Article 198 bis: Challenging a Refusal to Accept an Appeal
Statutory text (Thai original)
เมื่อศาลชั้นต้นปฏิเสธไม่ยอมรับอุทธรณ์
ผู้อุทธรณ์อาจอุทธรณ์เป็นคำร้องอุทธรณ์คำสั่งของศาลนั้นต่อศาลอุทธรณ์ได้
คำร้องเช่นนี้ให้ยื่นที่ศาลชั้นต้นภายในกำหนดสิบห้าวันนับแต่วันฟังคำสั่ง
แล้วให้ศาลนั้นรีบส่งคำร้องเช่นว่านั้นไปยังศาลอุทธรณ์พร้อมด้วยอุทธรณ์
และคำพิพากษาหรือคำสั่งของศาลชั้นต้น
เมื่อศาลอุทธรณ์เห็นสมควรตรวจสำนวนเพื่อสั่งคำร้องเรื่องนั้น
ก็ให้สั่งศาลชั้นต้นส่งมาให้
ให้ศาลอุทธรณ์พิจารณาคำร้องนั้นแล้วมีคำสั่งยืนตามคำปฏิเสธของศาลชั้นต้น
หรือมีคำสั่งให้รับอุทธรณ์ คำสั่งนี้ให้เป็นที่สุดแล้วส่งไปให้ศาลชั้นต้นอ่าน
English translation
When the Court of First Instance refuses to accept an appeal, the appellant may appeal by way of a petition contesting the order of that court to the Court of Appeal. Such a petition shall be filed with the Court of First Instance within fifteen days from the day the order is heard, and that court shall promptly forward the petition, together with the appeal and the judgment or order of the Court of First Instance, to the Court of Appeal. When the Court of Appeal considers it appropriate to examine the record in order to rule on the petition, it shall order the Court of First Instance to send it. The Court of Appeal shall consider the petition and issue an order either affirming the refusal of the Court of First Instance or ordering that the appeal be accepted. This order shall be final, and shall then be sent to the Court of First Instance to be read.
This English translation is provided for reference only and has not yet been firm-verified. Always rely on the Thai original.
Firm annotation
Section 198 bis provides the remedy against a trial court's refusal to accept an appeal under Section 198, ensuring that gatekeeping decision is itself reviewable. The petition must be filed with the Court of First Instance within a strict fifteen-day period from hearing the refusal, and the court forwards it with the appeal and judgment to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal's decision, whether to affirm the refusal or to admit the appeal, is expressly final, so no further petition to the Supreme Court lies against it. That finality, however, depends on the order being a genuine Section 198 bis ruling; where the underlying order was not truly interlocutory or the case had already been disposed of, the finality bar may not apply and the matter can proceed further.
Why this matters in practice
If your appeal is rejected by the trial court, do not give up: you have a fifteen-day window to petition the Court of Appeal to overturn the refusal, and this period is short and strictly enforced, so act immediately. Be aware that the Court of Appeal's ruling on this petition is final, meaning you generally cannot take a further petition to the Supreme Court. A common reason for refusal is a defendant sentenced to prison failing to present himself when filing, so fix any such defect. Given the tight deadline and the finality of the outcome, get help fast through an online consultation with a Thai lawyer.
Décisions de la Cour suprême interprétant cette section
-
Arrêt de la Cour suprême n° 3728/2561 (2018)
Where the Court of Appeal affirms a trial court's refusal to accept an appeal, that order is final under Section 198 bis paragraph 3, and the defendant has no right to petition the Supreme Court.
The trial court refused the defendant's appeal because he did not present himself. His counsel petitioned against that refusal, and the Court of Appeal Region 4 ruled on the point and dismissed the petition, affirming the trial court. The Supreme Court held that under Section 198 bis paragraph 3 this order was final, so the defendant had no right to petition, and it declined to rule.
-
Arrêt de la Cour suprême n° 6816/2560 (2017)
A petition contesting a refusal to accept an appeal under Section 198 bis must be filed within fifteen days of being deemed to know the refusal, which can be the same day where the appellant chose not to await the order.
