Updates to the Thai law library

Reviewed by Wichuda Atthamethakon, LL.M., Thai Bar Licence 3149/2556, for ThaiLawOnline, a Thai law firm acting for foreigners since 2006.

Last updated on

This page lists, week by week, what we have added to the Thai law library or revised in it: annotated statute sections, revised translations and Supreme Court decision pages. Weeks start on Monday and the newest week comes first.

The same records feed the Thai Supreme Court decisions dataset, a CSV file you can download and reuse under a CC BY 4.0 licence.

Week of 2 November 2026

Sections annotated (80)

Each of these sections now carries commentary on how the courts apply it, the leading Supreme Court decisions, answers to common questions and a French translation.

Civil and Commercial Code

Penal Code

Civil Procedure Code

Land Code

Translations revised

The English translations of 2,500 sections were checked against the Thai text and 863 of them corrected: 587 in the Civil and Commercial Code, 35 in the Penal Code, 111 in the Civil Procedure Code and 130 in the Criminal Procedure Code.

Supreme Court decisions added (323)

Family law

  • Decision 3740/2525: A registrar cannot refuse a marriage because the foreign partner lacks immigration papers
  • Decision 580/2527: Only the statutory conditions of marriage allow a registrar to refuse registration
  • Decision 269/2531: An unregistered divorce leaves the spouses married and the property agreement unenforceable
  • Decision 4152/2532: A registrar waiting for an embassy certificate of single status has not refused
  • Decision 5887/2533: A divorce by consent between foreigners is valid if both national laws allow it
  • Decision 595/2534: A consent divorce signed at the district office and registered is complete
  • Decision 3666/2535: A police-station divorce memo with property terms is enforceable between spouses
  • Decision 1820/2537: A spouse can sue to compel registration of a divorce agreed in writing
  • Decision 6553/2537: A divorce of a registered marriage needs registration, so the wife can claim compensation
  • Decision 592/2538: A divorce agreement witnessed by only one person does not meet the legal form
  • Decision 592/2540: A wrist-tying ceremony is not a legal engagement and its payments are not recoverable
  • Decision 6035/2541: A customary wedding of a girl under fifteen is not a valid marriage
  • Decision 3484/2542: A note placing a child with relatives does not waive the mother’s parental power
  • Decision 4714/2542: Severance and fund payments received after a spouse’s death are not marital property
  • Decision 3780/2543: An unmarried mother alone holds parental power and may reclaim her child
  • Decision 6484/2545: Court permission to marry is needed only for parties under the legal age
  • Decision 448/2546: Courts may change a divorce parental power agreement when circumstances change
  • Decision 6981/2547: A father of a child born outside marriage has no parental power without legitimation
  • Decision 2960/2548: A divorce agreement giving the father sole parental power returns it to the mother on his death
  • Decision 6471/2548: A divorce court must decide parental power and child support even if no one asks
  • Decision 8144/2548: Money in a joint bank account is presumed marital, so each spouse can claim half
  • Decision 8954/2549: A customary wedding with no intent to register is not a legal engagement
  • Decision 8738/2550: The time limit to revoke a spouse’s gift must be pleaded or the court cannot apply it
  • Decision 10220/2551: Legitimation by judgment took effect only when final, so benefits claims failed then
  • Decision 2497/2552: A note added after marriage registration is not a prenup and can be avoided
  • Decision 4959/2552: A spouse can sue for maintenance alone without seeking divorce
  • Decision 5689/2552: After a spouse dies, a claim over marital land is an inheritance claim with a one-year limit
  • Decision 8523/2552: Islamic family law governs Muslim marriages in the four southern provinces
  • Decision 15984/2553: Court minutes recording an agreement to divorce are not a written divorce agreement
  • Decision 342/2555: A marriage registered only to lower a sentence is not a real marriage
  • Decision 566/2556: Spouses can agree orally to divide marital property differently from the equal split
  • Decision 2668/2556: A Thai court may give one parent sole parental power after a foreign divorce silent on custody
  • Decision 3602/2556: A third party cannot challenge a judgment declaring a child legitimate
  • Decision 6337/2556: An unregistered consent divorce leaves a cheque for the property share unenforceable
  • Decision 8040/2556: When a spouse dies mid-case, the divorce claim lapses and compensation falls away
  • Decision 19376/2556: A divorce suit ends when a spouse dies, and property is divided as at death
  • Decision 6499/2557: Spousal maintenance lasts until the marriage ends, not until the wife remarries
  • Decision 8624/2557: Land rights acquired through a state scheme during marriage are shared equally
  • Decision 14040/2557: Property bought in the Thai spouse’s name during marriage is still marital property
  • Decision 15200/2557: Court-ordered child support runs until majority, not to a fixed age of 20
  • Decision 2857/2558: On a spouse’s death, marital property is first split in half before the estate is shared
  • Decision 4239/2558: Life insurance paid on a spouse’s death is estate property, not marital property
  • Decision 4408/2558: A void second marriage creates no property rights for the second partner
  • Decision 4780/2558: Only spouses, parents and children can claim loss of support after a death
  • Decision 5535/2558: The court may fix parental power and child support in divorce without evidence
  • Decision 7074/2558: A father must support and educate children born by assisted reproduction until majority
  • Decision 10769/2558: The court may split parental power between parents even when no divorce is granted
  • Decision 10770/2558: No divorce living allowance where spouses had separated voluntarily for years
  • Decision 12502/2558: A father who legitimates his child shares parental power and residence follows best interests
  • Decision 13964/2558: A foreign husband’s pre-marriage money stays his in land, but buildings are shared
  • Decision 15721/2558: Land returned after a spouse’s death is neither marital property nor part of the estate
  • Decision 4345/2559: A divorce compromise approved by the court cannot later be avoided as a spousal contract
  • Decision 5660/2559: A man cannot petition to be declared the legitimate father of his adult child
  • Decision 7072/2559: Fault alone does not earn a living allowance, the spouse must also become poorer
  • Decision 8056/2559: A parent who gave up parental power in a divorce cannot represent the child in court
  • Decision 8455/2559: Marital property cannot be divided while the marriage subsists
  • Decision 8471/2559: A first suit that is dismissed without prejudice preserves the time to refile
  • Decision 8596/2559: A court can order joint parental power and weigh the wishes of an older child
  • Decision 8799-8801/2559: Property bought during a bigamous union remains marital property of the lawful marriage
  • Decision 8803/2559: Gifts before the wedding stay separate, but unproven deposits are marital property
  • Decision 10289/2559: Both parents must support their children according to each parent’s own income
  • Decision 517/2560: A police report signed by both spouses and two officers can be a divorce agreement
  • Decision 6924/2560: A second marriage while a spouse is still married is void even if the other party was deceived
  • Decision 7071/2560: Transferred property that earns no income does not remove a wife’s maintenance claim
  • Decision 7789/2560: A sale of marital land by one spouse without consent can be revoked
  • Decision 156/2561: A hidden sale disguised as a gift to a good-faith buyer cannot be revoked by the spouse
  • Decision 272/2561: A wife without income can claim spousal maintenance of 20,000 baht a month
  • Decision 1179/2561: Land bought with a foreigner’s money in a void marriage must be disposed of under the Land Code
  • Decision 2199/2561: A surrogacy father may be declared the legal father with sole parental power
  • Decision 3607/2561: A remarriage is void when the earlier divorce judgment is set aside on retrial
  • Decision 218/2562: A foreign couple’s marriage abroad can be void in Thailand if one spouse was still married
  • Decision 2124/2562: A child’s claim for past support is not time barred as arrears
  • Decision 3857/2562: A spouse can avoid a joint registration of property bought with a gift from their parent
  • Decision 3927/2562: On the mother’s death parental power passes to the father and support claims end
  • Decision 2580/2563: Only a registered marriage makes someone a lawful spouse under the Penal Code
  • Decision 2887/2563: A same-sex marriage registered abroad by two Thai women gave no spousal exemption
  • Decision 1028/2564: A spouse’s death ends the marriage, and the land is halved between widow and estate
  • Decision 3193/2564: A spouse can sue to revoke a sale of marital land without joining the other’s heirs
  • Decision 5980/2564: A life insurance policy paid for from marital income is shared property on divorce
  • Decision 512/2565: Revoking a spouse’s gift of land also returns the land to the spouses
  • Decision 755/2565: Gifts from parents without a marital designation are the receiver’s separate property
  • Decision 1478/2565: A gift of land between spouses is the receiving spouse’s separate property
  • Decision 3029/2566: For a court divorce, marital property stops accruing on the date the suit is filed
  • Decision 4044-4046/2566: Land registered to children without the husband’s consent can remain marital property
  • Decision 4837/2567: A court will not apply a time limit the defendants did not plead
  • Decision 5054/2568: Registering spouses’ shares separately turns marital property into separate shares
  • Decision 1694/2569: An agreement to support children through university is enforceable but can be varied
  • Decision 2984/2569: Heirs can sue to declare a bigamous marriage void after the spouse’s death

