Article 227: Case-ending orders are not interim orders

Décisions de la Cour suprême interprétant cette section

1. Arrêt de la Cour suprême n° 5836/2559 (2016)

   Where the trial court gives a preliminary ruling on a point of law under Section 24 that disposes of the entire case, an appeal and a further appeal against it fall under Section 227, and carry only the fixed court fee of 200 baht per instance, not an ad valorem fee on the amount in dispute.

   The trial court decided a point of law that ended the whole case. The Supreme Court held that the appeal and further appeal were governed by Section 227, so the fee was the fixed 200 baht per instance under Table 1, and ordered the excess ad valorem fee the defendant had paid to be refunded.

2. Arrêt de la Cour suprême n° 10260/2556 (2013)

   An order accepting an amended pleading is an interim order other than those listed in Sections 227 and 228. If the aggrieved party did not record an objection, the appeal against it is barred under Section 226.

   The trial court allowed the defendant to amend the defence. The Supreme Court held that this was an interim order not among those in Sections 227 and 228, so, absent a recorded objection, the plaintiff was barred from appealing it under Section 226.

Curated decisions with case numbers verified against the Supreme Court database. English renderings are the firm's editorial translation for study.