Section 364: Entering a home without reasonable cause
Statutory text (Thai original)
ผู้ใดโดยไม่มีเหตุอันสมควร เข้าไปหรือซ่อนตัวอยู่ในเคหสถาน อาคารเก็บรักษาทรัพย์หรือสำนักงานในความครอบครองของผู้อื่น หรือไม่ยอมออกไปจากสถานที่เช่นว่านั้นเมื่อผู้มีสิทธิที่จะห้ามมิให้เข้าไปได้ไล่ให้ออก ต้องระวางโทษจำคุกไม่เกินหนึ่งปี หรือปรับไม่เกินสองหมื่นบาท หรือทั้งจำทั้งปรับ หมายเหตุ: [อัตราโทษ แก้ไขเพิ่มเติมโดยมาตรา ๔ แห่งพระราชบัญญัติแก้ไขเพิ่มเติมประมวลกฎหมายอาญา (ฉบับที่ ๒๖) พ.ศ. ๒๕๖๐]
English translation
Whoever, without reasonable cause, enters or hides in a dwelling place, a building for the keeping of property, or an office in the possession of another person, or refuses to leave such a place when driven out by a person entitled to forbid entry, shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding one year, or a fine not exceeding twenty thousand baht, or both.
Verified against the Thai source text, 6 November 2026
Penalty rates amended by section 4 of the Act Amending the Penal Code (No. 26) B.E. 2560 (2017). Current penalty: imprisonment not exceeding one year, or a fine not exceeding twenty thousand baht, or both.
Traduction française
Quiconque, sans motif raisonnable, pénètre ou se dissimule dans une habitation, un bâtiment servant à la garde de biens ou un bureau se trouvant en la possession d'autrui, ou refuse de quitter un tel lieu lorsqu'il en est expulsé par une personne ayant le droit d'en interdire l'accès, est puni d'un emprisonnement d'un an au plus, d'une amende de vingt mille bahts au plus, ou de ces deux peines.
What this means for foreigners
Section 364 protects the security of a home, a storage building or an office in the possession of another person. It is committed by entering or hiding there without reasonable cause, or by refusing to leave when a person entitled to forbid entry tells you to go. Because the text speaks of possession, not ownership, what matters is who occupies the place: an owner who lets a house or condominium to a tenant should not assume he may walk in at will.
The Supreme Court reads 'dwelling' with the Penal Code's own definition. In 7088/2550 a walled space with a doorway in front of the victim's room, used only by her, counted as part of her dwelling under section 1(4), so a group who came in and beat two people there committed aggravated trespass. By contrast, in 540/2554 men who assaulted someone in a snooker hall open to the public, during opening hours, committed assault but no trespass under sections 364 and 365.
When entry is followed at once by violence, the courts treat it as one continuous aggravated trespass under section 365(1) with section 364 (2813/2568, 2030/2568). In 6290/2537 a man who entered a woman's bedroom at night to rape her was convicted of attempted rape together with sections 364 and 365(3), all as one act punished under the heaviest provision.
Practical points for foreigners: a landlord, a former partner or a co-owner who no longer lives in the property may commit this offence against whoever is actually in possession. The basic offence is understood to be compoundable, so many cases end in settlement, but the aggravated forms in section 365 (force or threats, a weapon or two or more persons, night time) are treated as serious public offences. Related: section 362 (land generally), section 365. Glossary: Compoundable Offence, Inquiry Official, Fine, Leasehold. Under section 366 this offence is compoundable unless it falls under section 365 (aggravated trespass), so a settlement with the occupier ends the case.
Supreme Court decisions on this section
Supreme Court Decision No. 7088/2550
Facts: At night the defendant and others came into a walled area with its own doorway in front of the victim's room and punched and kicked two people there.
Held: That area was used only by the victim and was part of her dwelling under section 1(4), so entering it was entering a dwelling without reasonable cause; the defendant was guilty under section 365(2) and (3) with section 364, reversing the Court of Appeal's acquittal on that count.
Why it matters: An enclosed private area in front of a room or unit can be part of the dwelling.
ที่เกิดเหตุถือได้ว่าเป็นเคหสถานของผู้เสียหายที่ 1 ตามประมวลกฎหมายอาญา มาตรา 1 (4)
Supreme Court Decision No. 540/2554
Facts: Three men assaulted a person at a place with snooker tables open to the public, while it was open for business.
