Article 176 — Guilty Plea and Conviction Without Evidence
Texte légal (original thaï)
ในชั้นพิจารณา ถ้าจำเลยให้การรับสารภาพตามฟ้องศาลจะพิพากษาโดยไม่สืบพยานหลักฐานต่อไปก็ได้ เว้นแต่คดีที่มีข้อหาในความผิดซึ่งจำเลยรับสารภาพนั้นกฎหมายกำหนดอัตราโทษอย่างต่ำไว้ให้จำคุกตั้งแต่ห้าปีขึ้นไปหรือโทษสถานที่หนักกว่านั้น ศาลต้องฟังพยานโจทก์จนกว่าจะพอใจว่าจำเลยได้กระทำผิดจริงในคดีที่มีจำเลยหลายคน และจำเลยบางคนรับสารภาพ เมื่อศาลเห็นสมควรจะสั่งจำหน่ายคดี สำหรับจำเลยที่ปฏิเสธเพื่อให้โจทก์ฟ้องจำเลยที่ปฏิเสธนั้น เป็นคดีใหม่ภายในเวลาที่ศาลกำหนดก็ได้
traduction anglaise
At the trial, if the defendant pleads guilty as charged, the court may render judgment without further taking of evidence, except in a case where the offence to which the defendant pleads guilty is one for which the law prescribes a minimum penalty of imprisonment of five years or more, or a heavier penalty, in which case the court must hear the prosecution's witnesses until it is satisfied that the defendant has actually committed the offence. In a case with several defendants where some of them plead guilty, the court may, when it thinks fit, order the case severed for the defendants who deny the charge, so that the prosecutor may prosecute the defendants who deny the charge as a new case within the time fixed by the court.
Cette traduction anglaise est fournie à titre indicatif uniquement et n'a pas encore été vérifiée de manière définitive ; référez-vous toujours à l'original thaï.
Annotation de l'entreprise
Section 176 governs guilty pleas within Title 2 (Trial). A plea normally lets the court convict without evidence, but the exception is critical: for serious offences carrying a minimum term of five years' imprisonment or more, a plea alone is not enough and the prosecution must adduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the court of actual guilt. This dovetails with sentencing and with Section 192 on judging in accordance with the charge, and it protects against wrongful conviction in grave cases. The second paragraph allows severance so that admitting defendants can be dealt with while those who contest the charge are prosecuted separately.
Pourquoi cela est important en pratique
This is one of the most important safeguards for an accused facing a serious charge. Even a guilty plea will not by itself support a conviction where the offence carries a minimum of five years, so the prosecution must still produce credible evidence, and if it declines to call witnesses the charge can fail. Before entering any plea, understand the minimum penalty for the exact offence charged, as it changes the entire dynamic. Weighing whether to plead guilty is a decision to take with a lawyer; consider an consultation en ligne avec un avocat thaïlandais before the plea hearing.
Décisions de la Cour suprême interprétant cette section
-
Supreme Court Judgment No. 5681/2568 (2025)
For an offence carrying life imprisonment, a guilty plea alone cannot support conviction; the prosecution must present evidence supporting the plea under Section 176.
The defendant was charged with an offence punishable by life imprisonment. Because a plea alone was insufficient, the prosecution presented evidence supporting the confession under Section 176, and the trial court convicted on that basis before reducing the sentence for the plea.
-
Supreme Court Judgment No. 1546/2568 (2025)
Robbery under Penal Code Section 339 carries a minimum of five years, so even with a guilty plea and no defence evidence, the court cannot convict unless the prosecution's evidence satisfies it of guilt under Section 176.
The offence carried a five-year minimum, so despite the guilty plea the court needed prosecution evidence. When the record showed the prosecutor stated it did not wish to call witnesses, there was no evidence on which to convict for armed robbery, and the point could be raised as a public-order question.
-
Supreme Court Judgment No. 5492/2567 (2024)
Where the defendant pleads guilty and the prosecution presents supporting evidence under Section 176 paragraph one, the court finds the facts from that evidence, and a defendant who disputes those findings must exercise the right of appeal rather than reargue them later.
The defendant pleaded guilty and the prosecution presented supporting evidence under Section 176 paragraph one, from which the trial court found intent to kill and convicted for attempted murder. The Supreme Court noted that if the defendant disputed the finding of intent, the proper course was to appeal the trial court's judgment.
Décisions sélectionnées avec numéros de dossier vérifiés dans la base de données de la Cour suprême. Les versions anglaises sont des traductions éditoriales réalisées par le cabinet à des fins d'étude.
Foire aux questions
Does a guilty plea always lead to conviction in Thailand?
Not always. Under Section 176, a plea lets the court convict without evidence, but for offences carrying a minimum of five years' imprisonment or more the prosecution must still prove actual guilt with witnesses.
What happens if the prosecutor does not call witnesses in a serious case despite a guilty plea?
The charge can fail. If the offence carries a five-year minimum and the prosecutor declines to present supporting evidence, the court has no basis to convict under Section 176, even with the plea.
Can the court split a case when some defendants plead guilty?
Yes. Section 176 lets the court sever the case for defendants who deny the charge, so the prosecutor can prosecute them separately as a new case within a set time.