Property law

  • Decision 305/2489: A habitation right and usufruct left by will defeat the administrator’s lease
  • Decision 1320/2498: An unregistered right of habitation can be ended by the owner
  • Decision 482/2506: Permission to build on land is a licence, not a right of habitation
  • Decision 344/2511: A foreigner cannot use the courts to move nominee land to a Thai child
  • Decision 1810/2511: A void nominee arrangement can leave the foreign buyer with no money claim
  • Decision 2783/2516: A registered usufruct does not stop the owner selling, but binds the buyer
  • Decision 2428/2518: A usufructuary may sue for eviction without juvenile court permission
  • Decision 62/2524: A written nominee acknowledgment is void and gives the foreigner nothing
  • Decision 1492/2528: A court compromise handing land to Thai owners can be a valid section 94 disposal
  • Decision 3019/2528: A seller who keeps a registered life usufruct can sue tenants for eviction
  • Decision 4515-4516/2533: An alien can acquire a shophouse by adverse possession even without a valid sale
  • Decision 5570/2533: Unregistered adverse possession cannot defeat a good faith mortgagee who registered
  • Decision 6136/2537: A buyer from a nominee acquires no better right than the nominee had
  • Decision 128/2538: Land bought by a Thai spouse is not caught by the foreign ownership bar
  • Decision 301/2538: Later naturalisation does not cure land bought while the buyer was a foreigner
  • Decision 1038/2538: A nominee cannot sell a foreigner’s land on her own initiative
  • Decision 5825/2539: A foreign parent’s nominee land is part of the estate and children can claim it
  • Decision 7200/2540: A Thai will leaving land to a foreigner is valid though the foreigner may sell
  • Decision 2297/2541: A registered lease granted by a usufructuary survives the usufructuary’s death
  • Decision 667/2542: A will can create a superficies that the administrator must register
  • Decision 4580/2542: A foreign carrier can be sued where its local agent in Thailand is based
  • Decision 7341/2542: A usufruct over land covers the buildings on it and lets the holder evict a tenant
  • Decision 4813/2548: Being on bail does not make a prison the petitioner’s domicile for filing
  • Decision 2058/2549: A developer can sell part of an estate road despite the buyers’ statutory servitude
  • Decision 8637/2550: Adverse possession cannot apply to land the claimant was already entitled to hold
  • Decision 178/2551: A foreign defendant with no assets in Thailand can have debts owed to it frozen
  • Decision 339/2551: A right of habitation ends when the building it covers is demolished
  • Decision 5336/2551: A claimant who does nothing within fifteen days can be struck out without a hearing
  • Decision 6458/2551: A house you built yourself on another’s land gives no right of habitation
  • Decision 15018/2551: Small claims default rules displace the ordinary default procedure in section 198
  • Decision 307/2552: Only the dominant landowner can enforce a servitude and permissive use is not adverse
  • Decision 7500/2552: A foreigner cannot use adverse possession to avoid condominium ownership conditions
  • Decision 417/2553: Use of a path by the neighbour’s permission creates no servitude however long it lasts
  • Decision 10330-10331/2553: Missing the fifteen day deadline does not automatically strike out a counterclaim
  • Decision 5016/2555: An alien’s possession of land is not void, but the court would not declare his estate owner
  • Decision 6245-6246/2555: A lawyer’s misunderstanding of a deadline is not an excuse for default
  • Decision 15033/2555: While a usufruct lasts, only the usufructuaries can sue to evict a tenant
  • Decision 1490/2558: A foreign spouse’s half of marital land on divorce stays subject to section 86
  • Decision 3532/2558: A court may hear the other side before deciding an ex parte protection request
  • Decision 4061/2558: Without a registered superficies a building goes with the land on seizure
  • Decision 10840/2558: A specialised court must follow its own default rules before striking out a case
  • Decision 14002/2558: Section 254 protection is for before judgment, not the execution stage
  • Decision 1475/2559: The general venue rule applies unless the claim depends on enforcing a judgment
  • Decision 3883-3884/2559: A lessee shut out by the owner can get urgent court protection despite arbitration
  • Decision 6458/2559: The defendant’s domicile remains a safe venue even in a dispute from another court
  • Decision 5449/2560: A foreigner who funds a nominee purchase may be unable to recover the money
  • Decision 6412/2560: A developer cannot avoid a refund by calling its own sale to a foreigner illegal
  • Decision 7649/2560: Courts freeze only the part of disputed proceeds that the evidence supports
  • Decision 9882/2560: Long use of a neighbour’s soi gives a servitude for passage but not for parking or loading
  • Decision 527/2561: A defendant’s business address can be a second domicile for choosing the court
  • Decision 6006/2561: Building on land burdened by a right of way is not criminal trespass on the dominant land
  • Decision 8195/2561: Heirs of a foreign landowner inherit the sale proceeds, not the land
  • Decision 819/2562: An estate road owner may transfer it to the city without reducing the buyers’ servitude
  • Decision 1479/2562: A settled ruling not to strike out a case cannot be reopened by the defendants
  • Decision 5778/2562: A foreigner can evict an occupier and claim damages before selling the land
  • Decision 1480/2563: Heirs’ unregistered inheritance rights cannot defeat a good faith registered transferee
  • Decision 581/2565: A bank that took a mortgage in good faith keeps it though the heir was excluded
  • Decision 1060/2565: A court-approved settlement share stays incomplete as a real right until registered
  • Decision 2295/2565: A dishonest sale by an estate administrator gives the buyer no better right
  • Decision 2674/2565: A court cannot register a transfer for creditors without hearing the debtor
  • Decision 2811/2565: A claimed nominee cannot also claim adverse possession of the same condominium unit
  • Decision 3412/2565: An insurance claim can be filed where the policy was made or the accident happened
  • Decision 3857/2565: A foreigner who paid for land in a Thai partner’s name has standing to sue
  • Decision 1467/2566: Execution of a land judgment follows the boundaries actually possessed
  • Decision 2416/2566: A lender must check for unpaid buyers before taking a mortgage in good faith
  • Decision 5163/2566: An agreed partition plan marking an access road creates a servitude by agreement
  • Decision 244/2567: A replacement title deed unlawfully issued gives the buyer no ownership
  • Decision 1589/2567: Possession during a lawsuit over the land is not peaceful for adverse possession
  • Decision 1824/2567: For distance contracts either party’s location can be where the claim arose
  • Decision 2128/2567: An irregular partition does not let one heir evict the other co-heirs
  • Decision 2564/2567: An unregistered buyer in possession loses to a good faith mortgagee and auction buyer
  • Decision 5669/2567: An internal dispute procedure does not remove the right to sue over ownership
  • Decision 3885/2568: An owner can sue over land forfeited by an administrative narcotics decision
  • Decision 8105/2568: A creditor can challenge execution against assets in the court where they are
  • Decision 8322/2568: A foreigner can recover nominee land only on section 94 terms
  • Decision 9161/2568: A valid arbitration clause can send a dispute abroad despite a proper domicile venue

