Article 249: Civil Enforcement of Restitution Orders

Décisions de la Cour suprême interprétant cette section

1. Supreme Court Judgment No. 3447/2558 (2015)

   Once a criminal court orders the return or payment of the value of property, the victim is a judgment creditor and enforcement of the civil part proceeds under the Civil Procedure Code by force of section 249.

   The Court explained that although the prosecutor may claim property or its value for the victim under section 43, once restitution is ordered the victim becomes a judgment creditor under CPC section 50, and section 249 still directs that the civil part be enforced under the Civil Procedure Code, including its section 271 enforcement time limit.

2. Supreme Court Judgment No. 3659/2556 (2013)

   Enforcement of an order to return or pay the value of property under section 249 follows the Civil Procedure Code and need not wait until the criminal case becomes final.

   The first-instance court held that enforcement to return or pay the value of property must follow the Civil Procedure Code under section 249, need not await finality, and there was no ground to revoke the writ of execution or the seizure of the land; the point turned on the reach of section 249.

3. Supreme Court Judgment No. 11216/2555 (2012)

   Because the civil part must follow the facts established in the criminal judgment, enforcement of the civil restitution part under section 249 need not wait for the criminal case to become final.

   Reading sections 40, 47, 50 and 249 together with CPC section 231 and the rule in section 46 that the civil case follows the criminal facts, the Court treated the criminal case as controlling and addressed whether the joint plaintiff could proceed with civil execution without waiting for the criminal case to conclude.

Décisions sélectionnées avec numéros de dossier vérifiés dans la base de données de la Cour suprême. Les versions anglaises sont des traductions éditoriales réalisées par le cabinet à des fins d'étude.