The trial court refused the prosecutor's appeal because the trial judge did not permit a fact appeal, and the prosecutor petitioned under Section 198 bis to send the matter to the Court of Appeal. Because the appeal bore the standard notation that if the party did not await the order it would be deemed known, the Court of Appeal treated the prosecutor as knowing the refusal that same day for purposes of the fifteen-day filing period.
-
Arrêt n° 2483/2566 de la Cour suprême (2023)
Where the underlying order is not truly an interlocutory order because the case had already been disposed of, the appeal is not barred and the Court of Appeal's order is not final under Sections 196 and 198 bis.
After the case had already been disposed of by the order allowing withdrawal, the trial court's later order revoking the proceedings and the dismissal was not an interlocutory order. The Supreme Court held the defendant's appeal was therefore not barred and the Court of Appeal's order was not final under Sections 196 and 198 bis, reversed, and directed that the defendant's appeal be accepted.
Curated decisions with case numbers verified against the Supreme Court database. English renderings are the firm's editorial translation for study.
Cited in 42 Supreme Court decisions (1975 to 2023)
Décisions de citation sélectionnées
- Decision 2483/2566 (2023)
- Decision 3728/2561 (2018)
- Decision 6816/2560 (2017)
- Decision 9952-9953/2558 (2015)
- Decision 5023/2557 (2014)
- Decision 1939/2557 (2014)
- Decision 8020/2556 (2013)
- Decision 8842/2550 (2007)
Cette liste est sélectionnée automatiquement, en privilégiant les jugements qui reposent sur cet article plutôt que sur ceux qui se contentent de le citer lors du prononcé de la peine. Elle n'a pas encore été examinée par le cabinet.
Le plus souvent cité aux côtés de
- Article 196 6
- Article 83 du Code pénal thaïlandais 6
- Article 15 4
- Article 91 du Code pénal thaïlandais 4
- Article 198 4
- Section 5 3
Sections qui apparaissent le plus souvent dans les mêmes jugements que celui-ci. Le chiffre correspond au nombre de décisions.
Calculé sur l'ensemble du corpus de 83 652 décisions de la Cour suprême du cabinet, de 1921 à 2026. Le décompte est exhaustif ; la plage d'années indiquée élimine les valeurs aberrantes rares afin de refléter la répartition réelle des citations. Ces chiffres sont calculés par nos soins et ne constituent pas des statistiques officielles de la Cour. Comment nous les comptons et ce que nous avons mesuré
Foire aux questions
Que puis-je faire si le tribunal de première instance refuse d'accepter mon appel ?
En vertu de l'article 198 bis, vous pouvez déposer une requête auprès du tribunal de première instance dans les quinze jours suivant l'audience de refus, demandant à la cour d'appel d'ordonner l'acceptation de l'appel.
La décision de la Cour d'appel sur un appel rejeté est-elle définitive ?
Oui. En vertu de l'article 198 bis, l'arrêt de la Cour d'appel confirmant le refus ou admettant l'appel est définitif, vous ne pouvez donc généralement pas former de pourvoi devant la Cour suprême contre cet arrêt.
Guides connexes sur ThaiLawOnline
Citer cette section
-
Citation simple
Criminal Procedure Code, s. 198 bis (Thailand) -
Citation académique
Criminal Procedure Code (Thailand), s. 198 bis. ThaiLawOnline, https://www.thailawonline.com/fr/thai-criminal-procedure-code/section-198-2/ (accessed 1 septembre 2026). -
Citation thaïlandaise
ป.วิ.อ. มาตรา 198 ทวิ -
Lien permanent
https://www.thailawonline.com/fr/thai-criminal-procedure-code/section-198-2/ -
Intégrer sur votre site
<blockquote cite="https://www.thailawonline.com/fr/thai-criminal-procedure-code/section-198-2/"><p>When the Court of First Instance refuses to accept an appeal, the appellant may appeal by way of a petition contesting the order of that court to the Court of Appeal. Such a petition shall be filed with the Court of First Instance within fifteen…</p><footer>Criminal Procedure Code, s. 198 bis (Thailand): <a href="https://www.thailawonline.com/fr/thai-criminal-procedure-code/section-198-2/">ThaiLawOnline</a></footer></blockquote>
The Thai text is authoritative. The English is an unofficial translation by ThaiLawOnline, free to reuse with attribution.