Succession and wills

  • Decision 891/2493: An oral will fails if there were no special circumstances or no prompt report
  • Decision 726/2496: Sudden colic is not an epidemic and does not justify an oral will
  • Decision 2082/2529: A district office will lacking the official seal can still be a valid ordinary will
  • Decision 3460/2530: An oral will is invalid if the testator could not speak or was not in imminent danger
  • Decision 1357/2534: An heir applying to be administrator must prove he is fit for the role
  • Decision 4043/2534: A handwritten note stating who gets the property after death can be a valid will
  • Decision 6013/2534: A lapsed gift in a will passes to the statutory heirs, who may seek to administer
  • Decision 5972-5973/2538: A court may add a co-administrator whose powers are limited to named assets
  • Decision 6595/2538: A will with no date is void and the estate passes as if there were no will
  • Decision 8222/2540: A holographic will must carry a date and an undated will is void
  • Decision 72/2542: Siblings do not inherit when the deceased left a descendant, so a widow may administer alone
  • Decision 4791/2542: A boy registered as the deceased’s son is not an heir if not his real child
  • Decision 8045/2544: Witnesses to a public will must see and hear the testator’s declaration
  • Decision 8018/2547: Extra witness signatures do not spoil a will written wholly by hand
  • Decision 9189/2547: An unregistered partner can be appointed co-administrator of the estate
  • Decision 2733/2548: A remote heir can be appointed estate administrator despite long delay
  • Decision 3662-3663/2548: Corrections made before a public will is complete need no countersignature
  • Decision 1223/2551: A printed military will form is void unless properly witnessed or handwritten
  • Decision 2102/2551: Witnesses who sign years after a typed will was signed do not make it valid
  • Decision 8189/2551: A public will can be made outside the district office by an acting district official
  • Decision 4698/2552: A public will is void if one witness signed a blank sheet without seeing the testator
  • Decision 9497/2552: An administrator appointed under a will manages the whole estate
  • Decision 4397/2553: Void gifts in a will go to the statutory heirs, not the other beneficiary
  • Decision 9599/2553: Property a will fails to dispose of passes to the statutory heirs
  • Decision 11034/2553: A will is void if either witness signed without seeing the testator sign
  • Decision 5691/2554: A widow shares the estate equally with the children as if she were a child
  • Decision 17338/2555: An unwitnessed alteration to a valid will is ignored without voiding the will
  • Decision 12752/2556: An oral wish to create a foundation is not an oral will without special circumstances
  • Decision 18489/2556: A will cannot pass a savings account the testator opened for a minor child
  • Decision 18882-18883/2557: Social security death benefits do not form part of the insured person’s estate
  • Decision 1276/2558: A surviving spouse inherits even from the other’s personal property, passing to descendants
  • Decision 1339/2558: A court cannot void a will for witness defects that nobody pleaded
  • Decision 2832-2833/2558: A certified thumbprint can satisfy the witness rules for an ordinary will
  • Decision 8687-8688/2558: Witnesses to a will may also certify a fingerprint, and a deaf testator’s will can stand
  • Decision 9683-9685/2558: A will is valid when witnesses see the signing and corrections are signed by all
  • Decision 2210/2559: Property a person only managed for others cannot be left by will
  • Decision 2864/2559: A settler’s right to use State land passes to his heirs as part of his estate
  • Decision 2874/2559: A will clause over property the testator did not own fails alone, not the whole will
  • Decision 9311/2559: A document that gives land now is a gift needing registration, not a will
  • Decision 3536/2560: An official’s questions and the testator’s confirmation satisfy the public will declaration
  • Decision 3884/2560: An oral gift of unpaid instalments needs writing, and a spouse shares with siblings
  • Decision 113/2561: An administrator can evict people occupying land a settler left in his estate
  • Decision 1518/2561: A public will is valid with every formal element and the challenger bears the burden
  • Decision 5288/2561: A will brought to the witnesses already signed by the testatrix is void
  • Decision 1180/2563: Land bought unlawfully by a foreigner in a son’s name stays in the estate
  • Decision 692/2564: An oral wish about funeral arrangements has no legal force without a valid will
  • Decision 4241/2565: A power of attorney that merely mentions death is not a will
  • Decision 4767/2565: Debts arising from administering the estate can bind the heirs or the estate
  • Decision 1023/2566: An administrator cannot give estate land to non-heirs who then claim the inheritance limit
  • Decision 1323/2566: A father’s spoken promise of land is not an oral will, so the land stays in the estate
  • Decision 1488/2566: Heirs must sue a dishonest estate administrator within five years of administration ending
  • Decision 2241/2566: An interested person need not be an heir to apply to administer an estate
  • Decision 3402/2566: An heir in possession of undivided estate land can still claim partition late
  • Decision 4557/2566: An heir’s signed acknowledgment of the deceased’s debt removes the one-year limit
  • Decision 4769/2566: The court can reshape a deadlocked panel of joint estate administrators
  • Decision 4887/2566: Without a will the estate passes to statutory heirs but a good faith mortgage stands
  • Decision 574-575/2567: A void will gives its beneficiary no standing to apply as administrator
  • Decision 2232/2567: A civil judgment against a deceased defendant can be enforced against his heirs
  • Decision 2629/2567: When one of two joint administrators dies the survivor can apply as sole administrator
  • Decision 2656/2567: Bank deposits are valued for inheritance tax at the date of death
  • Decision 4044/2567: A handwritten will on a printed form is valid if its substance is a last disposition
  • Decision 8420/2568: A seizure for one heir’s debts cannot affect other heirs’ inheritance rights
  • Decision 8829/2568: The one-year limit on claims against an estate runs from knowing of the death
  • Decision 8935/2568: A disinherited mother disputing ownership can join in administering estate land
  • Decision 8936/2568: Family side deals do not stop the ten-year limit on inheritance claims
  • Decision 284/2569: An administrator who transfers estate land to herself has not distributed it
  • Decision 1287/2569: A share left by will vests in the heirs at death and the administrator cannot transfer it

