Book 3 — Specific Contracts

Section 770

Statutory text (Thai original)

อันว่านายคลังสินค้านั้น คือบุคคลผู้รับทำการเก็บรักษาสินค้าเพื่อบำเหน็จเป็นทางค้าปกติของตน

Verbatim from the Royal Gazette / Office of the Council of State

คำแปลภาษาอังกฤษ

A warehouseman is a person who, in the usual course of his business, undertakes the storage and custody of goods for remuneration........ (up (/law-texts/thailand-civil-code-part-1.html#top)) ---------------

This English translation is provided for reference only and has not yet been firm-verified — always rely on the Thai original.

Firm annotation

Section 770 is part of Book 3 (Specific Contracts) of the Thai Civil and Commercial Code. This entry is awaiting firm-authored commentary; the statutory text above is verbatim from the Office of the Council of State (OCS Krisdika) Thai source, with the English translation from the FAO/UN FAOLEX repository. Always rely on the Thai original for legal proceedings.

Notable

Why this matters in practice

Lawyers: Enforcement of a pledge requires notice and public auction — the pledgee cannot simply appropriate the pledged property. Any surplus from the auction belongs to the pledgor. Laypeople: If you default on a pledge-secured loan, the lender must sell the pledged item at a public auction — not simply keep it. Any money above the debt must be returned to you.

Legislative history

Part of the original Civil and Commercial Code codification; no major subsequent amendment.

  • pledge
  • enforcement
  • public auction
  • pledgee rights
  • default

Supreme Court decisions interpreting this section

  1. Supreme Court Judgment No. 1381/2532 (1989)

    A person who receives goods for temporary custody to facilitate customs clearance is a bailee, not a statutory warehousekeeper — their obligations are governed by the bailment provisions, not the warehouse sections.

    The defendant accepted goods for storage so the owner could complete customs procedures — this was not a commercial warehousing arrangement for reward in the ordinary course of business. The defendant was therefore not a warehousekeeper under the Code, but rather a bailee, whose obligations regarding the goods differed from those of a statutory warehousekeeper.

    Read the full decision (deka.in.th)

Curated decisions with case numbers verified against the Supreme Court database. English renderings are the firm's editorial translation for study.

Related guides on ThaiLawOnline

This is educational reference, not legal advice. Consult a qualified Thai lawyer before relying on any provision.

Scroll to Top