Code pénal

Article 200: Prosecutor or investigator helping or framing a person

Statutory text (Thai original)

ผู้ใดเป็นเจ้าพนักงานในตำแหน่งพนักงานอัยการ ผู้ว่าคดี พนักงานสอบสวนหรือเจ้าพนักงานผู้มีอำนาจสืบสวนคดีอาญาหรือจัดการให้เป็นไปตามหมายอาญา กระทำการหรือไม่กระทำการอย่างใด ๆ ในตำแหน่งอันเป็นการมิชอบ เพื่อจะช่วยบุคคลหนึ่งบุคคลใดมิให้ต้องโทษ หรือให้รับโทษน้อยลง ต้องระวางโทษจำคุกตั้งแต่หกเดือนถึงเจ็ดปี และปรับตั้งแต่หนึ่งหมื่นบาทถึงหนึ่งแสนสี่หมื่นบาท ถ้าการกระทำหรือไม่กระทำนั้น เป็นการเพื่อจะแกล้งให้บุคคลหนึ่งบุคคลใดต้องรับโทษ รับโทษหนักขึ้น หรือต้องถูกบังคับตามวิธีการเพื่อความปลอดภัย ผู้กระทำต้องระวางโทษจำคุกตลอดชีวิต หรือจำคุกตั้งแต่หนึ่งปีถึงยี่สิบปีและปรับตั้งแต่สองหมื่นบาทถึงสี่แสนบาท หมายเหตุ: [อัตราโทษ แก้ไขเพิ่มเติมโดยมาตรา ๔ แห่งพระราชบัญญัติแก้ไขเพิ่มเติมประมวลกฎหมายอาญา (ฉบับที่ ๒๖) พ.ศ. ๒๕๖๐]

English translation

Whoever, being an official in the position of public prosecutor, prosecuting officer, inquiry official, or an official having the power to investigate criminal cases or to carry out a criminal warrant, does or omits to do any act in that position improperly, in order to help any person not to be punished or to receive a lighter punishment, shall be liable to imprisonment from six months to seven years and a fine from ten thousand baht to one hundred and forty thousand baht.
If that act or omission is done in order to wrongfully cause any person to be punished, to receive a heavier punishment, or to be subjected to a measure of safety, the offender shall be liable to imprisonment for life, or to imprisonment from one year to twenty years and a fine from twenty thousand baht to four hundred thousand baht.

ThaiLawOnline translation, written from the Thai original and verified

Firm annotation

The elements are: (1) the offender is an official in the position of public prosecutor, prosecuting officer, inquiry official, or an official having the power to investigate criminal cases or to carry out a criminal warrant; (2) an improper act or omission in that position; and (3) a specific purpose. This is the opening provision of the chapter on Malfeasance in Judicial Office, and it covers both directions of that abuse in its own two paragraphs. The first paragraph reaches the official who tilts the process in favour of a person, to help them avoid punishment or receive a lighter one, and carries six months to seven years with a fine of 10,000 to 140,000 baht. The second paragraph reaches the official who tilts it against a person, in order to cause them wrongfully to be punished, to receive a heavier punishment, or to be subjected to a measure of safety, and is far graver: imprisonment for life, or one to twenty years with a fine of 20,000 to 400,000 baht. Framing is therefore Section 200's own second paragraph and not a separate section; Section 201 is a different offence altogether, the bribery of a judge, public prosecutor, case prosecutor or inquiry official. The offence requires the specific purpose, not mere error or a good-faith exercise of prosecutorial discretion.