Contracts and leases

  • Decision 599/2500: Oral side arrangements around a registered land sale to a foreigner bind no one
  • Decision 1274/2501: A sub-agent can sue in Thailand if the authority expressly covers litigation
  • Decision 2180/2522: A lease that permits assignment can be transferred and seized by creditors
  • Decision 2288/2536: A general power of attorney lets an agent assign a claim under section 801
  • Decision 1050/2539: Unauthorised subletting lets the landlord terminate a lease immediately
  • Decision 383/2540: A bare right to assign a lease does not by itself make it inheritable
  • Decision 1729/2540: A 30-year lease alone does not make a lease pass to the lessee’s heirs
  • Decision 6843/2541: Letting out a building on leased land can breach a no-subletting clause
  • Decision 1690/2551: A power to sue any person is valid and cures an earlier sub-delegation
  • Decision 6659/2551: One standing power of attorney to sue can cover many defendants
  • Decision 8093/2551: A buyer staying on land after an unregistered khai fak gains no possessory right
  • Decision 9201/2551: A lease cannot be left by will unless the lease itself provides for death
  • Decision 1510/2552: A registered khai fak contract’s receipt clause binds the parties on payment
  • Decision 1990/2552: A tenant’s utility security deposit stays with the former landlord, not the buyer
  • Decision 2105-2106/2552: A general power to conduct cases covers disputes before and after it is signed
  • Decision 5801/2552: An unregistered sale with a promise to buy back is a void khai fak
  • Decision 44/2553: A buyer of let property can recover post-transfer rent and the tenant’s deposit
  • Decision 752/2553: Any agreed return for use of land can make an arrangement a lease
  • Decision 2083/2554: Listing litigation among an agent’s powers is enough to authorise suing
  • Decision 13288/2556: An oral sublease gives no protection against the owner when the head tenant is evicted
  • Decision 765/2557: A buyer of let property is not bound by the seller’s earlier assignment of future rent
  • Decision 990-991/2558: A subtenant has no better right than the head tenant when the head lease ends
  • Decision 1564/2558: Splitting a long lease into three-year leases does not secure the full term
  • Decision 2158/2558: An owner suing as owner can evict an occupier without proving a written lease
  • Decision 9535/2558: After a registered sale, the rent belongs to the new owner of the land
  • Decision 11044/2558: Supplying a crane with its operator is hire of work, not a lease
  • Decision 2521/2559: Oral promises cannot add to a written land sale agreement, so the deposit is lost
  • Decision 3836/2559: A long lease and lease-back of an airport is a genuine hire of property for tax
  • Decision 11058/2559: A registered 30-year lease with a sublet clause can pass to the lessee’s heirs
  • Decision 6834/2560: Commercial equipment leases are ordinary hire contracts unless ownership will pass
  • Decision 9990/2560: A fully paid pre-2008 condominium buyer can resist a later bad-faith registered buyer
  • Decision 1476/2561: Handing over possession of land can outweigh the register for possessory-right land
  • Decision 2359/2561: A power of attorney to sign company documents does not authorise suing
  • Decision 5149/2561: A power of attorney to conduct court proceedings includes authority to sue
  • Decision 5120-5122/2562: A good-faith khai fak buyer is protected only up to the redemption price
  • Decision 3692/2564: A khai fak contract that is really a secured loan is treated as a pledge
  • Decision 131/2565: An unregistered private sale of land is void and leaves only a short money claim
  • Decision 2775/2565: Rent for the period before a written lease was signed cannot be enforced
  • Decision 751/2566: Overstating the sum on a signed blank loan form can cost the lender the whole debt
  • Decision 1112/2566: Large transfers described in chats as investments are not enforceable as loans
  • Decision 4859/2566: A khai fak seller keeps a protected right to redeem even if the buyer’s assets are frozen
  • Decision 514/2567: A borrower who admits the loan cannot rely on the written evidence rule
  • Decision 1263/2567: A lender cannot keep a borrower’s title deed without signed proof of the loan
  • Decision 2162/2567: A chat routine of stating the loan and getting ‘agreed’ back can prove a loan

Obligations and torts

  • Decision 923/2549: A daily holdover charge in a lease is a penalty the court may reduce
  • Decision 6941/2560: An owner suing to recover its property is not caught by the one-year tort limit
  • Decision 1993/2562: The one-year tort period runs from knowledge of actual loss, not the first event
  • Decision 686/2564: A condominium can recover from a negligent manager after the tort period has passed
  • Decision 103/2565: Where the wrong is also a serious crime the tort claim has the longer criminal period
  • Decision 2764/2565: Consumers injured by slow-acting treatments may have three years to claim
  • Decision 1574/2566: A tenant leaving early is not automatically liable for all remaining rent
  • Decision 1765/2566: A time-barred tort claim may survive as a claim against an agent or representative
  • Decision 3290/2566: A compound interest clause in a loan can be cut back as a penalty
  • Decision 4290/2566: An early termination fee in a vehicle lease is a penalty the court can cut
  • Decision 432-433/2567: Signing blank forms as loan security can cost a landowner the land itself
  • Decision 2008/2567: A claim against a condominium juristic person must plead its legal basis from the start
  • Decision 6779/2567: A shortfall clause after a hire purchase car is returned is a reducible penalty
  • Decision 8982/2568: Punitive damages are not a penalty and cannot be reduced under section 383

Property offences and fraud

  • Decision 7088/2550: An enclosed private area in front of a unit can be part of the dwelling
  • Decision 540/2554: Entering premises open to the public is not trespass on a dwelling
  • Decision 7836/2556: Failing to pay for goods taken on sale or return is a civil debt
  • Decision 4096/2557: A caretaker holding keys and paying utilities commits theft, not misappropriation
  • Decision 1185/2561: A settlement can end a simple trespass prosecution even after an appeal judgment
  • Decision 2744/2562: A foreign buyer defrauded by a would-be nominee can be a criminal complainant
  • Decision 4893-4895/2565: Land investment sold on forged documents is fraud and restitution can be ordered
  • Decision 185/2566: Ignoring a civil judgment to block a neighbour’s access can lead to conviction
  • Decision 1496/2567: Each separate deception in a visa or nationality scam is a separate fraud count
  • Decision 2212/2567: A misappropriation complaint filed over three months after knowing the facts is time-barred
  • Decision 7211/2568: Settling a compoundable fraud case works only before the judgment is final