Held: Because the attack took place in an area any member of the public could enter, there was no trespass under sections 364 and 365; the defendants were guilty only of the assault, and their prison terms were suspended.
Why it matters: Entering premises open to the public, during opening hours, is not entering without reasonable cause under section 364.
ในบริเวณที่บุคคลทั่วไปย่อมจะเข้าไปได้นั้นย่อมไม่มีความผิดฐานบุกรุก
Supreme Court Decision No. 2813/2568
Facts: The defendants, who pleaded guilty, entered a house in another person's possession and immediately beat a man there with a knuckleduster, causing grievous harm.
Held: Entering and disturbing possession and then using force at once, while the trespass was continuing, formed one inseparable course of conduct, so the offence was trespass on a dwelling by force under section 365(1) with sections 364 and 83; the lower courts' classification was affirmed.
Why it matters: Violence used during the entry turns a section 364 trespass into the heavier section 365 offence.
ในขณะที่การบุกรุกยังคงมีอยู่ตลอดเวลาไม่ขาดตอน พฤติการณ์ความร้ายแรงไม่อาจแยกออกจากกันได้
Supreme Court Decision No. 2030/2568
Facts: Three defendants, who pleaded guilty, entered the victim's house with an axe and assaulted him.
Held: Entering another's dwelling and then immediately using force is trespass by force or threat of force under section 365(1); the lower courts were right on that point, and the Supreme Court corrected only the assault count from section 391 to section 295.
Why it matters: Confirms the same rule as 2813/2568 for home invasions followed by assault.
การที่จำเลยทั้งสามบุกรุกเข้าไปในเคหสถานของผู้อื่นแล้วใช้กำลังประทุษร้าย เป็นการบุกรุกโดยใช้กำลังประทุษร้ายหรือขู่เข็ญว่าจะใช้กำลังประทุษร้ายตามประมวลกฎหมายอาญา มาตรา 365 (1)
Supreme Court Decision No. 6290/2537
Facts: At about 3 a.m. the defendant entered the victim's bedroom undressed, punched her and tried to rape her.
Held: The defendant's continuous acts were aimed at rape and formed one act violating several provisions, including sections 364 and 365(3); he was punished under the heaviest provision, attempted rape.
Why it matters: Entering a home to commit another crime is charged under section 364 as well, but punished under the heaviest offence.
การที่จำเลยแก้ผ้าเข้าไปในห้องนอนอันเป็นเคหสถานของผู้เสียหาย ย่อมประสงค์ที่จะข่มขืนกระทำชำเรา
Related sections
- Section 362, Penal Code: Trespass on immovable property generally, requiring an intent to take possession or an act disturbing possession.
- Section 365, Penal Code: Aggravated forms applied with section 364 in 7088/2550, 2813/2568 and 2030/2568.
- Section 1, Penal Code: Item (4) defines 'dwelling' (เคหสถาน), applied in 7088/2550.
- Section 366, Penal Code: Believed to make the offences in this chapter compoundable except section 365; not confirmed in the pack.
Questions about this section
Can my landlord enter my rented condo or house without permission?
Section 364 protects a dwelling 'in the possession of another person', so the person in possession, not the owner, is protected. A landlord who enters a let home without reasonable cause, or refuses to leave when told to go, may commit the offence. Any right of entry agreed in the lease would be relevant to whether there was reasonable cause.
Is the area outside my front door part of my dwelling?
It can be. In 7088/2550 a walled space with its own doorway in front of the victim's room, used only by her, was held to be part of her dwelling under the Penal Code's definition in section 1(4). Shared corridors or areas open to everyone are different: in 540/2554 a snooker hall open to the public was not protected.
What happens if someone enters and attacks the occupant?
The courts treat entry followed at once by force as one continuous offence of aggravated trespass under section 365(1) together with section 364, as in 2813/2568 and 2030/2568. Aggravated trespass carries a heavier penalty than the basic offence and is treated differently from the basic compoundable offence.