Why this matters in practice

This is a serious anti-corruption offence aimed squarely at prosecutors, investigators and officials empowered to investigate criminal cases or to execute criminal warrants, and it runs in both directions. Helping a person escape or reduce punishment exposes the official to seven years; framing a person, so that they are punished, punished more heavily, or made subject to a measure of safety, exposes them to imprisonment for life. Which paragraph is charged is therefore the whole of the sentencing exposure. The decisive element either way is the specific purpose, so a genuine, reasoned exercise of discretion (for example, declining to prosecute a weak case) is not caught. In practice, charges under this section frequently run alongside Section 157 (malfeasance in public office). Officials facing allegations, and complainants who suspect a case was deliberately buried or manufactured, should both seek criminal law advice in Thailand, as the intent element is the battleground.

Cited in 53 Supreme Court decisions (1960 to 2019)

Décisions de citation sélectionnées

  • Decision 2689/2560 (2017)
  • Decision 3130/2556 (2013)
  • Decision 929/2537 (1994)
  • Decision 69/2535 (1992)
  • Decision 4436/2531 (1988)
  • Decision 975/2531 (1988)
  • Decision 2707/2530 (1987)
  • Decision 300/2527 (1984)

Cette liste est sélectionnée automatiquement, en privilégiant les jugements qui reposent sur cet article plutôt que sur ceux qui se contentent de le citer lors du prononcé de la peine. Elle n'a pas encore été examinée par le cabinet.

Le plus souvent cité aux côtés de

Sections qui apparaissent le plus souvent dans les mêmes jugements que celui-ci. Le chiffre correspond au nombre de décisions.

Calculé sur l'ensemble du corpus de 83 652 décisions de la Cour suprême du cabinet, de 1921 à 2026. Le décompte est exhaustif ; la plage d'années indiquée élimine les valeurs aberrantes rares afin de refléter la répartition réelle des citations. Ces chiffres sont calculés par nos soins et ne constituent pas des statistiques officielles de la Cour. Comment nous les comptons et ce que nous avons mesuré

Foire aux questions

Qui peut commettre l'infraction prévue à l'article 200 ?

Four categories, not three. An official in the position of public prosecutor, prosecuting officer, or inquiry official, and also an official having the power to investigate criminal cases or to carry out a criminal warrant. The section also reaches both directions of abuse in its own two paragraphs: not only improperly handling a case in order to help a person avoid punishment or receive a lighter one, but also doing so in order to cause a person wrongfully to be punished, to receive a heavier punishment, or to be subjected to a measure of safety, which carries imprisonment for life or one to twenty years.

Le refus de poursuivre une affaire fragile constitue-t-il une infraction au sens de l'article 200 ?

Non, pas en soi. L'infraction requiert un acte répréhensible commis dans le but précis d'aider une personne à échapper à sa peine ou à la réduire, et non un exercice légitime et raisonné du pouvoir discrétionnaire du procureur.

Guides connexes sur ThaiLawOnline

Citer cette section

  • Citation simple Penal Code, s. 200 (Thailand)
  • Citation académique Penal Code (Thailand), s. 200. ThaiLawOnline, https://www.thailawonline.com/fr/thai-penal-code/section-200/ (accessed 30 août 2026).
  • Citation thaïlandaise ป.อ. มาตรา 200
  • Lien permanent https://www.thailawonline.com/fr/thai-penal-code/section-200/
  • Intégrer sur votre site <blockquote cite="https://www.thailawonline.com/fr/thai-penal-code/section-200/"><p>Whoever, being an official in the position of public prosecutor, prosecuting officer, inquiry official, or an official having the power to investigate criminal cases or to carry out a criminal warrant, does or omits to do any act in that position improperly, in order to…</p><footer>Penal Code, s. 200 (Thailand): <a href="https://www.thailawonline.com/fr/thai-penal-code/section-200/">ThaiLawOnline</a></footer></blockquote>

The Thai text is authoritative. The English is an unofficial translation by ThaiLawOnline, free to reuse with attribution.

Ce document a une vocation pédagogique et ne constitue pas un avis juridique. Veuillez consulter un avocat thaïlandais qualifié avant de vous fier à toute disposition de ce document.

Retour en haut de la page
WhatsApp LINE Appeler Rendez-vous