General principles

  • Decision 2711/2544: A land transfer hiding a redeemable sale is void and the parties restore each other
  • Decision 7770/2547: A sub-licence from an unregistered licensee is void and the payment cannot be recovered
  • Decision 6190/2550: An unregistered trademark licence is void and gives no standing to sue
  • Decision 4049/2555: A fuel-station franchise is not a trademark licence needing registration
  • Decision 840/2561: A foreign company’s condominium purchase outside the statutory categories is void
  • Decision 5440/2561: A sale with right of redemption disguised as a transfer is void if not registered
  • Decision 6025/2561: A payment to police to avoid prosecution of workers cannot be deducted from the price
  • Decision 1994/2566: An agreement to sell land is not a void sale for lack of registration
  • Decision 8418/2568: A private sale of state settlement land before the certificate issues is void

Criminal liability and defences

  • Decision 9435/2554: A defamation complainant whose own claim rests on a forged document has no standing
  • Decision 1861/2561: Public figures must tolerate wider criticism and obvious figurative abuse
  • Decision 4403/2566: Revenge posting can bring separate convictions for defamation and computer crime
  • Decision 406/2567: Honest criticism of a senior public official’s conduct is protected comment
  • Decision 418/2567: Insinuation in question form is still defamation by publication
  • Decision 976/2567: Broadcasting remarks online is defamation by publication even without naming the target
  • Decision 1351/2567: A combined defamation and publication charge belongs in the provincial court
  • Decision 5796/2567: A good-faith complaint to the proper authority is not defamation

Offences against life and body

  • Decision 18538/2555: A police interpreter’s translation of foreign witnesses can support a conviction
  • Decision 413/2560: Full compensation after an assault can turn detention into a suspended sentence
  • Decision 7491/2562: Assaulting foreign workers is punished as separate counts beside trafficking
  • Decision 361/2563: A victim’s compensation award follows the criminal finding even without an appeal
  • Decision 4292/2567: Defending a spouse with one proportionate punch is lawful self-defence
  • Decision 3538/2569: Courts reduce attempted murder to assault from the weapon, wounds and motive

Week of 26 October 2026

Supreme Court decisions added (18)

Family law

  • Decision 7534/2560: Leaving a Sick Spouse for Over a Year Is Desertion; the Other Woman Cannot Appeal the Divorce
  • Decision 7795/2560: A New Reason for Living Apart Cannot Be Raised for the First Time in the Supreme Court
  • Decision 8151/2560: At-Fault Spouse Cannot Claim Alimony but May Get Maintenance Until the Divorce Is Final
  • Decision 157/2561: A Wife Locked Out After Complaining of Her Husband’s Affair Has Not Deserted Him
  • Decision 875/2561: No Post-Divorce Alimony After a Consent Settlement Because No Spouse Is Found at Fault
  • Decision 5259-5260/2561: Secret Recording Admissible to Prove Adultery and Third Party Cannot Invoke One-Year Limit
  • Decision 4104/2564: Expelling the Wife From the Home Is Serious Hostility; Later Family Trips Are Not Forgiveness
  • Decision 4969/2565: Divorce by Consent Judgment Gives No Right to Compensation From the Spouse Under Section 1523
  • Decision 4977/2565: Spouse’s Death During Appeal Ends Marriage Before Divorce Is Final but Lover Still Pays
  • Decision 1519-1520/2566: An Earlier Dismissed Divorce Suit Does Not Bar Using the Same Facts to Prove a New Ground
  • Decision 1869/2566: No Thai Divorce From a Foreign Spouse Unless Their National Law Is Proved to Allow Divorce
  • Decision 452/2567: Divorce Registration Agreement Giving One Spouse the House Is Read to Include the Land
  • Decision 1242/2567: Sole-Fault Divorce Leaving the Older Spouse Poorer Gives a Right to Alimony
  • Decision 5579/2567: Compensation Claim Against Mistress Fails as Bad Faith After Years of Knowing Tolerance
  • Decision 1319/2568: Divorce Agreement on Sale Proceeds Binds Former Spouse Even When the Sale Is a Court Auction
  • Decision 3247-3248/2568: Adultery Issues Are Framed by the Pleadings, Not by the Court’s Abbreviated Statement of Issues
  • Decision 3615/2568: Spouse Who Admits Marital Assets Existed but Says They Were Sold Bears the Burden of Proof
  • Decision 8321/2568: Provident Fund and GPF Balances Accrued During Marriage Are Sin Somros Up to the Filing Date

Week of 28 September 2026

Supreme Court decision pages revised (11)

Week of 21 September 2026

Supreme Court decision pages revised (1)

  • Decision 1213/2517: Landlord’s death known before acceptance of a renewal promise

Week of 14 September 2026

Supreme Court decision pages revised (1)

  • Decision 5856/2567: Wife Suing Husband’s Mistress for Damages Must Plead Public Display of Adulterous Relationship

Week of 7 September 2026

Supreme Court decisions added (12)

Contracts and leases

Supreme Court decision pages revised (5)

  • Decision 1023/2531: Provocation, Not Self-Defence: Section 290 with Section 72
  • Decision 2790/2531: Cutting Across a Motorcycle at Speed in a Narrow Lane Is Intent to Kill by Foresight
  • Decision 6290/2537: Continuous Acts Aimed at Rape Are One Offense Punished Under the Heaviest Provision
  • Decision 208/2554: A Bullet Passing Through One Victim Into Another Is Attempted Murder by Transferred Intent
  • Decision 6336/2557: Sexual Intercourse Under Section 277: Oral and Anal Acts

Week of 31 August 2026

Supreme Court decision pages revised (100)

