Article 1729: Time limit and witnesses for the inventory of an estate
Statutory text (Thai original)
ผู้จัดการมรดกต้องจัดทำบัญชีทรัพย์มรดกให้แล้วเสร็จภายในหนึ่งเดือนนับแต่เวลาที่ระบุไว้ในมาตรา ๑๗๒๘ แต่กำหนดเวลานี้ เมื่อผู้จัดการมรดกร้องขอก่อนสิ้นกำหนดเวลาหนึ่งเดือน ศาลจะอนุญาตให้ขยายต่อไปอีกก็ได้ บัญชีนั้นต้องทำต่อหน้าพยานอย่างน้อยสองคน ซึ่งต้องเป็นผู้มีส่วนได้เสียในกองมรดกนั้นด้วย บุคคลซึ่งจะเป็นพยานในการทำพินัยกรรมไม่ได้ตามมาตรา ๑๖๗๐ จะเป็นพยานในการทำบัญชีใด ๆ ที่ต้องทำขึ้นตามบทบัญญัติแห่งประมวลกฎหมายนี้ไม่ได้
Verbatim from the Royal Gazette / Office of the Council of State
English translation
The administrator of an estate must have the inventory of the estate finished within one month from the time prescribed in Section 1728; but this period of time may be extended by permission of the Court on application made by the administrator before the expiration of the month. The inventory shall be made in the presence of at least two witnesses who must be persons interested in the estate. Persons who cannot be witnesses at the making of the will under Section 1670 cannot be witnesses for the making of any inventory under the provisions of this Code.
This English translation is provided for reference only and has not yet been firm-verified. Always rely on the Thai original.
Firm annotation
Section 1729 is part of Book 6 (Succession) of the Thai Civil and Commercial Code. This entry is awaiting firm-authored commentary; the statutory text above is verbatim from the Office of the Council of State (OCS Krisdika) Thai source, with the English translation from the FAO/UN FAOLEX repository. Always rely on the Thai original for legal proceedings.
Why this matters in practice
For lawyers: the inventory submitted to the court at the time of the petition for appointment is not the §1729 inventory — the latter must be prepared after appointment as a formal act in the presence of witnesses (Dika 2442/2521, 1024/2537). Deliberate failure to prepare the inventory within the deadline, where circumstances suggest risk of harm to the estate, is good cause for removal under §1727 (Dika 91/2534). For clients: if the estate administrator has not provided a list of estate assets within a month of appointment, you may apply to the court for an order or for the administrator's removal.
Legislative history
Part of the original Civil and Commercial Code codification; no major subsequent amendment.
Décisions de la Cour suprême interprétant cette section
-
Arrêt de la Cour suprême n° 1024/2537 (1994)
An estate inventory under §1729 is valid if prepared in the presence of at least two interested-person witnesses; their refusal to sign does not invalidate the inventory.
The co-administrators prepared the estate inventory and presented it to the interested persons, who refused to sign it because of an unrelated dispute. The court held the inventory was validly made in the presence of at least two interested-person witnesses under §1729 paragraph two; the refusal of witnesses to sign did not invalidate the inventory.
-
Arrêt de la Cour suprême n° 91/2534 (1991)
Deliberate failure to prepare the estate inventory within the statutory period, evidencing potential harm to the estate, is good cause for removal of the administrator under §1727.
The objector-administrator deliberately failed to prepare the estate inventory within the statutory period and showed conduct that could cause harm to the estate and other heirs. The court held this was sufficient ground to remove the administrator under §1727, and appointed the two applicants (children of the deceased) in their place.
Curated decisions with case numbers verified against the Supreme Court database. English renderings are the firm's editorial translation for study.
Cited in 16 Supreme Court decisions (1976 to 2009)
Selected citing decisions
- Decision 4692/2552 (2009)
- Decision 7448/2544 (2001)
- Decision 802/2542 (1999)
- Decision 1024/2537 (1994)
- Decision 5229/2534 (1991)
- Decision 2621/2534 (1991)
- Decision 5789/2533 (1990)
- Decision 1407/2530 (1987)
This list is selected automatically, weighted towards judgments that turn on this section rather than ones that merely recite it when passing sentence. It has not yet been reviewed by the firm.
Most often cited alongside
- Article 1728 12
- Article 1731 7
- Article 1732 4
- Article 1727 3
Sections that appear in the same judgments as this one most often. The figure is the number of decisions.
Counted across the firm's corpus of 83 652 Supreme Court decisions, 1921 to 2026. The count is complete; the stated year range trims rare outliers so it describes where the citations actually sit. These figures are computed by us and are not official court statistics. How we count these, and what we measured
Guides connexes sur ThaiLawOnline
Cite this section
-
Plain citation
Civil and Commercial Code, s. 1729 (Thailand) -
Academic citation
Civil and Commercial Code (Thailand), s. 1729. ThaiLawOnline, https://www.thailawonline.com/fr/thai-civil-code/section-1729/ (accessed 21 août 2026). -
Thai citation
ป.พ.พ. มาตรา 1729 -
Permalink
https://www.thailawonline.com/fr/thai-civil-code/section-1729/ -
Embed on your site
<blockquote cite="https://www.thailawonline.com/fr/thai-civil-code/section-1729/"><p>The administrator of an estate must have the inventory of the estate finished within one month from the time prescribed in Section 1728; but this period of time may be extended by permission of the Court on application made by the administrator before the expiration…</p><footer>Civil and Commercial Code, s. 1729 (Thailand) — <a href="https://www.thailawonline.com/fr/thai-civil-code/section-1729/">ThaiLawOnline</a></footer></blockquote>
The Thai text is authoritative. The English is an unofficial translation by ThaiLawOnline, free to reuse with attribution.