the following one. The section does not override the internal rules regardless of their content: it applies to the payment date as varied.

    The employer's work rules fixed payment of wages on the last day of each month, but the employer had consistently paid one day before the end of the month. The Supreme Court held that this amounted to an implied agreement varying the term of employment as to the payment date from the last day to the day before, which employer and employee were entitled to make. The statutory payment date for June 1998 was therefore 29 June 1998, so an employer wishing to terminate with effect from 1 August 1998 had to give notice by 29 June 1998 at the latest for the notice to be lawful under section 582 paragraph one. The section was applied to the actual, varied payment date and not to the literal wording of the work rule.

    Read the full decision (deka.in.th)

Curated decisions with case numbers verified against the Supreme Court database. English renderings are the firm's editorial translation for study.

Cited in 143 Supreme Court decisions (1959 to 2024)

Selected citing decisions

  • Decision 4239/2563 (2020)
  • Decision 4030/2561 (2018)
  • Decision 892/2560 (2017)
  • Decision 2289/2550 (2007)
  • Decision 6881/2549 (2006)
  • Decision 6701/2549 (2006)
  • Decision 8570/2548 (2005)
  • Decision 6787/2548 (2005)

This list is selected automatically, weighted towards judgments that turn on this section rather than ones that merely recite it when passing sentence. It has not yet been reviewed by the firm.

Most often cited alongside

Sections that appear in the same judgments as this one most often. The figure is the number of decisions.

Counted across the firm's corpus of 83,652 Supreme Court decisions, 1921 to 2026. The count is complete; the stated year range trims rare outliers so it describes where the citations actually sit. These figures are computed by us and are not official court statistics. How we count these, and what we measured

Cite this section

  • Plain citation Civil and Commercial Code, s. 582 (Thailand)
  • Academic citation Civil and Commercial Code (Thailand), s. 582. ThaiLawOnline, https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-civil-code/section-582/ (accessed 28 August 2026).
  • Thai citation ป.พ.พ. มาตรา 582
  • Permalink https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-civil-code/section-582/
  • Embed on your site <blockquote cite="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-civil-code/section-582/"><p>If the parties have not fixed the duration of the contract, either party can terminate it by giving notice at or before any time of payment to take effect at the following time of payment. But no more than three-month notice need be given. The…</p><footer>Civil and Commercial Code, s. 582 (Thailand): <a href="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-civil-code/section-582/">ThaiLawOnline</a></footer></blockquote>

The Thai text is authoritative. The English is an unofficial translation by ThaiLawOnline, free to reuse with attribution.

This is educational reference, not legal advice. Consult a qualified Thai lawyer before relying on any provision.

Scroll to Top
WhatsApp LINE Call Book