  • Decision 877/2501: Stealing electricity constitutes theft under Section 334 or aggravated theft under Section 335
  • Decision 59/2502: Believing the Victim Is Invulnerable Does Not Negate Intent to Kill
  • Decision 983/2508: Section 291 Does Not Reach an Omission: Acquittal of the Station Master
  • Decision 1408/2512: Threatening Violence to Escape Arrest Turns Theft into Robbery
  • Decision 1432/2515: Mistake of person under Section 61 is no defence to the charge, and the ambushers who shot the wrong rider remain guilty of premeditated murder under Section 289(4).
  • Decision 1396/2518: Secret Document Will: Validity Requirements
  • Decision 1294/2521: Calling out during the royal anthem while refusing to stand as everyone else did showed an intention to insult the King under Section 112.
  • Decision 1385/2522: Forgery, Use of the Forged Document and Fraud Are One Act Punished Under Section 268
  • Decision 1950/2527: Beating Without Intent to Kill Is Killing Without Intention Under Section 290
  • Decision 3090/2527: Section 289(2) applies only where the official was actually performing a duty at the time, so killing a duty NCO who was resting in his tent is murder under Section 288 alone.
  • Decision 1478/2528: The death was a natural and direct consequence of the shooting
  • Decision 337/2530: Interspousal Gift: Marital to Personal Property Conversion
  • Decision 263/2531: Repeated blunt force trauma to a vital area such as the head
  • Decision 98/2532: An open door is not a ‘barrier for protecting persons or property’
  • Decision 361/2532: A Shotgun Fired From the Hip at Close Range Leaves Intent to Kill in Doubt
  • Decision 3792/2533: Killing and Then Taking Is Not Murder to Obtain Property Under Section 289(7)
  • Decision 5592/2533: Firing Into an Occupied House at Night Is Intent to Kill by Foresight
  • Decision 5248/2537: A Death Sentence Reviewed Automatically Is Final: No Cassation
  • Decision 6683/2537: Borrower Lacks Standing to Claim Vehicle Damage
  • Decision 6711/2537: Prenuptial Agreement and Immovable Property
  • Decision 2690/2538: Nominee Land for a Foreigner: Not Wholly Void, but a Good-Faith Buyer Takes Priority
  • Decision 2755/2539: Stabbing to Stop a Beating With a Stick Is Lawful Self-Defense Under Section 68
  • Decision 2966/2539: Theft From an Employer Under Section 335(11) Does Not Require Entrusted Property
  • Decision 2417/2540: Where Penetration Does Not Occur the Offense Is Attempted Rape
  • Decision 5277/2540: Lease Renewal Clause Is Discretionary
  • Decision 6763/2541: A Promise to Renew a Lease Is a Personal Right and Does Not Bind a Later Transferee of the Land
  • Decision 4181/2542: Goods Given to Sell on the Owner’s Account: Misappropriation, Not a Civil Debt
  • Decision 9/2543: Taking an ATM Card Is an Offence Against a Document Under Section 188
  • Decision 6884/2543: A self-defense claim under Section 68 is unavailable when the threat originates
  • Decision 2567/2544: Firing Into a Crowd in a Confined Space Is Intent to Kill by Foresight
  • Decision 2971/2544: Silence on Maintenance in a Divorce Agreement Does Not Bind the Court
  • Decision 8694/2544: A Second Shot Is a Fresh Intent, and a Stray Round Is Attempted Murder by Transferred Intent
  • Decision 2742/2545: Half-Siblings as Statutory Heirs
  • Decision 3290/2545: Paternity and Maintenance in Single Action
  • Decision 6083/2546: Dismemberment Shows Concealment, Not Torture Under Section 289(5)
  • Decision 8104/2548: A Co-Robber Is Liable Under Section 339 Paragraph Two Even Without Knowing His Companion Was Armed
  • Decision 8015/2551: An Unregistered Superficies Still Binds the Parties Who Signed It: Just Not Third Parties
  • Decision 10344/2551: A Gift With a Reserved Usufruct is a Burdened Gift: Cannot Be Revoked for Ingratitude Under Section 535
  • Decision 7199/2552: A Will Granting ‘Right of Habitation and Usufruct for Life’ Gives Only Usufructuary Rights, Not Ownership
  • Decision 8155/2555: The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of an ambulance driver who passed a red light on an emergency run
  • Decision 16412/2555: Leaving the Person You Injured to Die Is Attempted Murder by Omission
  • Decision 15067/2557: Misreported Test Results: A Hospital Is Jointly Liable, and Time Runs Only from Knowing Both
  • Decision 17923/2557: Lease That Was Really a Sale: Foreign Buyers Cannot Compel Transfer to a Nominee Company
  • Decision 1296/2558: Built Before Registration: Not Marital Property, but Co-owned
  • Decision 3464/2558: Apartment Let Monthly or Longer Only Is Not a Place of Like Kind to a Hotel, So No Innkeeper Liability
  • Decision 8565-8566/2558: The company that installed the pyrotechnics was found criminally liable alongside its directors
  • Decision 13089-13090/2558: Shares Are Not Property That Can Be Misappropriated Under Section 352
  • Decision 2252/2560: Foreign Company Trading Land Loses the Right to Prosecute Its Own Directors
  • Decision 5457/2560: Sham Loan Hiding a Business Bought Through Thai Nominee Shareholders: Void, and the Money Irrecoverable
  • Decision 7345/2560: Child Maintenance Runs From Birth, Not From the Judgment
  • Decision 2236/2562: Cooperative Shares Bought via Salary Deduction During Marriage are Sin Somros
  • Decision 5299/2562: Excessive Self-Defense Under a Mistake of Fact: Attempted Murder, Sentence Suspended
  • Decision 2588/2564: Default Interest Steps Down to 5% from 11 April 2564
  • Decision 3122/2564: Commercial Leasehold Acquired by a Spouse During Marriage is Presumed Sin Somros Under Section 1474 paragraph two
  • Decision 3965/2564: Hire-Purchase: A 30-Day Notice Clause Blocks Early Termination
  • Decision 6010/2564: Civil Evidence Independent of Criminal Proceedings
  • Decision 6234/2564: School Officials: Joint Tort Liability for Unlawful Expulsion
  • Decision 186/2565: Land Given by One Spouse to the Other Without ‘Sin Somros’ Designation Becomes the Recipient’s Separate Property
  • Decision 1523/2565: Unmarried Partner Takes Half by Co-ownership, and the Loan Was a Sham
  • Decision 1674/2565: An Unregistered Partnership Dissolves on a Partner’s Death
  • Decision 2345/2565: Brand Ambassador Contract Breach: Restoration Required
  • Decision 2756/2565: A Shared Wall Between Adjoining Townhouses is Co-Owned Property: Not a Superficies Under Section 1410
  • Decision 2794/2565: No Contribution Between Joint Debtors Where One Did Not Contribute to the Harm
  • Decision 3379/2565: A Claim of Legitimacy Filed by the Putative Child Lapses One Year After Reaching Majority: Section 1556 paragraph three
  • Decision 3772/2565: Father May Re-File Paternity Claim if Prior Case Ended in Settlement Rather Than Adjudication
  • Decision 159/2566: A Company Is Not Bound Outside Its Objects; Signing Is Not Ratification
  • Decision 2651/2566: Director Acting in Bad Faith Becomes Personally Liable Alongside the Company
  • Decision 4538/2566: A Company Struck Off the Register as Defunct Needs No Liquidation
  • Decision 4655/2566: A 30+30+30 Lease Paid Up Front: the Renewal Promise Is Void, the First 30 Years Stand
  • Decision 220/2567: Way of Necessity (Section 1349) Must Be Strictly Construed: A Navigable River Still Counts as a Public Way
  • Decision 372/2567: Land Given by a Parent During the Marriage Is Sin Suan Tua and Cannot Be Seized for the Other Spouse’s Debt
  • Decision 451/2567: Three-Year Separation Divorce Ground Fails If Only One Spouse Wanted It
  • Decision 453/2567: Court May Allow a Parent to Sell a Minor’s Co-Owned Land for Education
  • Decision 464/2567: Loss of Use After a Building Stop-Use Order Is Ordinary Damage, Not Special Damage Under Section 222
  • Decision 1218/2567: Child Support Order Can Be Modified When the Child Permanently Moves to the Other Parent
  • Decision 1649/2567: A Guardian Cannot Renounce a Minor’s Inheritance Without Prior Court Approval
  • Decision 1781/2567: Selling the Land Is No Breach but Makes the Rent Share Impossible
  • Decision 2109/2567: Maintenance Does Not Depend on a Divorce, and the Husband’s Divorce Claim Failed
  • Decision 2359/2567: A Director Cannot Run a Competing Business Without Shareholder Consent
  • Decision 5902/2567: Mortgaging Estate Land for an Administrator’s Own Debt Is a Crime
  • Decision 44/2568: Administrator Transferring Estate Property to Self as Co-Heir Is Within Powers and Not Void Under Section 150
  • Decision 399/2568: Damages for Loss of Use from Wrongful Property Retention Have a One-Year Limitation Period
  • Decision 748/2568: Mistress is Liable for Damages Only If She Knew the Man Was Married: Heightened Evidentiary Standard
  • Decision 928/2568: Settlement Agreements Must Be Performed Exactly As Written: No Implied Obligations
  • Decision 1303/2568: Forfeiting All Sin Somros for Assault Is a Penalty and Was Reduced
  • Decision 1383/2568: A Compromise Settling the Old Debt Does Not Bar Setting Aside a Pre-Settlement Fraudulent Transfer
  • Decision 1552/2568: Common Boundary Walls in Housing Estates Belong to the Estate, Not the Individual Lot Owner
  • Decision 1687/2568: Adverse Possession Value in Controversy is Set by the Parties’ Stipulation, Not by Government Appraisal
  • Decision 2710/2568: Mortgage Foreclosure After 2014 Amendment Requires 60-Day Default Notice: Even on Pre-Amendment Mortgages
  • Decision 3001/2568: Renewing the Lease with Majority Estate-Administrators After the Old Lease Ends Does Not Breach the Prior Settlement
  • Decision 3107/2568: Assignee of a Claim May Sue to Set Aside a Debtor’s Fraudulent Transfer Under Section 237
  • Decision 3230/2568: Hire-Purchase Lessee Cannot Recover a Car Pawned by His Mother
  • Decision 3718/2568: An Auction Buyer of an Allotted Plot Takes the Utility Servitude and May Compel Its Registration
  • Decision 3902/2568: On the Father’s Death, Parental Power Automatically Vests Solely in the Surviving Mother
  • Decision 4273/2568: Section 1750’s Forms of Estate Distribution, and Why an Heir Suing Alone Recovers Only Her Share
  • Decision 4746/2568: Where Co-Heirs Tacitly Accept an Administrator’s Self-Transfer for Years, the Estate is Deemed Distributed
  • Decision 5326/2568: General Spousal Consent to Sign Documents is Not Ratification of a Joint Debt Under Section 1490(4)
  • Decision 5328/2568: Transfer of Marital Property Between Spouses Does Not Defraud Creditors When the Whole Property Remains Reachable
  • Decision 5409/2568: Warning First, Then Default, Then Notice to the Guarantor
  • Decision 6631/2568: Refinancing With a New Lender: the Assignment Rules Apply, and the Objection Failed on the Pleadings

