Section 45 — Post-release zone prohibition
English translation
When the court passes a sentence of punishment on any person, if the court is of the opinion that releasing that person will cause harm to arise in any locality or place, the court may order that person prohibited from entering the specified locality or place for a period not exceeding five years from the date of release from punishment.
This English translation is provided for reference only and has not yet been firm-verified — always rely on the Thai original.
Firm annotation
Section 45 gives the court power to impose the safety measure defined in Section 44 as part of a sentence. Two elements must be met: the person is being sentenced to punishment, and the court forms the view that releasing the person will cause harm in a particular locality or place. The ban runs for a period the court sets, capped at five years, counted from the date of release from the punishment rather than from the judgment. It is a forward-looking protective measure, not additional punishment, and its geographic scope is limited to the place specified.
Why this matters in practice
This ban is imposed at the court's discretion when it fears further harm in a specific place, and it only begins to run after release, so it can extend a person's restrictions well beyond the prison term. Because it is a discretionary safety measure, defense submissions on the age, conduct, and circumstances of the offender can matter to whether the court imposes it. If a post-release ban is being sought against you, preparing for the court hearing with counsel is advisable.
Supreme Court decisions interpreting this section
-
Supreme Court Judgment No. 1554/2539 (1996)
When sentencing an offender, the court may be asked under Section 45 to bar the person from entering a specified place, such as Buddhist temples and places of religious worship, for not more than five years from release.
In a case of stealing Buddha images from a temple, the prosecution invoked Section 45 seeking an order barring a defendant from entering temples or Buddhist places of worship for not more than five years from release. The decision itself turned mainly on whether the stolen image was an object of public worship under Section 335 bis.
Curated decisions with case numbers verified against the Supreme Court database. English renderings are the firm's editorial translation for study.
Frequently asked questions
How long can a post-release zone ban last in Thailand?
Under Section 45 the ban may last for a period the court sets, but not more than five years counted from the date the person is released from punishment.
Is a zone ban under Section 45 an extra punishment?
No. It is a safety measure the court may add when it believes releasing the person would cause harm in a particular place, not an additional criminal penalty.