Firm annotation
Section 364 protects the security of a building rather than title to land, and it has two distinct limbs. The first is entering, or hiding in, a dwelling place, a building for the keeping of property, or an office which is in the possession of another person. The second is refusing to leave such a place when driven out by a person entitled to forbid entry. The second limb matters in practice: a person who entered perfectly lawfully, as a guest or a customer, commits the offence by staying on once told to go. Running through both limbs is the requirement that the act be without reasonable cause, which is an element of the offence and not a defence for the accused to establish. The section speaks of a place in the possession of another, not the ownership of another, so possession is what counts and a landlord can commit the offence against his own tenant. The penalty is up to one year, or a fine of up to 20,000 baht, or both. Section 362 is the neighbouring offence and is differently aimed: it covers immovable property generally and requires either a purpose of taking possession or an act disturbing peaceful possession, neither of which is needed here. Section 365 raises the penalty to up to five years, or a fine of up to 100,000 baht, or both, where the offence is committed by using or threatening to use force, while carrying a weapon or by two or more persons jointly, or at night. Section 366 makes this chapter compoundable except for Section 365. The current rates were set by Section 4 of the Penal Code Amendment Act (No. 26) B.E. 2560.
Why this matters in practice
ความผิดฐานบุกรุกในหมวดนี้เป็นความผิดอันยอมความได้ตามมาตรา 366 การตกลงหรือถอนคำร้องทุกข์ของผู้ครอบครองจึงทำให้คดีระงับ และหากยังไม่ได้ร้องทุกข์ต้องฟ้องภายในสามเดือนนับแต่รู้เรื่องความผิดและรู้ตัวผู้กระทำ โทษจะสูงขึ้นมากหากมีการใช้กำลังประทุษร้าย มีอาวุธ หรือร่วมกันกระทำ เพราะจะกลายเป็นบุกรุกฉกรรจ์ตามมาตรา 365 ซึ่งจำคุกได้ถึงห้าปี ข้อต่อสู้ที่พบบ่อยคือการมีเหตุอันสมควรเข้าไป ความยินยอมของผู้ครอบครอง และข้อโต้แย้งว่าสถานที่นั้นเป็นเคหสถาน อาคารเก็บทรัพย์ หรือสำนักงานที่ได้รับความคุ้มครองหรือไม่
Supreme Court decisions interpreting this section
-
Supreme Court Judgment No. 2030/2568 (2025)
Where a person trespasses into another's dwelling and immediately uses force in an unbroken continuation while the trespass is still ongoing, the acts cannot be separated and constitute aggravated trespass by force under Section 365(1), built on the base trespass of Section 364.
The three defendants trespassed into another person's dwelling and then used force in an unbroken continuation of the trespass. The Court held the conduct was inseparable and amounted to aggravated trespass by force under Section 365(1).
Curated decisions with case numbers verified against the Supreme Court database. English renderings are the firm's editorial translation for study.
Cited in 310 Supreme Court decisions (1963 to 2025)
Selected citing decisions
- Decision 8583/2568 (2025)
- Decision 1689/2566 (2023)
- Decision 7574/2559 (2016)
- Decision 540/2554 (2011)
- Decision 7088/2550 (2007)
- Decision 3981/2550 (2007)
- Decision 5613/2549 (2006)
- Decision 5601/2549 (2006)
This list is selected automatically, weighted towards judgments that turn on this section rather than ones that merely recite it when passing sentence. It has not yet been reviewed by the firm.
Most often cited alongside
- Section 365 285
- Section 91 149
- Section 90 143
- Section 83 134
- Section 362 128
- Section 78 108
Sections that appear in the same judgments as this one most often. The figure is the number of decisions.
Counted across a fixed snapshot of the firm's corpus taken on 8 August 2026: 83,652 Supreme Court decisions, 1921 to 2026. The live corpus is larger and grows every week. The count is complete; the stated year range trims rare outliers so it describes where the citations actually sit. These figures are computed by us and are not official court statistics. How we count these, and what we measured
Related guides on ThaiLawOnline
Cite this section
-
Plain citation
Penal Code, s. 364 (Thailand) -
Academic citation
Penal Code (Thailand), s. 364. ThaiLawOnline, https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-364/ (accessed 9 November 2026). -
Thai citation
ป.อ. มาตรา 364 -
Permalink
https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-364/ -
Embed on your site
<blockquote cite="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-364/"><p>Whoever, without reasonable cause, enters or hides in a dwelling place, a building for the keeping of property, or an office in the possession of another person, or refuses to leave such a place when driven out by a person entitled to forbid entry, shall…</p><footer>Penal Code, s. 364 (Thailand): <a href="https://www.thailawonline.com/thai-penal-code/section-364/">ThaiLawOnline</a></footer></blockquote>
The Thai text is authoritative. The English is an unofficial translation by ThaiLawOnline, free to reuse with attribution.