Week of 24 August 2026

Supreme Court decisions added (1)

Family law

Supreme Court decision pages revised (2)

  • Decision 1326/2510: Each Driver’s Own Negligence Was a Direct Cause, So Both Are Guilty Under Section 291
  • Decision 4978/2562: Waiting Too Far Away to Help Makes an Accomplice, Not a Co-Principal

Week of 17 August 2026

Supreme Court decisions added (2)

Property law

  • Decision 6763/2541: A Promise to Renew a Lease Is a Personal Right and Does Not Bind a Later Transferee of the Land
  • Decision 3464/2558: Apartment Let Monthly or Longer Only Is Not a Place of Like Kind to a Hotel, So No Innkeeper Liability

Week of 11 May 2026

Supreme Court decisions added (105)

Offences against life and body

  • Decision 59/2502: Believing the Victim Is Invulnerable Does Not Negate Intent to Kill
  • Decision 983/2508: Section 291 Does Not Reach an Omission: Acquittal of the Station Master
  • Decision 1326/2510: Each Driver’s Own Negligence Was a Direct Cause, So Both Are Guilty Under Section 291
  • Decision 1432/2515: Mistake of person under Section 61 is no defence to the charge, and the ambushers who shot the wrong rider remain guilty of premeditated murder under Section 289(4).
  • Decision 1950/2527: Beating Without Intent to Kill Is Killing Without Intention Under Section 290
  • Decision 3090/2527: Section 289(2) applies only where the official was actually performing a duty at the time, so killing a duty NCO who was resting in his tent is murder under Section 288 alone.
  • Decision 1478/2528: The death was a natural and direct consequence of the shooting
  • Decision 263/2531: Repeated blunt force trauma to a vital area such as the head
  • Decision 1023/2531: Provocation, Not Self-Defence: Section 290 with Section 72
  • Decision 2790/2531: Cutting Across a Motorcycle at Speed in a Narrow Lane Is Intent to Kill by Foresight
  • Decision 361/2532: A Shotgun Fired From the Hip at Close Range Leaves Intent to Kill in Doubt
  • Decision 3792/2533: Killing and Then Taking Is Not Murder to Obtain Property Under Section 289(7)
  • Decision 5592/2533: Firing Into an Occupied House at Night Is Intent to Kill by Foresight
  • Decision 5248/2537: A Death Sentence Reviewed Automatically Is Final: No Cassation
  • Decision 2755/2539: Stabbing to Stop a Beating With a Stick Is Lawful Self-Defense Under Section 68
  • Decision 2567/2544: Firing Into a Crowd in a Confined Space Is Intent to Kill by Foresight
  • Decision 8694/2544: A Second Shot Is a Fresh Intent, and a Stray Round Is Attempted Murder by Transferred Intent
  • Decision 6083/2546: Dismemberment Shows Concealment, Not Torture Under Section 289(5)
  • Decision 208/2554: A Bullet Passing Through One Victim Into Another Is Attempted Murder by Transferred Intent
  • Decision 8155/2555: The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of an ambulance driver who passed a red light on an emergency run
  • Decision 16412/2555: Leaving the Person You Injured to Die Is Attempted Murder by Omission
  • Decision 8565-8566/2558: The company that installed the pyrotechnics was found criminally liable alongside its directors
  • Decision 4978/2562: Waiting Too Far Away to Help Makes an Accomplice, Not a Co-Principal
  • Decision 5299/2562: Excessive Self-Defense Under a Mistake of Fact: Attempted Murder, Sentence Suspended

Family law

  • Decision 337/2530: Interspousal Gift: Marital to Personal Property Conversion
  • Decision 2971/2544: Silence on Maintenance in a Divorce Agreement Does Not Bind the Court
  • Decision 3290/2545: Paternity and Maintenance in Single Action
  • Decision 1296/2558: Built Before Registration: Not Marital Property, but Co-owned
  • Decision 2236/2562: Cooperative Shares Bought via Salary Deduction During Marriage are Sin Somros
  • Decision 3122/2564: Commercial Leasehold Acquired by a Spouse During Marriage is Presumed Sin Somros Under Section 1474 paragraph two
  • Decision 186/2565: Land Given by One Spouse to the Other Without ‘Sin Somros’ Designation Becomes the Recipient’s Separate Property
  • Decision 1523/2565: Unmarried Partner Takes Half by Co-ownership, and the Loan Was a Sham
  • Decision 3379/2565: A Claim of Legitimacy Filed by the Putative Child Lapses One Year After Reaching Majority: Section 1556 paragraph three
  • Decision 3772/2565: Father May Re-File Paternity Claim if Prior Case Ended in Settlement Rather Than Adjudication
  • Decision 372/2567: Land Given by a Parent During the Marriage Is Sin Suan Tua and Cannot Be Seized for the Other Spouse’s Debt
  • Decision 451/2567: Three-Year Separation Divorce Ground Fails If Only One Spouse Wanted It
  • Decision 453/2567: Court May Allow a Parent to Sell a Minor’s Co-Owned Land for Education
  • Decision 1218/2567: Child Support Order Can Be Modified When the Child Permanently Moves to the Other Parent
  • Decision 1649/2567: A Guardian Cannot Renounce a Minor’s Inheritance Without Prior Court Approval
  • Decision 1781/2567: Selling the Land Is No Breach but Makes the Rent Share Impossible
  • Decision 2109/2567: Maintenance Does Not Depend on a Divorce, and the Husband’s Divorce Claim Failed
  • Decision 5856/2567: Wife Suing Husband’s Mistress for Damages Must Plead Public Display of Adulterous Relationship
  • Decision 748/2568: Mistress is Liable for Damages Only If She Knew the Man Was Married: Heightened Evidentiary Standard
  • Decision 1303/2568: Forfeiting All Sin Somros for Assault Is a Penalty and Was Reduced
  • Decision 3902/2568: On the Father’s Death, Parental Power Automatically Vests Solely in the Surviving Mother
  • Decision 5326/2568: General Spousal Consent to Sign Documents is Not Ratification of a Joint Debt Under Section 1490(4)

