Code de procédure civile

Section 207 — Retrial after ex parte judgment

Texte légal (original thaï)

เมื่อศาลพิพากษาให้คู่ความฝ่ายที่ขาดนัดพิจารณาแพ้คดี ให้นำบทบัญญัติมาตรา ๑๙๙ ทวิ มาใช้บังคับโดยอนุโลม และคู่ความฝ่ายนั้นอาจมีคำขอให้พิจารณาคดีใหม่ได้ ทั้งนี้ ให้นำบทบัญญัติมาตรา ๑๙๙ ตรี มาตรา ๑๙๙ จัตวา และมาตรา ๑๙๙ เบญจ มาใช้บังคับโดยอนุโลม

traduction anglaise

When the court gives judgment against the party in default of appearance, the provisions of Section 199 bis shall apply mutatis mutandis, and that party may file a request for a retrial. In this regard, the provisions of Section 199 ter, Section 199 quater, and Section 199 quinque shall apply mutatis mutandis.

Cette traduction anglaise est fournie à titre indicatif uniquement et n'a pas encore été vérifiée de manière définitive ; référez-vous toujours à l'original thaï.

Annotation de l'entreprise

Section 207 gives the losing defaulting party a second chance and bridges the appearance-default rules with the well developed retrial regime for defence defaults. By importing Section 199 bis and Sections 199 ter to 199 quinque mutatis mutandis, it carries over the substance of a proper retrial request, the requirement that the default was not intentional or had reasonable cause, the deadlines, and the finality rules. Read with Section 206 paragraph three, it completes the two-track scheme: a party who reaches court during the ex parte trial uses Section 206, while one who remains absent until judgment uses Section 207. Case law confirms the retrial request must generally be filed within fifteen days of service of the writ of execution under Section 199 quater.

Pourquoi cela est important en pratique

If you lost by default at the hearing, the clock is the single most important thing. A retrial request under Section 207 generally must be filed within fifteen days of service of the writ of execution, and being even a day late, as one Supreme Court case shows, can defeat the request. Gather proof that your absence was not deliberate and file promptly. Because the deadlines are unforgiving, get advice quickly through an consultation en ligne avec un avocat thaïlandais.

Décisions de la Cour suprême interprétant cette section

  1. Supreme Court Judgment No. 1714/2567 (2024)

    A retrial request under Section 207 read with Section 199 quater paragraph one must be filed within fifteen days of service of the writ of execution; a request filed beyond that period, and beyond the eight-day period under Section 27 paragraph two, is not valid.

    The plaintiff argued that the first defendant, who learned of the suit on 21 March 2565 but filed for a retrial on 2 May 2565, had missed both the eight-day period under Section 27 and the fifteen-day period under Section 207 with Section 199 quater. The Supreme Court examined the timing against the writ of execution and these deadlines.

  2. Supreme Court Judgment No. 8539/2560 (2017)

    A request for a retrial under Section 207 presupposes enforcement of the judgment, whether by seizure of property or another method of execution; where there has been no enforcement against the party, the request does not meet the conditions of Section 207.

    The court below dismissed a retrial request because no enforcement, by seizure or otherwise, had been carried out against the objecting party, so the conditions of Section 207 were not met. The Supreme Court addressed this framework in reviewing the successive retrial requests.

  3. Supreme Court Judgment No. 1516/2559 (2016)

    Where the defendant defaulted of appearance and lost an ex parte judgment, the defendant may request a retrial under Section 207 with Section 199 quater by filing within fifteen days of service of the writ of execution on the defaulting defendant.

    The defendant had defaulted of appearance and lost an ex parte judgment. The Supreme Court confirmed the right to a retrial under Section 207 with Section 199 quater, filed within fifteen days of service of the writ of execution, and noted the finality of the judgment once the retrial period lapses.

Décisions sélectionnées avec numéros de dossier vérifiés dans la base de données de la Cour suprême. Les versions anglaises sont des traductions éditoriales réalisées par le cabinet à des fins d'étude.

Foire aux questions

Can I ask for a retrial after losing by default at the hearing?

Yes. Section 207 lets a party who lost an ex parte judgment request a retrial, applying Sections 199 bis to 199 quinque by analogy, provided the conditions and deadlines are met.

How long do I have to file a retrial request under Section 207?

Applying Section 199 quater, the request must generally be filed within fifteen days of service of the writ of execution on the defaulting party. Missing this deadline can defeat the request.

Does missing the hearing always mean I lose for good?

Not necessarily. If your default was not intentional or had reasonable cause and you file in time, Section 207 allows a retrial. But the deadlines are strict and a late request will usually fail.

Guides connexes sur ThaiLawOnline

Ce document a une vocation pédagogique et ne constitue pas un avis juridique. Veuillez consulter un avocat thaïlandais qualifié avant de vous fier à toute disposition de ce document.

Retour en haut de la page