Property law

  • Decision 8015/2551: An Unregistered Superficies Still Binds the Parties Who Signed It: Just Not Third Parties
  • Decision 10344/2551: A Gift With a Reserved Usufruct is a Burdened Gift: Cannot Be Revoked for Ingratitude Under Section 535
  • Decision 7199/2552: A Will Granting ‘Right of Habitation and Usufruct for Life’ Gives Only Usufructuary Rights, Not Ownership
  • Decision 2756/2565: A Shared Wall Between Adjoining Townhouses is Co-Owned Property: Not a Superficies Under Section 1410
  • Decision 220/2567: Way of Necessity (Section 1349) Must Be Strictly Construed: A Navigable River Still Counts as a Public Way
  • Decision 5902/2567: Mortgaging Estate Land for an Administrator’s Own Debt Is a Crime
  • Decision 399/2568: Damages for Loss of Use from Wrongful Property Retention Have a One-Year Limitation Period
  • Decision 928/2568: Settlement Agreements Must Be Performed Exactly As Written: No Implied Obligations
  • Decision 1383/2568: A Compromise Settling the Old Debt Does Not Bar Setting Aside a Pre-Settlement Fraudulent Transfer
  • Decision 1552/2568: Common Boundary Walls in Housing Estates Belong to the Estate, Not the Individual Lot Owner
  • Decision 1687/2568: Adverse Possession Value in Controversy is Set by the Parties’ Stipulation, Not by Government Appraisal
  • Decision 2710/2568: Mortgage Foreclosure After 2014 Amendment Requires 60-Day Default Notice: Even on Pre-Amendment Mortgages
  • Decision 3001/2568: Renewing the Lease with Majority Estate-Administrators After the Old Lease Ends Does Not Breach the Prior Settlement
  • Decision 3107/2568: Assignee of a Claim May Sue to Set Aside a Debtor’s Fraudulent Transfer Under Section 237
  • Decision 3230/2568: Hire-Purchase Lessee Cannot Recover a Car Pawned by His Mother
  • Decision 3718/2568: An Auction Buyer of an Allotted Plot Takes the Utility Servitude and May Compel Its Registration
  • Decision 5328/2568: Transfer of Marital Property Between Spouses Does Not Defraud Creditors When the Whole Property Remains Reachable
  • Decision 5409/2568: Warning First, Then Default, Then Notice to the Guarantor
  • Decision 6631/2568: Refinancing With a New Lender: the Assignment Rules Apply, and the Objection Failed on the Pleadings

General principles

  • Decision 2690/2538: Nominee Land for a Foreigner: Not Wholly Void, but a Good-Faith Buyer Takes Priority
  • Decision 17923/2557: Lease That Was Really a Sale: Foreign Buyers Cannot Compel Transfer to a Nominee Company
  • Decision 2252/2560: Foreign Company Trading Land Loses the Right to Prosecute Its Own Directors
  • Decision 5457/2560: Sham Loan Hiding a Business Bought Through Thai Nominee Shareholders: Void, and the Money Irrecoverable
  • Decision 1674/2565: An Unregistered Partnership Dissolves on a Partner’s Death
  • Decision 159/2566: A Company Is Not Bound Outside Its Objects; Signing Is Not Ratification
  • Decision 2651/2566: Director Acting in Bad Faith Becomes Personally Liable Alongside the Company
  • Decision 4538/2566: A Company Struck Off the Register as Defunct Needs No Liquidation
  • Decision 464/2567: Loss of Use After a Building Stop-Use Order Is Ordinary Damage, Not Special Damage Under Section 222
  • Decision 2359/2567: A Director Cannot Run a Competing Business Without Shareholder Consent
  • Decision 44/2568: Administrator Transferring Estate Property to Self as Co-Heir Is Within Powers and Not Void Under Section 150

Obligations and torts

Property offences and fraud

  • Decision 877/2501: Stealing electricity constitutes theft under Section 334 or aggravated theft under Section 335
  • Decision 1408/2512: Threatening Violence to Escape Arrest Turns Theft into Robbery
  • Decision 98/2532: An open door is not a ‘barrier for protecting persons or property’
  • Decision 2966/2539: Theft From an Employer Under Section 335(11) Does Not Require Entrusted Property
  • Decision 4181/2542: Goods Given to Sell on the Owner’s Account: Misappropriation, Not a Civil Debt
  • Decision 8104/2548: A Co-Robber Is Liable Under Section 339 Paragraph Two Even Without Knowing His Companion Was Armed
  • Decision 13089-13090/2558: Shares Are Not Property That Can Be Misappropriated Under Section 352

Succession and wills

  • Decision 1396/2518: Secret Document Will: Validity Requirements
  • Decision 2742/2545: Half-Siblings as Statutory Heirs
  • Decision 4273/2568: Section 1750’s Forms of Estate Distribution, and Why an Heir Suing Alone Recovers Only Her Share
  • Decision 4746/2568: Where Co-Heirs Tacitly Accept an Administrator’s Self-Transfer for Years, the Estate is Deemed Distributed

Criminal liability and defences

  • Decision 1385/2522: Forgery, Use of the Forged Document and Fraud Are One Act Punished Under Section 268
  • Decision 6290/2537: Continuous Acts Aimed at Rape Are One Offense Punished Under the Heaviest Provision
  • Decision 2417/2540: Where Penetration Does Not Occur the Offense Is Attempted Rape
  • Decision 6884/2543: A self-defense claim under Section 68 is unavailable when the threat originates

Contracts and leases

Offences against the state and officials

  • Decision 1294/2521: Calling out during the royal anthem while refusing to stand as everyone else did showed an intention to insult the King under Section 112.

Sexual offences and liberty

Forgery, documents and currency

  • Decision 9/2543: Taking an ATM Card Is an Offence Against a Document Under Section 188

Thai Law Updates, free by email

Plain-English updates on Thai law changes that affect foreigners: property, visas, marriage, business and wills. One short email a month from a firm practicing since 2006. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Scroll to Top
WhatsApp LINE Call Book